cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Non inclusive rebranding.

Highlighted
jab1
Hero
Posts: 3,143
Thanks: 999
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@Minesapint  +1 :thumbsup:

John
Minivanman
Seasoned Hero
Posts: 9,795
Thanks: 3,097
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎04-11-2014

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@Minesapint 

"... and sick to death of people who have nothing better to do than worry about whether something that nobody should really care less about is upsetting somebody else who should have something better to do"

Not sure what to make of that, are you saying that we should not complain or comment unless it affects us directly. If so, where's the fun in that? 

For a start, poor old Piers Morgan would not have a television show in the morning. :tongue:

As for being stereotypically male, old(ish), grumpy, un-politically correct - we could be twins... but there's a lot of us!

RobPN
Aspiring Hero
Posts: 2,391
Thanks: 854
Fixes: 4
Registered: ‎17-05-2013

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.


@Minivanman wrote:

@Minesapint 

"... and sick to death of people who have nothing better to do than worry about whether something that nobody should really care less about is upsetting somebody else who should have something better to do"

Not sure what to make of that, are you saying that we should not complain or comment unless it affects us directly. If so, where's the fun in that? 


ICBW but the way I read that I think @Minesapint  was having a dig at all the snowflakes who keep making decisions such as sacking fireman Sam ... :wink:

jab1
Hero
Posts: 3,143
Thanks: 999
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

That's exactly how I read it, too - and s/he's :wink:perfectly correct.

John
Minivanman
Seasoned Hero
Posts: 9,795
Thanks: 3,097
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎04-11-2014

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

Ah right, thanks guys for handing me the right end of the stick. :thumbsup:

RobPN
Aspiring Hero
Posts: 2,391
Thanks: 854
Fixes: 4
Registered: ‎17-05-2013

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.


@jab1 wrote:

... and s/he's :wink:perfectly correct.


It might be safer to say 'they're' perfectly correct.  (before a certain someone jumps up and calls you a bigot)  :wink:

PS @Minesapint  no comments were aimed at you!

jab1
Hero
Posts: 3,143
Thanks: 999
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

As if I care.:grin:

John
Minesapint
Pro
Posts: 280
Thanks: 186
Registered: ‎10-11-2015

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.


@jab1 wrote:

That's exactly how I read it, too - and s/he's :wink:perfectly correct.


I did say "male" etc.

(Are we still allowed to say that? :cheesy:)

As for the rest. Exactly that!

jab1
Hero
Posts: 3,143
Thanks: 999
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@Minesapint I know you said 'male' - yes, we are still allowed to say it - I think.

That's why I 'winked'.:wink:

John
Minesapint
Pro
Posts: 280
Thanks: 186
Registered: ‎10-11-2015

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@jab1 

That thinking stuffs dangerous! :crazy:

And I always miss winks. I "read" 'em as smiles.

jab1
Hero
Posts: 3,143
Thanks: 999
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@Minesapint Ah, but thinking proves you've still got a working brain, even if it hasn't been modified by the thought police.:smiley:

I'll make sure I include 'wink' in (brackets) next time.:grin:

John
Minesapint
Pro
Posts: 280
Thanks: 186
Registered: ‎10-11-2015

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@jab1 

:thumbsup:

I just hope them there thought police are using an all inclusive, and non-sterotypical, mascot. 

TTman
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 467
Thanks: 272
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎26-01-2019

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

Tonight I was watching Look North on the box and when they said they were going to their LGBT correspondant I took the dog for a Walk:rolleyes:

Minivanman
Seasoned Hero
Posts: 9,795
Thanks: 3,097
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎04-11-2014

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

Well there you go, a gay man reporting on gay affairs.

What could possibly go wrong and who could possibly object. :rolleyes:

TTman
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 467
Thanks: 272
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎26-01-2019

Re: Non inclusive rebranding.

@Minivanman  Dont know if the reporter ws gay only he was in charge of reporting LGBT matters.:smiley: