cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Firefox 52 has blown it

7up
Community Veteran
Posts: 15,830
Thanks: 1,587
Fixes: 17
Registered: ‎01-08-2007

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it


@Oldjim wrote:

agreed to an extent but if they had removed it there would have been a mass exodus of users given the number of sites which are still in the dark ages


Dunno, more and more sites and people are against flash because its such a pain.

I'm on a single core machine at present and every time a flash advert pops up on a website my CPU hits 100% and stays there. It had a time and a place and those are long out of sight now.

I need a new signature... i'm bored of the old one!
NorthPole
Aspiring Pro
Posts: 255
Thanks: 39
Fixes: 6
Registered: ‎05-07-2013

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

The links on the Plusnet page Oldjim refers to and 'in-browser' PDFs both work as before for me in Firefox 52 (32-bit). The insecure password nag is rather a pain, though, as it appears every time I login to my router's admin functions.

VileReynard
Hero
Posts: 12,616
Thanks: 582
Fixes: 20
Registered: ‎01-09-2007

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

I shall install Firefox 52 as soon as it becomes available on my platform.

Yet another nail in the Java coffin.
Hopefully, java programmers will shuffle off elsewhere, not before time....

"In The Beginning Was The Word, And The Word Was Aardvark."

NorthPole
Aspiring Pro
Posts: 255
Thanks: 39
Fixes: 6
Registered: ‎05-07-2013

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it


@Anonymous wrote:

This is what you see using FF 52 when visiting an non HTTPS site using forms.


I've now found out how to completely disable that warning, by setting signon.autofillForms.http to 'true' in Firefox's about:config page - see here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/5y9fm6/firefox_52_autocomplete_now_shows_insecure/

Also, if you want to re-enable all the plug-ins that are automatically disabled in Firefox 52, see here:

http://winaero.com/blog/firefox-52-npapi-plugins-support-disabled/

Obviously, you do either or both of these at your own risk!

EDIT - I have subsequently found that re-enabling the blocked plug-ins seems to create some issues when visiting secure sites, so perhaps not a good idea after all.

Strat
Community Veteran
Posts: 31,320
Thanks: 1,609
Fixes: 565
Registered: ‎14-04-2007

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

I'm running Waterfox, currently V51.0.1 (64-bit).

It will be interesting to see what flavour of V52 I and other Waterfox users get.

Windows 10 Firefox 109.0 (64-bit)
To argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine
jab1
Legend
Posts: 17,119
Thanks: 5,496
Fixes: 255
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

@Strat - I was thinking that, too. Might have to do a bit of tweaking, but for what I do, hopefully not much.Smiley

John
Tagger
Grafter
Posts: 28
Thanks: 17
Registered: ‎28-02-2017

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it


@Oldjim wrote:

try this page as I have reported a problem https://www.plus.net/help/broadband/ in Plusnet Feedback


Doesn't work at all for me.  None of the links expand.  Had to switch to IE11.

Mav
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22,397
Thanks: 4,736
Fixes: 515
Registered: ‎06-04-2007

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

Moderator's note by Mike (Mav)

Several posts released from Spam Filter and duplicates removed

Forum Moderator and Customer
Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear - Mark Twain
He who feared he would not succeed sat still

VileReynard
Hero
Posts: 12,616
Thanks: 582
Fixes: 20
Registered: ‎01-09-2007

Re: Firefox 52 has blown it

FF52 works perfectly as provided - no parameter mangling needed.

Works for https and http sites.

"In The Beginning Was The Word, And The Word Was Aardvark."