Please post evidence of postini false positives here
And another one that's just started getting a very ridiculously low score rather than just a low(ish) score.
Quote Envelope-to: mandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:41:31 +0000
Received: from exprod5mx248.postini.com ([64.18.0.168] helo=psmtp.com)
by pih-sunmxcore14.plus.net with smtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1JIUQc-0002Pa-Ho
for mandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:41:31 +0000
Received: from source ([212.21.100.154]) by exprod5mx248.postini.com ([64.18.4.14]) with SMTP;
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:41:28 PST
From: "M and M Direct" <mandm@mandmdirectmail.com>
Subject: More lines added and massive reductions at M and M Direct.com
To: mandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_2emsgsadvnqw3nerasdf";
charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: feedback@mandmdirect.com
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:41:07 +0000
X-e-MSG-email: [EMAIL]->MANDM@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com<-[EMAIL]
X-e-MSG-email_id: [MID]->20888<-[MID]
X-e-MSG-Info-1: This email messages has been delivered by e-MSG.co.uk
X-e-MSG-Info-2: We operate a strict anti-spam policy, if you believe you
should not have
X-e-MSG-Info-3: received this email please visit
http://www.e-MSG.co.uk/feedback.php?email_id=20888
X-Mailer: e-MSG.co.uk
X-pstn-neptune: 1/1/1.00/90
X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.08697/99.19409 CV:99.9000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:95.5423 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <mandm@mandmdirectmail.com> [20/1]
Message-ID: <E1JIUQc-0002Pa-Ho@pih-sunmxcore14.plus.net>
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-Agent-Received: from PN POP My_Postinied_PN_Account (mail.plus.net); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:17:53 +0000
X-Agent-Junk-Probability: 0
Another one as a direct result of the recent PN changes. Spam score of 97.97078 (meaning 98% NOT spam) but marked as spam by PN 
Quote Envelope-to: rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:11:22 +0000
Received: from exprod5mx234.postini.com ([64.18.0.120] helo=psmtp.com)
by pih-sunmxcore18.plus.net with smtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1JJgsb-0006Ol-IK
for rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:11:21 +0000
Received: from source ([209.123.82.21]) by exprod5mx234.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:11:20 EST
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=pmailuk.com; q=dns; s=grahamcrackers;
b=cKbWkRpGcOJA9uOJi6AoRSP7dvbOwlAwraEX+gUfkZYTBkJA87Wfmv6T65Da
PrFrv0+MlV9KZaK3US3kudFlWRwan/lZ+1fYr6IxsSMiy/bO+5b7uvwak
ugeJcQjxZXbP3Ayw45aT8YCv+d2qL48Noy7YkHZvFP4v+S3SaFGhCs=;
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:11:20 -0500 (EST)
From: "Rockinbeerfest, RBF Festivals" <rbf@rbf.pmailuk.com>
To: rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Message-ID: <2067367.5162411201576280292.JavaMail.root@ptmail1.pt.local>
Subject: Cream of Hendrix & CRF 08 Dates Confirmed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-CampaignID: patrontechnology-6700
X-CampaignEmailID: AeiSl-eNodyhNuq4ax3yB-q5b_w9
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:97.97078/99.90000 CV:99.9000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:81.4829 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p M c
X-pstn-addresses: from <rbf@rbf.pmailuk.com> [20/1]
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-Agent-Received: from PN POP My_Postinied_PN_Account (mail.plus.net); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:59:33 +0000
X-Agent-Junk-Probability: 0
Just another of several messages with a ridiculously low spam score for no good reason:
Quote Envelope-to: tandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:03 +0000
Received: from exprod5mx241.postini.com ([64.18.0.161] helo=psmtp.com)
by pih-sunmxcore12.plus.net with smtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1JJopq-0006Ip-NW
for tandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:03 +0000
Received: from source ([195.140.185.250]) by exprod5mx241.postini.com ([64.18.4.11]) with SMTP;
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:41:00 PST
Received: from app13.muc.ec-messenger.com (app13.muc.ec-messenger.com [172.16.8.43])
by mta21.muc.ec-messenger.com (READY) with ESMTP id 0CEC5AC28A
for <tandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Thompson & Morgan <tm-newsletter@thompson-morgan.com>
Reply-To: Thompson & Morgan <ccare@thompson-morgan.com>
To: tandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Message-ID: <14283080.1201606860037.ecMessenger@newsletter.thompson-morgan.com>
Subject: Unique Blue Fuchsia Available in a Half Price Collection
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-eC-messenger-mid: 400132206
X-eC-messenger-cid: 527
X-eC-messenger-sender-domain: bounce.newsletter.thompson-morgan.com
X-eC-messenger-email: tandm@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
X-pstn-neptune: 9/9/1.00/90
X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.09546/99.24621 CV:99.9000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:95.5423 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <tm-newsletter@thompson-morgan.com> [20/1]
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-Agent-Received: from PN POP My_Postinied_PN_Account (mail.plus.net); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:47:17 +0000
X-Agent-Junk-Probability: 0
Quote from: mikeb Another one as a direct result of the recent PN changes. Spam score of 97.97078 (meaning 98% NOT spam) but marked as spam by PN
Quote Envelope-to: rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:11:22 +0000
Received: from exprod5mx234.postini.com ([64.18.0.120] helo=psmtp.com)
by pih-sunmxcore18.plus.net with smtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1JJgsb-0006Ol-IK
for rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:11:21 +0000
Received: from source ([209.123.82.21]) by exprod5mx234.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:11:20 EST
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=pmailuk.com; q=dns; s=grahamcrackers;
b=cKbWkRpGcOJA9uOJi6AoRSP7dvbOwlAwraEX+gUfkZYTBkJA87Wfmv6T65Da
PrFrv0+MlV9KZaK3US3kudFlWRwan/lZ+1fYr6IxsSMiy/bO+5b7uvwak
ugeJcQjxZXbP3Ayw45aT8YCv+d2qL48Noy7YkHZvFP4v+S3SaFGhCs=;
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:11:20 -0500 (EST)
From: "Rockinbeerfest, RBF Festivals" <rbf@rbf.pmailuk.com>
To: rbf@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Message-ID: <2067367.5162411201576280292.JavaMail.root@ptmail1.pt.local>
Subject: Cream of Hendrix & CRF 08 Dates Confirmed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-CampaignID: patrontechnology-6700
X-CampaignEmailID: AeiSl-eNodyhNuq4ax3yB-q5b_w9
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S:97.97078/99.90000 CV:99.9000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:81.4829 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p M c
X-pstn-addresses: from <rbf@rbf.pmailuk.com> [20/1]
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-Agent-Received: from PN POP My_Postinied_PN_Account (mail.plus.net); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:59:33 +0000
X-Agent-Junk-Probability: 0
I might be missing something obvious but I can't see why that's getting marked as spam even following the recent changes
Edit: moment of stupidity. I can see why now!
