cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Terms and conditions

RobDickson
Grafter
Posts: 633
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎06-08-2007

Terms and conditions

I know I ought to get out more, but has anybody else noticed that the numbering on PlusNet's terms and conditions is wrong?
Paragraphs 37, 38 and 43 seem to refer to the wrong paragraphs.
http://www.plus.net/info2/legal/index.html
7 REPLIES
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: ‎30-07-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

did you mean para 45
RobDickson
Grafter
Posts: 633
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎06-08-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

Yes. I should have checked my numbers before posting a comment.
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: ‎30-07-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

why PN dont
RobDickson
Grafter
Posts: 633
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎06-08-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

Sorry, I don't understand your last post.
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: ‎30-07-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

missed my punctuation out, was in a hurry
Why, PN dont.
does that make more sense? as it was just after your post
Quote
Yes. I should have checked my numbers before posting a comment.
RobDickson
Grafter
Posts: 633
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎06-08-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

Yes, that makes much more sense now. Sorry for being slow.
Mand
Grafter
Posts: 5,560
Thanks: 1
Registered: ‎05-04-2007

Re: Terms and conditions

Hi guys,
I've raised this to our content team to fix. Thanks for pointing it out.