IP Profile - 88.2% method
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Broadband
- :
- IP Profile - 88.2% method
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
11-01-2012 2:22 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: nozzer My line is averaging around 54000 CRC errors daily and the DLM selected fastpath after a SNR reset, and it stays there no problem at all! Interleaving is set to "auto" and is currently switched off.
Almost exactly the same error rate as mine, with the same outcome from the DLM!
I think there are other weird and wonderful things happening with the DLM which we are not privy to - on the few occasions I have disconnected via the GUI and then rebooted to try and get above the "magic" 10Mbps sync the SNRM jumps up to about 9.5dB (whether I've improved or worsened my sync speed!) and then drops slowly over the next few days to the "normal" 7.5dB (daytime) and around 5dB (evening peak.)
I assume this is the DLM lowering the output power to minimise interference at the exchange rather than deciding I can achieve a reliable higher sync...................?
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
11-01-2012 3:36 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I think this means that if the mean time between retrains is, say, 33600 seconds (for a "stable option" line), then the DLM will hold the initial target SNRM of 6dB. If the Mean time between errors is better than 6000 seconds, the DLM will reduce the SNRM to the min target of 3dB, otherwise it will stay at 6dB.. In other words, retrains come first, then errors.
A higher retrain or error rate will cause the DLM to choose another setting of SNRM to test the retrain rate, and then the error rate. This would explain why my line, which has an apparent high error rate, but which never drops out, is stable at 6dB.
That's my theory any road up!
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
11-01-2012 4:47 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I guess a red threshold is one where, if worse than, DLM downgrades you, while if better than the green threshold, then it upgrades.
I wonder what timescale the 'mean' is calculated over.
Using FTTC since 2011. Currently on 80/20 Unlimited Fibre Extra.
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
11-01-2012 5:00 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I have raised your profile to 4200 to allow for your new BT IP profile. This should take effect shortly.
Jojo
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
11-01-2012 5:36 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
12-01-2012 6:59 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
12-01-2012 9:38 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I've heard people report that before, but it's doesn't last long.
@nozzer,
Your profile is correct at 10500 for a sync rate of 12012.
Jojo
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
13-01-2012 11:09 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I just used some of the terms on that image in Google to see if I could see any descriptions of DLM.
And up popped this patent to a few guys in Suffolk (ie BT's research labs). If you can do the verbal equivalent of walking through treacle, you might find it interesting. It is dated 2011, but from the references inside, I suspect it might just go back to 2006.
Happy reading
Using FTTC since 2011. Currently on 80/20 Unlimited Fibre Extra.
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
14-01-2012 10:15 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
14-01-2012 12:03 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
On the other hand, where we have no public information about what DLM does under the hood, just a lot of informed (and uninformed) guesswork, this might now provide a framework. Like any work of science or engineering, you see if the theory fits the observations...
Of interest to some is the fact that DLM must pretty much be a software algorithm, employed in a processor somewhere. But... I could have sworn that the UK patent office didn't accept software patents! I'll have to read it more thoroughly.
Using FTTC since 2011. Currently on 80/20 Unlimited Fibre Extra.
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
14-01-2012 12:23 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
The company I worked for were taken to court for infringing this patent as well as others. I know that it did not infringe it as the last design changed that I did before launch was to transfer the variables that did infringe from the external to the internal E2PROM.
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
17-01-2012 10:54 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
17-01-2012 11:58 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I have seen lines that have been much more stable with banding applied. It may be that the problems which caused your line to be banded in the first place are not evident at the moment; merely speculation though
Jojo
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
26-02-2012 11:49 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: IKnowNothing
Quote from: itsme Has anyone had the banding raised or removed automatically by the DLM?
Not yet.
So, just to drag this back up for info for anyone interested. Now had my banded profile either removed or raised automatically about 1 and a half months later. Router just resynched by itself at 4536 with an SNR margin of 10. If I remember correctly I think that's probably the next band up from what I was on before so raised rather than removed completely is my guess at the moment.
Re: IP Profile - 88.2% method
27-02-2012 9:32 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Yes, it has moved up to the next band. Your profile looks like there's no interleaving on, so I would imagine if it lifted completely there'd be a danger of it becoming intermittent, which would probably put interleaving on. If you were in the test socket, having changed filters it may be worth lifting it. I can do that if you'd like to try it?
Jojo
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page