cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

andyrogers
Grafter
Posts: 131
Registered: 30-07-2007

Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

Bob
My free Plus.com email account has been transferred to Ironport successfully it seems thanks.
Just one question so far, if Iam sending and email from my F9 account to a plus.com, should this be scanned by Ironport or should this just get delivered direct to the users mailbox without being scanned?
Iam asking as I have tried sending from plus.com to plus.com and their are no Ironport headers, also the same goes from F9 to plus.com their are no Ironport headers in the email.
With the postini system all messages were filtered via Postini.
Should this behaviour be happening?
Thanks
Andy
5 REPLIES
Community Gaffer
Community Gaffer
Posts: 12,799
Thanks: 630
Fixes: 62
Registered: 04-04-2007

Re: Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

It should be scanned. Do you have spam filtering switched off on the .plus.com account? If you do then your DNS will have been changed to bypass IronPort. This is a little different to how things worked with Postini.

Bob Pullen
Plusnet Products Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵

andyrogers
Grafter
Posts: 131
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

Hi Bob
My Spam settings are switched on with my plus.com address.
Andy
Community Gaffer
Community Gaffer
Posts: 12,799
Thanks: 630
Fixes: 62
Registered: 04-04-2007

Re: Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

I've sent you a PM Andy. I've just tried sending an email from a Plusnet account to a Force 9 one and it went through IronPort.
This one was from Webmail:
Return-path: <me@privacy.plus.com>
Envelope-to: me@privacy.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:14:36 +0000
Received: from [212.159.7.33] (helo=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net)
     by fhw-sunmxcore21.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1L5r0G-0003rf-KL
     for me@privacy.force9.co.uk; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:14:36 +0000
Authentication-Results: mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=212.159.0.97;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.159.0.97;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=212.159.0.97;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="postmaster@pih-cgirelay03.plus.net";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-SBRS: 5.3
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0AAFvGLknUnwBhmWdsb2JhbACSVIEVAQEBAQEICwoHEb0qgn0
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5447"; a="2893939"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,678,1220223600";
     d="scan'208";a="2893939"
Received: from pih-cgirelay03.plus.net ([212.159.0.97])
     by mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2008 00:14:36 +0000
Received: from [212.159.6.52] (helo=webmail.plus.net)
     by pih-cgirelay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
     (envelope-from <me@privacy.plus.com>)
     id 1L5r0F-0004g5-Lb
     for me@privacy.force9.co.uk; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:14:35 +0000
Received: from 80.229.150.170
     (SquirrelMail authenticated user bobpullen)
     by webmail.plus.net with HTTP;
     Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:14:28 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <16021.80.229.150.170.1227831268.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:14:28 -0000 (UTC)
From: me@privacy.plus.com
To: me@privacy.force9.co.uk
User-Agent: SquirrelMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-pn-pstn: Spam 0
Subject: Sent from webmail

And this one was sent via the relays:
Return-path: <me@privacy.plus.com>
Envelope-to: me@privacy.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:15:59 +0000
Received: from [212.159.7.33] (helo=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net)
     by fhw-sunmxcore05.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1L5r1b-0004kN-2Q
     for me@privacy.force9.co.uk; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:15:59 +0000
Authentication-Results: mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=212.159.14.19;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.159.14.19;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=212.159.14.19;
     receiver=mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net;
     envelope-from="me@privacy.plus.com";
     x-sender="postmaster@pih-relay06.plus.net";
     x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-SBRS: 4.7
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoUBAFvGLknUnw4Tk2dsb2JhbACMXQGFdoEVAQEBAQcLCgkRA70nB4J2
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5447"; a="2894283"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,678,1220223600";
     d="scan'208";a="2894283"
Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.19])
     by mx.ptn-ipin01.plus.net with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2008 00:15:50 +0000
Received: from [80.229.150.170] (helo=relays)
     by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1L5r13-0005rb-TX
     for me@privacy.force9.co.uk; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:15:50 +0000
Message-Id: <E1L5r13-0005rb-TX@pih-relay06.plus.net>
From: me@privacy.plus.com

Bob Pullen
Plusnet Products Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵

andyrogers
Grafter
Posts: 131
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

Bob
I have sent you a PM with a copy of one of the headers.
Thanks
Andy
Community Gaffer
Community Gaffer
Posts: 12,799
Thanks: 630
Fixes: 62
Registered: 04-04-2007

Re: Plusnet To Plusnet (Internal) Emails On Ironport

Thanks Andy, as we've discovered it looks like it was just a case of the Webmail relays caching old DNS data. As I  understand it, everything's OK now?
Give me a shout if you have any further problems.

Bob Pullen
Plusnet Products Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