yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox

[#1]

Subject line says it all really.  This latest one looks like an EVRI delivery message but it is most definitely not from EVRI.  I've just reported it to:

1) [email protected]

2) [email protected]

Also, marked the offending message as spam via the webmail interface.

Can anyone from Plusnet (@plusnettony?) reassure us mere mortal users that they are trying to fix what ever has become broken with the spam filters?

[#2]

The most recent false EVRI message to us was also not marked with  X_Spam Yes

despite containing the hallmarks of a fake sender :

Authentication-Results: mail.enmail.co;
	dkim=none;
	spf=softfail (mail.enmail.co: 217.16.223.153 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of [email protected]) [email protected];
	dmarc=none
Received: from BsveLwbSgA (gun-ghluasad-80-80-185-185.hebrides.net [80.80.185.185] (may be forged))

[#3]

These things are looked at, yes. 

[#4]

Many spam messages that pass through the system undetected lack the email header section for :

Authentication-Results: ( DKIM / SPF / DMARC )