M:81.4829
Totally brilliant this one. This is daily digest report from a reputable festival (i.e. music) website forum and not only has it been given a ridiculously low score on this particular occasion but it's also apparently top quality p0rN 
so PN tagged it as spam !!! Any subsequent messages were presumably dumped/rejected as well just for good measure.
Well, I can assure you all that I've had a real good close look on the off chance that I've perhaps missed something *really* good in today's digest but unfortunately there are absolutely definitely no t*ts, b*ms, appendages various or anything even remotely smutty and entertaining to be seen anywhere in this TEXT ONLY message Not really anything remotely smutty or otherwise that risque in the text either other than the usual innuendo that you get in general banter on a forum.
Mind you, someone did actually finish their post with "x" so that's obviously a big no-no then. I guess Mr.Postini must have noted the excessive use of overly red lipstick or something
I'm quite disappointed that I didn't find anything remotely naughty in Mr.Postini's definition of top quality p0rN !
so PN tagged it as spam !!! Any subsequent messages were presumably dumped/rejected as well just for good measure. Well, I can assure you all that I've had a real good close look on the off chance that I've perhaps missed something *really* good in today's digest but unfortunately there are absolutely definitely no t*ts, b*ms, appendages various or anything even remotely smutty and entertaining to be seen anywhere in this TEXT ONLY message
Not really anything remotely smutty or otherwise that risque in the text either other than the usual innuendo that you get in general banter on a forum.Mind you, someone did actually finish their post with "x" so that's obviously a big no-no then. I guess Mr.Postini must have noted the excessive use of overly red lipstick or something
I'm quite disappointed
Quote Envelope-to: efests@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:10:08 +0000
Received: from exprod5mx243.postini.com ([64.18.0.163] helo=psmtp.com)
by pih-sunmxcore14.plus.net with smtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1JJe3D-00018r-2M
for efests@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:10:07 +0000
Received: from source ([194.116.175.220]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx243.postini.com ([64.18.4.11]) with SMTP;
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:10:04 PST
Received: (qmail 25262 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2008 00:10:03 +0000
Message-ID: <20080129001003.25259.qmail@efestivals.co.uk>
To: efests@My_Postinied_PN_Account.plus.com
Subject: Your daily new topics digest ( Festival Forums )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:10:03 +0000
From: "Festival Forums" <forums@efestivals.co.uk>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: IPB PHP Mailer
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-pstn-2strike: clear
X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0
X-pstn-levels: (S: 1.45489/99.87965 CV:99.9000 R:95.9108 P: 0.0059 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r P m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <forums@efestivals.co.uk> [20/1]
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-Agent-Received: from PN POP My_Postinied_PN_Account (mail.plus.net); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:13:13 +0000
X-Agent-Junk-Probability: 0
Maybe so ... but even if it was something a lil naughty, assuming that it's legal and not unsolicited then it's not really up to postini to act as censor or moral guardian is it ? What people choose to view or read (within reason of course and therefore within the law) is entirely their own business.
And I'm pretty p*ssed off that not only were they 110% wrong but they also potentially prevented me from receiving other messages as well because that one should have been rejected for whatever reason postini think was reasonable.
And I'm pretty p*ssed off that not only were they 110% wrong but they also potentially prevented me from receiving other messages as well because that one should have been rejected for whatever reason postini think was reasonable.
Quote from: mikeb it's not really up to postini to act as censor or moral guardian is it ? What people choose to view or read (within reason of course and therefore within the law) is entirely their own business.
To be fair, Postini do give users control over the category filters. Some employers are going to want to try and block anything naughty from people at work, etc.
It's a matter of balance, isn't it, between keeping us clean of spam and risking a few false-positives on the one hand, or tolerating a level of spam to avoid wrongly tagged mails on the other? I must say, they're now getting it about 100% right for me
