Minecraft
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Other forums
- :
- Gaming
- :
- Minecraft
Minecraft
20-08-2010 9:49 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I've been trying to play Minecraft with friends but have noticed it entirely fail to work at times, and at other times it works only tenuously and slowly.
I am on a legacy option 3 package and in the level 3 management phase.
I tried a simple telnet to the appropriate IP and port for a known working server (Other people connected and playing fine, hosted on a Linode VPS in London, no firewalls on my or it's end), and compared from my Plusnet connection and from another VPS:
james@daedalus:~/nebula$ telnet 109.74.205.221 25566
Trying 109.74.205.221... <timeout>
root@hometree:/etc/asterisk# telnet 109.74.205.221 25566
Trying 109.74.205.221...
Connected to 109.74.205.221.
(IP slightly mangled for security)
So; would Plusnet be blocking port 25566, and if so, why, given that gaming by their own traffic management policies should never be affected? I realize this is something of an exercise in futility since I know why (Minecraft evidently isn't in Ellacoya- it's worth noting that I'm using a nonstandard port, but most Minecraft servers _are_ on nonstandard ports) but I'd like to confirm that's what's happening and subsequently get it sorted out since this is most decidedly gaming and Plusnet appear to be entirely blocking it. So I'm a tad annoyed about that.
Edit: Oh, and if I tunnel through SSH to the box I can see the server from and play through that, it works fine except for being incredibly slow on account of SSH being throttled to the point where typing on remote boxes is horribly laggy. This tech was designed to work with low latency on acoustic couplers!
Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:04 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
AFAIK they don't block ports but you should ensure that the Plusnet firewall is turned off
Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
512kbps sounds a bit rich. I'm currently outperforming my home PC on my mobile phone on GPRS.
Edit (again!): "When the allowance is reached, peak-time file transfer applications such as peer-to-peer are blocked until your next billing date." So, could Minecraft be getting classified as P2P?
As for 512kbps, not sure how this tallies with that:

Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:26 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator

WRT classification you could try running Wireshark http://community.plus.net/library/faults/using-wireshark-for-data-capture/
Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:32 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
1 megabit per second is 102.4 kilobits per second. And in case you were getting confused with megabytes/second, 0.1MBps in kbps = 819.2 kbps. Unless I've totally forgotten everything I learned about computer networking and so on.... but I think I'm right on all counts there.
Wireshark shows 3 SYN packets, no ACKs at all. Not a lot of use in this case, since to get an idea of classification I'd have to receive some response from the server that has passed through the Plusnet network.
Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:37 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
kilo = 1,000
mega = 1,000,000
Re: Minecraft
20-08-2010 10:43 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
A few quick example calculators which I'm fairly certain yield correct results:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enGB343GB343&aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=0.1Mb/s+in+k...
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=0.1Mb/s+in+kbps
But do the maths: 0.1 * 1000000 = 100000. 100000 / 1000 = 100. Now, we're dealing with bits and bytes so there's some 1024s in there but my point stands. I am working towards Cisco CCNA certification and have some fairly considerable experience in network design and implementation, and used to work for an ISP. So... yeah. Please learn some basic maths and basics about computers.
dick:quote
Re: Minecraft
21-08-2010 9:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator



It was too late at night

I was only reading this
and not my original foul up
Quote from: JHarrison 1 megabit per second is 102.4 kilobits per second.
Re: Minecraft
31-01-2011 9:56 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I ran WinMtr for half an hour and got the following results:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 1 | 2158 | 2154 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| lo0-central1.ptn-ag01.plus.net - 7 | 2158 | 2027 | 23 | 28 | 337 | 25 |
| gi2-6-111.ptn-gw01.plus.net - 7 | 2158 | 2013 | 22 | 30 | 373 | 23 |
| po4.ptn-gw02.plus.net - 7 | 2158 | 2023 | 23 | 30 | 486 | 24 |
| po5.pte-gw02.plus.net - 7 | 2158 | 2022 | 22 | 28 | 264 | 23 |
|10ge.xe-0-0-0.linxb.ldn-teleh-dis-1.peer1.net - 6 | 2158 | 2047 | 22 | 26 | 399 | 23 |
| No response from host - 100 | 2158 | 0 | 600 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vl2.uk1-dist-rt1.peer1.net - 1 | 2158 | 2157 | 25 | 28 | 472 | 38 |
| 83.222.240.30 - 1 | 2158 | 2141 | 25 | 28 | 173 | 35 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR 0.9 (c) 2010-2011 Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
I love this game, but i can't play it on our rented server. Please can someone advise?
Thanks

Re: Minecraft
04-02-2011 9:59 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Minecraft
04-02-2011 10:14 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Minecraft
08-02-2011 9:43 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
has anyone sent in a ticket with a wireshark capture so that it can be added to the management switches?
Looking at starting playing this (bought it but havent got round to playing)

Regards
Re: Minecraft
09-02-2011 2:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Minecraft
13-02-2011 11:48 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Minecraft
13-02-2011 6:29 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Unfortunately wiresharks aren't a simple tech support issue, and you'll have to get the ticket put into the correct queue (networks)
Shouldnt take too long, signatures sometimes need collaboration with Arbor networks (which may take longer)
Regards
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page