Plusnet rejects Plusnet ;)

[#1]

My spam filtering is set to '1 - least aggressive', but it kicked out Plusnet's latest marketing email.
Maybe it didn't like the word 'love' ?

[#2]

Don't suppose you've still got the email and can post the headers here with your email address obscured?

[#3]

Sorry, Bob, missed your reply - just found it now.
Headers as requested:
From - Tue Oct 06 08:07:56 2015
X-Account-Key: account6
X-UIDL: UID43505-1214892554
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:                                                                               
Return-path: <bounced@bt-plusnet.trclient.com>
Envelope-to: *****@********.plus.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:47:15 +0100
Received: from [212.159.8.109] (helo=avasin13.plus.net)
  by inmx17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ZjL5n-00076N-Mo
  for *****@********.plus.com; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:47:15 +0100
Received: from mx1.bt-plusnet.trclient.com ([202.43.5.89])
by avasin13.plus.net with Plusnet Cloudmark Gateway
id RhnB1r0051vEQBu01hnD8b; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:47:15 +0100
X-BV-Spam-Flag: Yes
X-IPAS: Level1
X-CM-Score: 100.00
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=DKhymH5b c=1 sm=1 tr=0 b=1 p=yypmuo5yAAAA:20
a=ICU+spCqCVEiGWLksExONw==:117 a=ICU+spCqCVEiGWLksExONw==:17 a=EdZU2yQAAAAA:8
a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=5lJygRwiOn0A:10 a=g9jHyxy1AAAA:8 a=JqEG_dyiAAAA:8
a=_Xa7HgrkAAAA:8 a=BD7kO0DlAAAA:8 a=Z12tooAyAAAA:8 a=Uz_YOowO-tQ_6TEsS9sA:9
a=gkq4zGARRNWL0On8:21 a=tf4viYN12Y9NrkQu:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
a=_oeb5UAI7GoA:10 a=pn7XOFuvdOUA:10 a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10
a=vnREMb7VAAAA:8 a=e9qsufxtAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=9XXu9Lr2oum7NXO0:21
a=dn09sIbKbcL0TAI_:21 a=7_sIg9w7ASllV04L:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10
a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=MZpOI37Du90A:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=tra; d=comm.plus.net;
h=From:Reply-to:Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=plusnet@comm.plus.net;
bh=cAV1DefoxbB8BMnYMJH0OqlLdTw=;
b=ogSDyjwgii/pBQaOI10n1lHTGbA4gf9yb1Qet25KjAcNJD+mrS88ZgzDRLNtFeJt+KUtVKmOLVCp
  HRzhAikpfXqimQaCkp/FmeWY1VdsxwHFxnGjkifJJQnxRZMy6A+wobZ7OVJTV4tGS1/cK50cHkOg
  1r3feUdOkbHeUnIdsmg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=tra; d=comm.plus.net;
b=aBJ81xIki5wCdn4M+A0bSCmXznQVxg3CLJuF6u5OX3xvS6krQHrY+86E7dhEdBgsdWFUIyUXR3xV
  lt2SxCIKMn7nJC1Tmwntf2KRjN2bgDE0DJMjVdtwPjoIbFvjY99W98JYf43bWgz66novT4vinDyb
  EgSHt0/XSZZ3nXk7MxE=;
Received: by mx1.bt-plusnet.trclient.com id h2dg6416pe0s for <*****@********.plus.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:08:21 +1100 (envelope-from <bounced@bt-plusnet.trclient.com>)
x-accountid: 5874
X-tra-envid: 1867858927-int
From: =?utf-8?B?UGx1c25ldA==?= <plusnet@comm.plus.net>
Reply-to: autoemail@plus.net
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:08:21 +1100
Message-Id: <1867858927.554501202@bt-plusnet.trclient.com>
To: *****@********.plus.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="UNIQUE_STRING"
X-pn-pstn: Spam 1
X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)
Subject: [-SPAM-] =?utf-8?B?UGx1c25ldC4gQnJpbmdpbmcgYmFjayB0aGUgbG92ZS4=?=
--UNIQUE_STRING
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charSet="UTF-8"

[#4]

Thanks.