cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

Community Veteran
Posts: 18,547
Thanks: 193
Registered: 12-08-2007

New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

We all remember the death of Dr. David Kelly under suspicious circumstances and the secrecy surrounding his death.  A  group of eminent medical experts are challenging the official version of his death and an intriguing article has been written about it.
Dr. Kelly
37 REPLIES
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: Conspiracy Theory - Dr. Kelly

Not a very good thread to start on this forum IMHO, Especially after all the carry on last time, Yes you know what I mean and I'm positive others will agree with me.
Community Veteran
Posts: 18,547
Thanks: 193
Registered: 12-08-2007

Re: Conspiracy Theory - Dr. Kelly

We have discussed this before the new evidence, and did so in a civilised manner.  I think most of us can do so again.  
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

We? If it's been discussed before then It cant be new evidence, What makes " We" Different from the last fiasco? I seem to recall a GANG of members previously Ganging up on wildrose52 because of conspiracy theory threads. What makes this thread any different?
Community Veteran
Posts: 18,547
Thanks: 193
Registered: 12-08-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

Based on the new evidence it looks as if the government could reopen the investigation into Dr. Kelly's death.
New Investigation
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

Notice you have now changed the title from Conspiracy Theory to New Investigation Dr.Kelly May I ask why?
198kHz
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 3,217
Thanks: 253
Fixes: 7
Registered: 30-07-2008

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

I see where you're coming from, Steve, but I think artmo's post is perfectly valid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10294009.stm
Quote
Mr Clarke could decide to launch a public inquiry into Dr Kelly's death and it is understood conversations have taken place between ministers in the new coalition government, including Attorney General Dominic Grieve, about such a possibility.

I don't think Ken Clarke and Dominic Grieve are usually persuaded by conspiracy theories.
Not young enough to know everything
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

Disagree there, Theres a place for Conspiracy Theories And based on MY experience here this forum is not the place for it, Thanks for the reply all the same, Atleast some members have the respect  to reply to me in a civilised manner!!
Community Veteran
Posts: 7,153
Thanks: 54
Fixes: 2
Registered: 30-08-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

If the government think its a valid topic for discussion, I really can't see the problem in it being discussed here. Maybe we should get away from worrying about whether it should be discussed and let those who want to continue in peace. If others find the topic unpalatable, stay away from it and stop trying to do the mods job for them.
Experience; is something you gain, just after you needed it most.

When faced with two choices, simply toss a coin. It works not because it settles the question for you. But because in that brief moment while the coin is in the air. You suddenly know what you are hoping for.
Community Veteran
Posts: 18,547
Thanks: 193
Registered: 12-08-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

Thanks for the supportive comments.  I think if a new investigation is conducted we will see new evidence come to light that will prove Hutton was no more than a whitewash. We shall see.
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

I'm not trying to do the mods job I'm just stating the facts!
scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Registered: 03-11-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

i believe because this is a main stream media story it was likely to be posted on here by one of the members, where what i saw from standing back and just following wild's threads i noted he/she was posting on some topics that was of very limited reader/believer base and more appropriate to start 10 threads a day in a conspiracy specialist forum.
i saw some very good opposition arguments in those threads but wild just seemed to take them as dig's and not take them on board to see the bigger picture on there conspiracy's and i believe this is what angered the forum members and then turned into a mod vs  member war.
any ways asbo hides from the mods and if you find me i will have tea and biscuits at the ready  Smiley an no there not dog biscuits
Steve
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 6,696
Thanks: 249
Registered: 13-07-2009

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

This was originally titled " Conspiracy Thread " So it's no different to wildrose 52's threads with what she believed strongly in is what makes us all different!! Now as ive said im not defending wildrose 52 BUT This to me makes anyone who posts in this thread look very silly if you ask me with past experience of conspiracy threads, I seem to recall a member putting a link in their Sig where conspiracy threads should be talked about.
scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Registered: 03-11-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

yes where multiple a day threads are started on conspiracy's, i placed that sig there as i wasn't taking part in wild's threads but felt they would be better discussing 10 threads a day of conspiracy's in a dedicated conspiracy theory forum.
THIS so called conspiracy may have effected directly the lives of many dead solders family's, where most of wild's was some very WILD conspiracy's not effecting the mass public.
this is why i didn't get involved the first time round and hence why i pointed wild in friendly manner to a dedicated forum for her topics where an audience of 100's that believed or dis believed was prepared to discuss her niche theory's
any way am out in till this thread returns to a discussion of the new evidence found/ new theory being put forward, rather than slating artmo for pointing out a main stream story
Community Veteran
Posts: 38,251
Thanks: 937
Fixes: 56
Registered: 15-06-2007

Re: New Investigation - Dr. Kelly

I know that this is Chit Chat where off-topic posts are allowed (nay encouraged  Grin) but can we please keep any further posts in this thread to more or less the original topic and not deviate into past history and other posters style of posting.
Jim the moderator