Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Blacklist being ignored?
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- :
- Blacklist being ignored?
Blacklist being ignored?
01-07-2010 10:40 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Have got the domain emv5.com in the email blacklist but am getting email from this domain in my mailbox.
Any ideas why?
Return-path: <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>
Envelope-to: xxx@xxx.plus.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:00:31 +0100
Received: from [212.159.7.102] (helo=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net)
by pih-inmx11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1OU7Ch-0003Bn-0z
for alan@cjags.plus.com; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:00:31 +0100
Received-SPF: Pass identity=pra; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass identity=mailfrom; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass identity=helo; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="postmaster@lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-SBRS: 0.0
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicwACN3K0xRXHJpZGdsb2JhbACBQ2J1nDsIGgkMBhIDH7J3jTyCVAQLDgiBcDwE
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,6029"; a="356201178"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,516,1272841200";
d="scan'208,217";a="356201178"
Received: from lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com ([81.92.114.105])
by mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2010 01:00:29 +0100
Received: by lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com id h5fd9q0hu6ok for <xxx@xxx.plus.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:00:27 +0200 (envelope-from <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Martin at Money Hospital <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>
Reply-To: Money Hospital <reply@moneyhospital.co.uk>
To: A Johnston <xxx@xxx.plus.com>
Message-ID: <42213348383.7625242.1277942427338@p1enginer1.emv2.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=762524242213348383
X-EMV-Platform: ccc.campaigncommander.com$
X-EMV-CampagneId: 7625242$
X-EMV-MemberId: 42213348383$
List-Unsubscribe: http://trc.emv2.com/HD?a=DNX7CqDykaXw8SA9MKI7geDnGHxKDvy0fAzP
X-PN-Virus-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)
X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)
Any ideas why?
Return-path: <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>
Envelope-to: xxx@xxx.plus.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:00:31 +0100
Received: from [212.159.7.102] (helo=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net)
by pih-inmx11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1OU7Ch-0003Bn-0z
for alan@cjags.plus.com; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:00:31 +0100
Received-SPF: Pass identity=pra; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass identity=mailfrom; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass identity=helo; client-ip=81.92.114.105;
receiver=mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net;
envelope-from="email@addmomentum.emv5.com";
x-sender="postmaster@lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-SBRS: 0.0
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicwACN3K0xRXHJpZGdsb2JhbACBQ2J1nDsIGgkMBhIDH7J3jTyCVAQLDgiBcDwE
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,6029"; a="356201178"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,516,1272841200";
d="scan'208,217";a="356201178"
Received: from lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com ([81.92.114.105])
by mx.pcl-ipin03.plus.net with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2010 01:00:29 +0100
Received: by lithium-onzefi.ccemails.com id h5fd9q0hu6ok for <xxx@xxx.plus.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:00:27 +0200 (envelope-from <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 02:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Martin at Money Hospital <email@addmomentum.emv5.com>
Reply-To: Money Hospital <reply@moneyhospital.co.uk>
To: A Johnston <xxx@xxx.plus.com>
Message-ID: <42213348383.7625242.1277942427338@p1enginer1.emv2.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=762524242213348383
X-EMV-Platform: ccc.campaigncommander.com$
X-EMV-CampagneId: 7625242$
X-EMV-MemberId: 42213348383$
List-Unsubscribe: http://trc.emv2.com/HD?a=DNX7CqDykaXw8SA9MKI7geDnGHxKDvy0fAzP
X-PN-Virus-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)
X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)
Message 1 of 4
(2,578 Views)
3 REPLIES 3
Re: Blacklist being ignored?
01-07-2010 1:43 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
IIRC you have to specify the full domain to be blocked -- ie. in this case, you would need to block addmomentum.emv5.com, not simply emv5.com . I THINK this is right?
Another possibility is that your receiving mailbox is a catchall? Apparently, white/blacklists don't work with these.
Best wishes
Chris
Another possibility is that your receiving mailbox is a catchall? Apparently, white/blacklists don't work with these.
Best wishes
Chris
Message 2 of 4
(890 Views)
Re: Blacklist being ignored?
01-07-2010 2:08 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Email account isn't a catchall so could be your first suggestion.
Message 3 of 4
(890 Views)
Re: Blacklist being ignored?
02-07-2010 5:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Hi cjags,
I'm pretty sure chrisL has it spot on, you would need the full domain. If it doesn't work then don't hesitate to get back to us.
Jojo
I'm pretty sure chrisL has it spot on, you would need the full domain. If it doesn't work then don't hesitate to get back to us.
Jojo
Message 4 of 4
(890 Views)
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page