| Quote from: MattyC |
G.INP isn't present on your line. It would tell you something different on the test results:
| Quote | | Profile Name 0.128M-60M Downstream, Retransmission High - 0.128M-20M Upstream, Retransmission Low |
The last bit is the teller.
|
Ahh but if the ECI modem has simply reverted into fall-back mode which it appears to have done,(interleaving on the upstream) the DSLAM may not report G.inp being active ,
I know for a fact that this appeared to have been the case when my circuit was G.inped at first, and for several weeks afterwards the GEA end to end test reported a similar interleaved profile to the op's so it can took quite some time to actually report a G.inp profile,
My advice to the op would be to buy a broadcom chipped modem, the BT OR Huawei HG612 version 3B S/H can be purchased from Ebay for under £30 which when flashed with unlocked FW that supports G.inp will provide stats , and once the Dslam sees a G.inp compatible device connected it will re apply G.inp and restore the sync and lower latency to fast path levels on most lines
As for the alternative of waiting for BT to roll out this fix what ever that may or may not be, this could be weeks before the OP's cab has this pushed to it , I know i wouldn't want to have to use a borked circuit for several weeks for some fix that we nothing about that may or may not be a satisfactory solution
