cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

GCSE - in maths now easier

Community Veteran
Posts: 38,253
Thanks: 938
Fixes: 56
Registered: 15-06-2007

GCSE - in maths now easier

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article4052837.ece
In the hard copy they gave some examples and it was amazing how much I had forgotten from when I took 'O' Level in the 1950's - I had to think a bit to solve them.
23 REPLIES
nadger
Rising Star
Posts: 4,498
Thanks: 46
Registered: 13-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

Ah, dear old July 1951 which was the first year of GCE exams  Cry
Captainkirk
Grafter
Posts: 92
Registered: 07-12-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

I sat a GCSE in maths 3 years ago (intermediate paper) - the questions were not easy -  I can remember some of them looking very similar to the examples given - I hate to say it but not having used algebra since I took the exam I would have to go back and look at a book in order to answer those examples!! 
Tracey.
Cliff_Jordan
Grafter
Posts: 228
Registered: 01-08-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

It was 1963 for me and although I vaguely recognise the form of the questions I'm not certain if I would know where to start now - and to think I went on to get  'A' Level Maths as well Embarrassed
Cliff
James
Grafter
Posts: 21,036
Registered: 04-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

I believe that I did the 12th easiest GCSE Maths to date.
N/A

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

12 years ago then?
Must've been the same one that my friend acheived a 'B' in - not bad considering he went to the exams armed only with a pencil. No calculator, ruler or protractor for him.
dgdclynx
Grafter
Posts: 187
Registered: 05-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

I will just paste this in from today's Guardian....
Without the big maths stories our numbers are plummeting
Britain has been denied a generation of experts thanks to dumbed-down teaching of what should be a magical subject
Marcus du Sautoy The Guardian, Tuesday June 3 2008
What is the point of studying mathematics? I have never used a sine or cosine in my everyday life. And solving quadratic equations? Although a footballer subconsciously solves one every time he works out where to stand to volley a free kick, I don't think Wayne Rooney is using the formula he was taught in school to make his decision. So should we be worried by a new report out today claiming that the failure of mathematics education in the UK has lead to the disappearance of half a million mathematicians?
A study published by the thinktank Reform finds that since the 1980s, mathematics has been dumbed down and made so anaemic that students are being put off taking it beyond the compulsory tick in the box at GSCE. City firms have certainly noticed the evidence of a lost tribe. The great majority of the mathematicians they rely on are recruited from overseas. Countries such as China and India have realised the crucial role mathematicians play in the success of their economy and are pumping out fantastically competent mathematicians that increasingly fill the hole left in Britain. The report estimates that the cost to the UK economy since 1990 of not raising homegrown mathematicians totals a staggering £9bn.
Their analysis of exam papers from the 1950s to the present day concludes that the current generation of students are not being stretched mathematically in the same way their predecessors were. An attempt to make the mathematics more "relevant" has ended up just making it boring. The move away from rigour and logic, the bedrock of mathematics, has emasculated the subject. But it is precisely this ability to think logically that employers are so thirsty for. And it is not just the financial sphere that values such skills. Mathematics is much more than an ability to manipulate numbers and perform arithmetic computations. Trigonometry and quadratic equations are important because they teach people an analytic way of thinking that can be applied in all walks of life.
But if we want to ensure we don't lose another generation of mathematicians it must also be an inspiring subject, forming a springboard for the dive into deeper mathematics. We are being too timid in what we are challenging students with. It is like teaching someone to play a musical instrument and only making them play scales and arpeggios, never letting them listen to real music. Even if you can't yet play Bach or the blues, at least you realise what you are aiming for.
In mathematics we are missing telling the kids the big stories of maths. Students should be exposed to the wonders of four-dimensional shapes, the fascination of the primes, the mysteries of topology. One can motivate these as essential tools in modern life: they are key to the way mobile phones change voices into a stream of 0s and 1s, how credit card numbers are kept secure on the internet, how Google works. But they also have an exciting quality in their own right which, regardless of practical applications, can challenge students to see the world in new ways.
It was these big stories that turned me on to mathematics. A teacher at my comprehensive school when I was about 13 recommended a couple of books that explored maths beyond the long division of the classroom.
He pointed me towards Martin Gardner's column in Scientific American, which slipped in fascinating bits of maths on the back of puzzles. I attended the Christmas lectures at the Royal Institution, that year given by Christopher Zeeman, the first time they were ever given on maths. He made it all look so exciting I came away knowing that I wanted to be a mathematician when I grew up.
It is a lack of teachers who can tell the big stories that is part of the problem. But it is one that government is trying to address with the introduction of the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics, a coordinated attempt to enrich teachers, who can in turn inspire their pupils.
It's not as if mathematics is completely isolated in our society. There seems to be a real thirst recently for things mathematical. Last year Complicite's play A Disappearing Number about mathematics was a sell out at the Barbican in London, won the Olivier best play award and returns for a rerun this autumn. On television, Ridley Scott's Numb3rs does for maths what CSI did for forensic medicine.
Maths even has a starring role in two recent Hollywood movies, 21 and the Oxford Murders, with Kevin Spacey and Elijah Wood showing how maths can be used to break Vegas and crack crimes. And how many people sit down every morning to stimulate their brain cells with the logical challenges of the sudokus that fill our newspapers? Perhaps it is time to find innovative ways to bring this thirst for mathematical stories and games from the adult playground into the classroom and transform mathematics from geek to chic.
· Marcus du Sautoy is professor of mathematics at Wadham College, Oxford and author of Finding Moonshine
Community Veteran
Posts: 6,111
Thanks: 1
Registered: 05-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

I like maths... ironically, I actually got a better mark for it in my A-level than music, despite the fact I took the latter for my degree. Having said that, one of my recent compositions actually used A-level trigonometric transformations, so I've found some way of combining the two. And I do find some of the techniques I learnt in maths useful in everyday life... I'm a very methodical and precise person, which probably means that I'm tempted to calculate things properly when other people would just guess. For example, every so often I find myself needing to use logs - I can't think why now, but I do. They're not an advanced thing at all, but I wonder how many people do actually use things like that outside of the classroom...
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

e bye gum, sometimes you have to, but if you like Naperian, funny fela, or do you use base 10
jmd
Grafter
Posts: 2,933
Thanks: 2
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

I am no good at maths.................... never liked it at school........................... Sad

I am alright at spelling/grammar but not adding up numbers.................. mind you I only went to a Secondary Modern School [and they don't exist anymore]!
itsme
Grafter
Posts: 5,924
Thanks: 1
Registered: 07-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

Quote from: Be3G
......... but I wonder how many people do actually use things like that outside of the classroom...

All the time when users complain about they broadband speed and start to quote attenuation and SNR figures as dB is a logarithmic function.  Grin
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

yes but how many of then know that 6Db value + 6 DB value doesnt = 12  Cool Roll eyes
itsme
Grafter
Posts: 5,924
Thanks: 1
Registered: 07-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

But 6dB x 6dB =12dB
pierre_pierre
Grafter
Posts: 19,757
Registered: 30-07-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

dont try to confuse the suckers  Cheesy
Community Veteran
Posts: 6,111
Thanks: 1
Registered: 05-04-2007

Re: GCSE - in maths now easier

Quote from: itsme
But 6dB x 6dB =12dB

Ultra-pedantic mode on:
6dB x 6 = 12dB
6dB x 6dB = something else (12dB2? Not sure what you do when squaring exponential units.)