Error 552 when sending emails
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- :
- Error 552 when sending emails
Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 4:58 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Hello
I am receiving a bounceback "552 Spam Message Rejected" error when I send an email which contains the domain name "theomnicollective.com" to a PLUSNET email address
Even if I send a simple email with no attachments and it just contains the single line "theomnicollective.com" and nothing else that is sufficient to trigger the bounceback error.
It doesn't happen sending to other email providers just when sending to PLUSNET
Unfortunately it is my daughters wedding caterers domain and she is pulling her hair out.
Help!
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 5:34 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I can confirm that this happens if this domain name is used as the email subject - following bounce back from @outlook.com sending to one of my PN mailboxes
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=AJD6s2lVUzCugujOR1/QqX/gqN0LrBCtRq4YCcJpkPU=;
b=ZBAPnI4Cw4j82Am6D7wRqkoRCVY00tx99ezFS2ZB4ot0GO+4MuT2jBD93NA4VQakw0aqWQqjEh7fUvDaUUKVXQx089DWB6dKezZXvrDOErC/dMeQmsxM2P9uG628yhI9VjYhxeiItCCvht7h8Iak3CYd2bI5O5MZ+xg8r9FMN5qgO/nLPgGinzJfz5WfoimLH+kyHGlNgJ0fJhvKv/9RrZdQ9GwjkaCypWzWE8ePIw2au/cF7JLM66kksyli2nRthcWPUMR//uadRS8TD44Xn3RQTzo8omgfhX+Zi7uBXMBNKBnZh/jaDNk6CsiwRGFm54e42kfJ3HZITi6ka1Y+AA==
Received: from HE1EUR01FT059.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.54) by HE1EUR01HT208.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.1.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.527.22; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:17:52 +0000
Received: from HE1PR02MB1372.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.0.52) by HE1EUR01FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.0.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.527.22 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:17:52 +0000
Received: from HE1PR02MB1372.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::78c7:1396:b23d:2baf]) by HE1PR02MB1372.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::78c7:1396:b23d:2baf%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0588.013; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:17:51 +0000
From: XXmeXX <XXmeXX@outlook.com>
To: "XXmeXX@mydomain.me.uk" <XXmeXX@mydomain.me.uk>
Subject: theomnicollective.com
Thread-Topic: theomnicollective.com
Thread-Index: AdO67zTxoGkq6qSWQB6V/89zJSOCEA==
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:17:51 +0000Message-ID: <HE1PR02MB1372D1D3E022021AD2331FC5EDD20@HE1PR02MB1372.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:2A5B1088E87E492127A1802515C8D38D5BA85FA819C021555081540E1CFC1E33;UpperCasedChecksum:CF269303BC54FE525753CA7654C862B1E2C3DECD0FB52447EC7E886172F00859;SizeAsReceived:6787;Count:43
x-tmn: [HE/H120+nBwzRkmDGH1bEvqiKIZ7gEml]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;HE1EUR01HT208;7:KRjRrbCfKF1vI52i/dzqOGTr/vfEOcnwAqHC5BaaiEvMAkfb0eZnEKTDiL08/qdfmL3z9RLC0j+TGGXBsmxRsoFtTvWlqpcGO/9wkWIqXkly62zE4V0ab8gRZ7FSMvRkAnNX5QgoxEwugY5l8pnl5gBhqvpJeef/OZLeDuLu2jlB4HiiGMpUZoxdmfJy13duJqd0U1JWvesaB/2JinQX2AYsD0OJt7LbPP3eO7V9bo2R6fVFt465N38jhn492m9E
x-incomingheadercount: 43
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam:
UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045);SRVR:HE1EUR01HT208;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1EUR01HT208:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2533dbee-f93f-4e2e-0dfa-08d589065a40
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test:
BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(444000031);SRVR:HE1EUR01HT208;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HE1EUR01HT208;
x-forefront-prvs: 0610D16BBE
x-forefront-antispam-report:
SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070007)(98901004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:HE1EUR01HT208;H:HE1PR02MB1372.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 9GK/fgkeQ12Z3/PDoLJ5e0Cn9X1z4CfMc9H4geHUqp9hRnxl5m0GC0zmu9z9KAJG98TZH9nFtOR7ZVuXGa7mFUqsbV2uB//NvRN/sF5JxwQ70VnRNOu7sYDboArhPJbNWFhp5FurIRBTHcKFSeD4gbVgiRiCIacqSonFC1MasJ2IowETAsQwhZIVaW1oZRi0
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR02MB1372D1D3E022021AD2331FC5EDD20HE1PR02MB1372eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2533dbee-f93f-4e2e-0dfa-08d589065a40
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Mar 2018 17:17:51.9437 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT208
@Kelly / @bobpullen - is there any insight as to why this and other domain names have been black-balled? There seems to be a spate of them of recent times.
Would white listing this domain in the PN email spam filter help any?
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 5:48 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
... answer to my own question - well in part ...
If these emails are coming from @theomnicollective.com the putting that domain name in the white sender's list will cause the spam filter to allow the email "in" see here - https://www.plus.net/my.html?action=myemail&s=1&redirected=yes > Manage My Mail > Spam > White list near the bottom.
However replying fails...
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: RE: theomnicollective.com
Sent: 13/03/18 17:42
The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:
'XXmeXX' on 13/03/18 17:42
552 vnwBePhVNIlWkvnwCeKxw3 message rejected due to spam or virus. If you believe this is in error please login to your portal or contact your ISP support team.
I guess that the bit in red is generic text, as it is of little help to Plusnet users.
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 5:55 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Thanks for investigating but unfortunately they aren't always coming (in fact most of the time) from that domain - sometimes they are forwarded by my daughters boyfriend (he happens to be using a gmail account but I've also tried using other email providers)
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 6:09 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
You can fix your daughter receiving those emails by putting the domain name or specific email address into the sender's white list - this will exclude ANYTHING sent by the whitelisted entity from SPAM filtering.
As I said, not a fix but something to help with part of the issue until a PN staffer picks this up.
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
13-03-2018 6:41 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Thank you for suggesting that temporary fix for emails sent directly from that domain
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
14-03-2018 12:35 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Is this still happening? Just checked the offending domain name and it's coming back clear.
Bob Pullen
Plusnet Product Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
14-03-2018 3:24 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I just ran the test I did yesterday and it is not being rejected. Is there any insight as to why we are seeing so many similar issues with innocuous domain names please?
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
14-03-2018 10:29 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Bob Pullen
Plusnet Product Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
14-03-2018 11:41 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I wonder if it is because the domain is with GoDaddy?
Re: Error 552 when sending emails
15-03-2018 1:26 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
That shouldn't be a problem. The initial block might have been association through their IP addresses with other domains sharing the server. Later refinement could have provided more focused blocking releasing this domain (and others) from the block.
Unfortunately spam control is not an exact science.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page