cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

A lot of bull!

Highlighted
Pro
Posts: 572
Thanks: 161
Registered: ‎08-06-2011

A lot of bull!

From Caitlin Moran's Celebrity Watch  in The Times today:

8 DOWN Australian firemen
The headline in Newsweek ran “MASSIVE [-Censored-] EXPLOSION AFTER BLAZE HITS BULL ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION FACILITY, FIREFIGHTERS FORCED TO DODGE ‘PROJECTILES’”, which was bad news for the emergency services. But it was a detail in the story that haunts CW. For, with the local area now without bull [-Censored-] for the next season, the industry is asking itself what to do next. “This will mean a huge blow for farmers,” Arron Thomas, vice-chairman of the insemination facility, surmised. CW knows farmers are a can-do, hands-on bunch — but surely there’s a more scientific solution?

 

4 REPLIES 4
Highlighted
Community Veteran
Posts: 3,293
Thanks: 728
Fixes: 3
Registered: ‎04-08-2009

Re: A lot of bull!

@ffox 

Yerrsssss indeedy! Grin

Highlighted
Pro
Posts: 572
Thanks: 161
Registered: ‎08-06-2011

Re: A lot of bull!

I've just noticed:  that  [-Censored-]  word is acceptable in a respected newspaper but not here. Who'd have thought it!

Highlighted
Community Veteran
Posts: 6,926
Thanks: 1,516
Fixes: 2
Registered: ‎23-09-2010

Re: A lot of bull!


@ffox wrote:

This will mean a huge blow for farmers


I thought they used a specially made device.

Highlighted
Hero
Posts: 3,141
Thanks: 1,153
Fixes: 9
Registered: ‎05-09-2016

Re: A lot of bull!

Or call in Rebecca Loos, if she can do it for pigs, she can do it for bulls.

https://www.express.co.uk/videos/4115351285001/Rebecca-Loos-pleasures-a-pig-on-The-Farm