cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

BREXIT

RobC
Pro
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 157
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎03-12-2016

Re: BREXIT

True

Unlike @idonno and his ongoing problems with premature ejaculations in all areas,

I was waiting for the detail from the court.

 

but as its been commented on - I'll speculate a little from what I've seen.

Its likely that the court has decided there is no precedent for this to give it guidance - which it seems was one of Johnsons teams main points- no ones prosecuted this in this way before. - Accepted.

 

- the other argument Johnson appears to be relying on is the opinion that politicians in political campaigns can't be held accountable for presenting 'less than the truth' and truth (even on 'sums') should be a political decision ....

 

That second point really defines (IMO) why it should be pressed.

 

I'm quite surprised that anyone, whatever their political perspective, would support Johnson in any way.

Show us ONE just ONE real, defined benefit for the British public from Brexit

Brexit Promised cake .... But just delivers a stream of Cack
... and expects us all to just swallow it
Brexit - Built from Bovine Manure by Bots
RobPN
Aspiring Hero
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,128
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎17-05-2013

Re: BREXIT


@RobC wrote:

 

 

but as its been commented on - I'll speculate a little from what I've seen.

Its likely that the court has decided there is no precedent for this to give it guidance - which it seems was one of Johnsons teams main points- no ones prosecuted this in this way before. - Accepted.

 


AIUI, if no precedent has been set to guide the court, then the court makes it's own judgment.  Whether such a decision is appealed or not is another matter.

RobC
Pro
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 157
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎03-12-2016

Re: BREXIT

The detail yet to come out should show the reasoning.

Show us ONE just ONE real, defined benefit for the British public from Brexit

Brexit Promised cake .... But just delivers a stream of Cack
... and expects us all to just swallow it
Brexit - Built from Bovine Manure by Bots
RobPN
Aspiring Hero
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,128
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎17-05-2013

Re: BREXIT

It's clear you're not going to agree or admit that you prejudged the case, but it's also clear that a decision was made whether we know the details yet or not.

TTman
All Star
Posts: 610
Thanks: 386
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎26-01-2019

Re: BREXIT

@RobPN  Did you expect anything different from @RobC :laugh:

RobC
Pro
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 157
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎03-12-2016

Re: BREXIT


@RobC wrote:

 

 

I fail to see how anyone would NOT want what appears to be demonstrable repeated lying prosecuted in court.

 

 

Muddy your own waters all you want. The courts will decide,

and they have already decided that it should go to the next stage.

 


 

 

I absolutely believe Johnson was knowingly lying, and that it should be prosecuted

But whatever you BrexiBulls*ers claim - I did quite clearly say (read just above)

 

Its not me pre-judging or pre-empting court decisions - as anyone can see.

 

 

 

pros·e·cute

 (prŏs′ĭ-kyo͞ot′)

v. pros·e·cut·ed, pros·e·cut·ing, pros·e·cutes
v.tr.
1. Law
a. To initiate or conduct a criminal case against
b. To initiate or conduct (a civil case or legal action)
c. To initiate or conduct legal proceedings regarding (an offense, for example)

 

Show us ONE just ONE real, defined benefit for the British public from Brexit

Brexit Promised cake .... But just delivers a stream of Cack
... and expects us all to just swallow it
Brexit - Built from Bovine Manure by Bots
idonno
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 864
Thanks: 295
Fixes: 4
Registered: ‎22-10-2015

Re: BREXIT


@RobC wrote:

True

Drivel and childish comments removed

I was waiting for the detail from the court

Aren't we all but then you just have to read the official court proceedings to see how things were going to progress at the High Couirt, not some crowdfund advert.

Ever helpful. :grin: Sure, I’d love to help you out. Now which way did you come in?
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: BREXIT

From @idonno link to the proceeding, I think this paragraph sums it up.

This application is brought for political purposes. The position presented to the Court is that this is a disinterested attempt to improve the standards of political debate. The reality of this enterprise is different. The ‘Prosecutor’ (a limited company) is ‘Brexit Justice Limited’. Brexit Justice Limited is the product of a campaign to undermine the result of the Brexit referendum, and/or to prevent its consequences. The company and this application owe their existence to the desire on the part of individuals such as Mr Ball to undermine the referendum result. The 'Brexit justice' which is ultimately sought is no Brexit.

RobPN
Aspiring Hero
Posts: 2,881
Thanks: 1,128
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎17-05-2013

Re: BREXIT


@RobC wrote:

 

Its not me pre-judging or pre-empting court decisions - as anyone can see.

 

 

 


Guilty on two counts.

No not BJ, but @RobC  ...

... guilty of failing to accept the democratic result of the EU referendum, and now guilty of not accepting the courts decision on the failed private prosecution against BJ.  :rolleyes:

RobC
Pro
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 157
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎03-12-2016

Re: BREXIT


@Anonymous wrote:

From @idonno link to the proceeding, I think this paragraph sums it up.

This application is brought for political purposes.


 

 

 

Whatever you incorrectly think - The following actually sums it up:

 

First:

"57.  I do not accept the application is vexatious."

 

Followed by:

 

DECISION
"Having considered all the relevant factors I am satisfied that this is a proper case to issue the summons as requested for the three offences as drafted."

 

 

 

 

Show us ONE just ONE real, defined benefit for the British public from Brexit

Brexit Promised cake .... But just delivers a stream of Cack
... and expects us all to just swallow it
Brexit - Built from Bovine Manure by Bots
wotsup
Seasoned Champion
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 1,251
Registered: ‎21-11-2018

Re: BREXIT

Talk about lying in public .... surely spending crowdfunded money on yourself is a criminal offence.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7085721/Remainer-prosecuting-Boris-Johnson-spent-50-000-don...

Community Veteran
Posts: 6,641
Thanks: 1,418
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎23-09-2010

Re: BREXIT

If he was genuine about his crusade and really wanted to make a point surely he would have donated any excess to some good NHS cause.

Instead he has the same me me I'm right attitudes of an MP so of course he's spending it on himself.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: BREXIT


@RobC wrote:

Whatever you incorrectly think ...


That's your opinion @RobC and to be honest I don't really care, with the exception of this instance I don't care what you say or think.

RobC
Pro
Posts: 1,126
Thanks: 157
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎03-12-2016

Re: BREXIT


@Anonymous wrote:


That's your opinion @RobC and to be honest I don't really care


 

:rolleyes:

That wasn't my opinion. It was the quoted decision of the Magistrates court as documented in the link.

 

My opinion is that he should be tried, found guilty, thrown in jail and banned from public office.

- just as any policeman should be who interfered with evidence in a case.

 

Then work our way down the list a bit until a healthy fear of lying is deeply instilled into all our politicians.

 

... but we'll see what the high courts reasoning is when its released.

 

Show us ONE just ONE real, defined benefit for the British public from Brexit

Brexit Promised cake .... But just delivers a stream of Cack
... and expects us all to just swallow it
Brexit - Built from Bovine Manure by Bots
TTman
All Star
Posts: 610
Thanks: 386
Fixes: 1
Registered: ‎26-01-2019

Re: BREXIT

@RobC  Go down that route and I think you would find we have no MPs or Lords,No parliament. Only answer then would be to return to a Monarchy or would you prefer a dictatorship (Sorry forgot we already have the dictatership... The EU):crazy3: