Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Anyone know why...?
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Other forums
- :
- Tech Help - Software/Hardware etc
- :
- Anyone know why...?
Anyone know why...?
18-03-2009 2:14 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
...If I type, say, whsmith.co.uk into the address bar of IE7 it never seems to load the relevant page but typing www.whsmith.co.uk does?
This doesn't happen for all .co.uk sites as typing bbc.co.uk works just as well as www.bbc.co.uk.
This doesn't happen for all .co.uk sites as typing bbc.co.uk works just as well as www.bbc.co.uk.
Forum Moderator and Customer
Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear - Mark Twain
He who feared he would not succeed sat still
5 REPLIES 5
Re: Anyone know why...?
18-03-2009 8:17 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
on Firefox I just typed whsmith dont think I have used it before and it found it OK
Re: Anyone know why...?
18-03-2009 8:49 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
As pierre_pierre says, some browsers will complete the address for you. But generally, using 'www' at the start of a web-server's domain name is just a convention. The site owner does not have to use it, they can leave it out or use any other text.
If a site works without 'www' or with something else instead of 'www', it's because they've set up their DNS and/or network routing to detect that their network is receiving web traffic, which is then directed to their web-server(s).
If a site works without 'www' or with something else instead of 'www', it's because they've set up their DNS and/or network routing to detect that their network is receiving web traffic, which is then directed to their web-server(s).
Re: Anyone know why...?
18-03-2009 9:06 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
It's because whsmith haven't configured their DNS/web servers correctly:
Note that they are pointing to different addresses. Tracert shows they are on completely different networks. I suspect they've moved their website and forgotten to update some of the DNS entries.
C:\Documents and Settings\John>nslookup whsmith.co.uk
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: whsmith.co.uk
Address: 194.176.201.195
C:\Documents and Settings\John>nslookup www.whsmith.co.uk
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www.whsmith.co.uk
Address: 62.73.143.120
Note that they are pointing to different addresses. Tracert shows they are on completely different networks. I suspect they've moved their website and forgotten to update some of the DNS entries.
jelv (a.k.a Spoon Whittler) Why I have left Plusnet (warning: long post!) Broadband: Andrews & Arnold Home::1 (FTTC 80/20) Line rental: Pulse 8 Home Line Rental (£14.40/month) Mobile: iD mobile (£4/month) |
Re: Anyone know why...?
18-03-2009 9:58 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I suspect you're right, however there's no absolute requirement that a domain name with the host part omitted has to point to a web-server.
It might be poor practice, but could they also have a valid reason for having similar DNS entries point to different networks?
(I'm thinking of the occasions where a business may use a third-party for web hosting, but may also need access to their own network via the internet for other purposes. It would be sensible to use different domain names for something like that, but nobody is going to force them to do so.)
It might be poor practice, but could they also have a valid reason for having similar DNS entries point to different networks?
(I'm thinking of the occasions where a business may use a third-party for web hosting, but may also need access to their own network via the internet for other purposes. It would be sensible to use different domain names for something like that, but nobody is going to force them to do so.)
Re: Anyone know why...?
22-03-2009 9:58 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
A common convention is to include in the DNS zone file a line of the form:
www.domainname.com. ; IN CNAME domainname.com.
which translates any reference to www.domainname.com into a reference to domainname.com which is, in turn, then looked up
But as alanb says, using a www prefix is only a convention, albeit a strongly followed convention
www.domainname.com. ; IN CNAME domainname.com.
which translates any reference to www.domainname.com into a reference to domainname.com which is, in turn, then looked up
But as alanb says, using a www prefix is only a convention, albeit a strongly followed convention
Zen from May 17. PN Business account from 2004 - 2017
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page