Ticket limit

[#1]

Why can I not raise more than 4 tickets? Is it to make sure that the stats don't show up the lack of support to customers?

[#2]

Although this seems to be an arbitrarily low number it does prevent multiple tickets covering the same issue - Do you really have more than 4 completely separate problems that need investigation?

[#3]

They may be different aspects of an enquiry, and as such should have their own thread. From what I have seen of the standard of support, it would be very easy to get beyond 4. I currently have 2 on hold until next week, but they count as part of the 4

[#4]

If you have one enquiry it should all be in one place to help staff sort it
You should not start a new ticket referring to the existing one as you suggested in another thread

[#5]

It has been accepted by PN staff that putting anything on an existing thread puts it to the bottom of the queue
dick:quote

[#6]

Yes that's it you wait your turn 

[#7]

Exactly my point. If your ticket is getting to the top of the pile, and you add some information that could be helpful, then that ticket should stay in its current position rather than being relegated to the bottom of the queue again
dick:quote

[#8]

Unfortunately that's the way it works (for everyone) at the moment.  Adding extra detail in follow up tickets adds nothing as the original ticket will be worked on without reference to subsequent ones.

[#9]

I've just checked your account friendinneed and can see that there is some duplication across the tickets.
I'm closing one of them down now, I can also see there's a manager escalation open under 95381120 at the moment.

[#10]

And if anyone thinks creating extra tickets will reduce the workload that CSC have to deal with and get tickets processed quicker, then they aren't thinking things through logically.

[#11]

I have some sympathy with friendinneed
Until this nonsense with the addition of information pushing the ticket to the back of the queue is stopped it's very tempting to do as he has done.

[#12]

Having looked at posts made, as it's the landline that is out, I now have every sympathy as well.
I do not understand why this issue of ticket queues for landline faults are not processed promptly, I see no reason for them being on hold at all. Openreach engineers work 6 days a week on phone stuff, as this looks like it's only as visit to the exchange that's needed to resolve the problem, it should be resolved immediately especially as this is a new customer and a transfer from another provider that has not been done correctly by Openreach.
This looks like another example of where Plusnet's CEO has done nothing to get Openreach to prioritise such foul-ups.

[#13]

I think it unfair only to blame PlusNet CEO for failing to take Openreach to task. It is more a case of too much separation between the frontline staff who do a grand job, considering the restraints they are put under, and the CEO. Too many layers of middle management who don't really care about the customer, and are not prepared to put their cushy job in jeopardy.
The CEO is part of BT and can only rock the boat given sufficient ammunition. Perhaps whenever we have a problem where Openreach are negligent or careless (call it what you want), we should send a copy of the problem directly to the CEO, asking for a response

[#14]

I think PlusNET management structures are quite flat.  I don't think it is a matter of the CEO does not know about or understand the issues.  Some comments have been posted here stating that these matters are not his responsibility / role to deal with.
One would agree that individual instances are not his responsibility, however where does the responsibility for dealing with repeated same issue profile with a supplier lay?  The profile of failures are endemic within BTOR and are damaging PlusNet's reputation.  At what point does such systematic failure become the CEO's responsibility to address?
Only a few days to Andy's first anniversary - I wonder if he will treat us to a "12 months in" blog?

[#15]

Quote from: friendinneed

I think it unfair only to blame PlusNet CEO for failing to take Openreach to task.

Well I don't. There are staff who access this forum that have the opportunity & can & do report directly to him (so we were told). In any event, if he was seriously concerned about what was happening down at the coalface he'd ensure that the reporting structure made him fully aware of the repeated problems, a great number of which are as the result of the failings of one of their suppliers - namely Openreach, who of course are part of the BT Group as is Plusnet. Makes you wonder doesn't it?