cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Either a new energy source or a big con

Community Veteran
Posts: 38,460
Thanks: 1,028
Fixes: 62
Registered: 15-06-2007

Either a new energy source or a big con

I have been following this story for a while and yesterday was the big test.
This is one report which seems relatively factual http://pesn.com/2011/10/28/9501940_1_MW_E-Cat_Test_Successful/ and the actual report is here http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3303693.ece/BINARY/Report+Ecat+Oct28+%28pdf%29
Note that the hydrogen tank weights are in grams not kg - corrected by Rossi later
4 REPLIES
Community Veteran
Posts: 2,568
Thanks: 175
Fixes: 2
Registered: 27-05-2011

Re: Either a new energy source or a big con

Very interesting, previous cold fusion experiments have never passed peer review IMHO. But this seems to be out of the lab and into the engineering stage  Undecided
To do is to be - Neitzsche
To be is to do - Kant
do be do be do - Sinatra
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 26,690
Thanks: 1,617
Fixes: 123
Registered: 14-04-2007

Re: Either a new energy source or a big con

Hmmm.....A question was raised about the continued running of the gen sets but if it's a con it's a very elaborate one.
New sources of energy need to be and will be found. Maybe this is one of them.

Customer and Forum Moderator.

To argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine
Community Veteran
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 917
Fixes: 9
Registered: 02-08-2007

Re: Either a new energy source or a big con

If this proves to be true he will end up 10 times richer than Bill Gates !!
Community Veteran
Posts: 5,613
Thanks: 626
Fixes: 1
Registered: 21-03-2011

Re: Either a new energy source or a big con

and the name of the secret sponsor - BP; it won't see the light of day until all of the oil runs out.
Now Zen, but a +Net residue.