cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

Luzern
Hero
Posts: 4,823
Thanks: 946
Fixes: 9
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

it was sent to each of us, not to and cc. Message source details are identical, as proved by their side by side comparison in spreadsheet.

Yet mine arrived in my Inbox hours after hers.

How does something like that happen?

No one has to agree with my opinion, but in the time I have left a miracle would be nice.
5 REPLIES 5
MJN
Pro
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 161
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎26-08-2010

Re: Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

When you say 'message source' do you mean that including the headers also? If so it's a client issue. What clients are you using? If the headers differ then that'll indicate where the relative hold up was, but won't necessarily explain why. 

Luzern
Hero
Posts: 4,823
Thanks: 946
Fixes: 9
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Re: Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

For clarity here it is, shortened and ammonised. Client is Thunderbird.

Moderator's note by Dick (Strat): Full quote of preceding post removed as per Forum rules.

No one has to agree with my opinion, but in the time I have left a miracle would be nice.
MJN
Pro
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 161
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎26-08-2010

Re: Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

Did you forget to attach/include?

Luzern
Hero
Posts: 4,823
Thanks: 946
Fixes: 9
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Re: Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

@MJN Ooops, yes.

Return-path: <sender@sender.plus.com>

Envelope-to: us@us.plus.com

Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:58:40 +0100

Received: from [212.159.14.23] (helo=avasin-peh-003.plus.net)

          by inmx01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1mXVyq-0000gW-I9

          for us@us.plus.com; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:58:40 +0100

Received: from avasout07.plus.net ([192.168.2.6])

        by Plusnet Cloudmark Gateway with ESMTP

        id XVyqmgVcFZt3hXVyqmTVmX; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:58:40 +0100

X-CM-Score: 0.00

X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=V5Eebcri c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=615b7910 cx=a_idp_d

 a=fTP+3eAQz1Npw2x2rIHg1Q==:117 a=pTM2XgjQXs3aNFruyk9DPg==:17

 a=8gfv0ekSlNoA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=aHsAou65kgvwdlI-LX8A:9

 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Attn4bls8rqQp5NdfyEA:9

 a=ZexITqwinzkcHuk3:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10

 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=xo5jKAKm-U-Zyk2_beg_:22

Received: from INSPIRONPC ([146.198.119.220])

        by smtp with ESMTPA

        id XVyjms2AadY2SXVyqmBiUi; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 22:58:40 +0100

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=plus.com; s=042019;

        t=1633384720; bh=8XwG1C/cDpVHj3zBoWDup6rLYjoZxEtJKxu4MQgLKIU=;

        h=From:To:Subject:Date;

        b=gmy6WUiSfoFNZjHpKnOgKF31d0g09XWu355jBI0JFOB6CFgMd/StNw8pMzXlnOnPH

         9C7vR4PBT9Vqz62AfkM0dDvdQVlsG/qOIWC5hZAhUQLYl+HB5i8MSf2Mm8yd2HgBhK

         eCVnaZNI1i0rVfxhya1jIO8x1C1PAZ/LnzN6020xSTzJ24g8b79yQL4SaqrH9mZTDA

         +wB8U0ACNWZRzhvqeL6iwHMle9+10lgQ/H32gX5KlLHqqYxN3Se/f+Z4BVqGOaNAG4

         sMwUc5uX8yAb7R2Ds9Au9i19YgoxeIoPRhfzI0l1gHiGuzL35sd/IWGq2tyVtpBkTb

         LeuB9qJw6NjvA==

X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett"

X-CM-Score: 0.00

X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=NP5OB3yg c=1 sm=1 tr=0

 a=pTM2XgjQXs3aNFruyk9DPg==:117 a=pTM2XgjQXs3aNFruyk9DPg==:17

 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=aHsAou65kgvwdlI-LX8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10

 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Attn4bls8rqQp5NdfyEA:9

 a=ZexITqwinzkcHuk3:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10

 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=xo5jKAKm-U-Zyk2_beg_:22

X-AUTH: sender@sender.plus.com:2500

From: <sender@sender.plus.com>

To: "Wife" <wife@usplus.com>,

        "'Myself" <us@us.plus.com>

Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 22:58:33 +0100

Message-ID: <028f01d7b96a$fbce1d20$f36a5760$@thestripeyroom.plus.com>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0290_01D7B973.5D94F620"

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0

Thread-Index: Ade5amMAODTQp1O+STmmrRuf/vTGjA==

Content-Language: en-gb

X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDHZUwqc2Rjlkc70OipEsDWZgRJtLsKimj5W0Jdc9QbSNniMpaCCaldTIRXkAsWrJjX3YlGQuXaRnodolnaOola81u0HWaxlU9QFFuKtTHZnpLCoEag/

 R0NgeTU/gINNS/FeScWC3ISnQVDmo1ToaSQDn4nXitVur4fO0QbcYOq/qnI29rBQ9AOk6iIlipZzflM3GHzCaoj+UNm87UTq8rw=

X-pn-pstn-db:" Spam 99

X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v5.00)

Subject: Hello

 

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

 

------=_NextPart_000_0290_01D7B973.5D94F620

Content-Type: text/plain;

        charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

Message text

------=_NextPart_000_0290_01D7B973.5D94F620

Content-Type: text/html;

 

 

No one has to agree with my opinion, but in the time I have left a miracle would be nice.
MJN
Pro
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 161
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎26-08-2010

Re: Identical email to wife and me from related Plusnetter arrive hours apart

Were the headers of each received email exact the same? If so, that suggests they were indeed delivered at the same time which indeed you would expect given the common destination domain (and the fact they never even left Plusnet's infrastructure). If they appeared to arrive at different times I'd suspect the layer client stalling in some way, not checking for mail when expected to etc.