cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Edge protection - question answered

pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Edge protection - question answered

as a personal investigation re missed e-mails I have turned edge protection off, I do get a small number of obvious spam not marked, but looking at the headers they seem to go through Ironport, is this so., still nothing in my spam boxes though
Quote
Received: from [212.159.7.38] (helo=mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net)
  by fhw-sunmxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1L7mzj-0005Yu-5q
  for mr@xxxxxxx.idps.co.uk; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:22:03 +0000
Authentication-Results: mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=98.136.44.42;
  receiver=mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net;
  envelope-from="boty1marc@yahoo.co.th";
  x-sender="boty1marc@yahoo.co.th";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=98.136.44.42;
  receiver=mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net;
  envelope-from="boty1marc@yahoo.co.th";
  x-sender="boty1marc@yahoo.co.th";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=98.136.44.42;
  receiver=mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net;
  envelope-from="boty1marc@yahoo.co.th";
  x-sender="postmaster@n78.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-SBRS: 4.5
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av3/APzQNUliiCwqkWdsb2JhbAAEAQGCPC41h1SBOhp2CYI5g0kBAQEBFAoHEQOGJqpJCIEiCItsBQIBgXIDCH+BWw
X-IPAS: Level1
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5452"; a="268278"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,708,1220223600";
   d="scan'208";a="268278"
Received: from n78.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.42])
  by mx.ptn-ipin03.plus.net with SMTP; 03 Dec 2008 08:22:02 +0000
Received: from [216.252.122.219] by n78.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2008 08:22:00 -0000
Received: from [124.108.115.242] by t4.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2008 08:22:00 -0000
Received: from [124.108.114.81] by t1.bullet.mail.sg1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2008 08:21:57 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp101.mail.sg1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2008 08:21:59 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 95294.10188.bm@omp101.mail.sg1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 49660 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Dec 2008 08:21:58 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.th;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:ReceivedCheesyate:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=x/YfOkO9ZtwOpzEACHByJ1NMZ9H6vyaaDBjMmBBgeOr3et6eBWtcfZ9PveBb7hP+Ewk3xkqdNoBZswbloK8W69f+kIv6+zQhzrQnRegJh76vIOEJ1scc9w16Fz1KD1/BBe7rnEe78g698sSP+VL5Qtc6CP/+jkMPr+oIb6mnfQM=;
X-YMail-OSG: ngOsKrAVM1nR2ew8un49FTQUko4Zv_gEUw8wmdPFMuGQiuNSA9sg6Iq.0iGXatvEM2L5RvqTxAcF6jQmcezHC5I_c3WgnZHZaXSTmeuhslGaYSFgSXwt9gKVb7_y4pHOe1Kor8fdwTp4d9xDw0IGdFfa44xr
Received: from [41.207.16.117] by web76015.mail.sg1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:21:58 ICT
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:21:58 +0700 (ICT)
From: Marc Roland Boty <boty1marc@yahoo.co.th>
Reply-To: botymarc0@yahoo.com
To: boty1marc@yahoo.co.th
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <685842.49587.qm@web76015.mail.sg1.yahoo.com>
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-PN-Virus-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v4.00)
X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v4.00)
Subject: IMPORTANT
X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 8.0.176 [270.9.13/1825]
3 REPLIES
Superuser
Superuser
Posts: 8,876
Thanks: 411
Fixes: 36
Registered: 06-04-2007

Re: Edge protection

Yes that has been through IronPort and was marked as Spam 1 (Header X-pn-pstn: Spam 1), i.e. definitely spam.
The subject line has not been tagged as [-SPAM-] nor (from your comment) has it been moved to the Spam Folder. Could you confirm that the spam setting for the domain this was sent to (see the Envelope-to: header near the top of the original message) has Add [-SPAM-] to the subject line (Recommended) and Move to the Spam Folder (Recommended) radio buttons selected?
David
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: Edge protection

Strange those two tick boxes were not as I had them before the migration, have now changed it back.  It could be that I had been through no spam filtering and then back to  filter and no edge
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: Edge protection

the last lot - only three - went into their respective spam boxes