cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Blank emails

Community Veteran
Posts: 26,339
Thanks: 595
Fixes: 8
Registered: 10-04-2007

Blank emails

There seems to be a new email problem: Emails coming through with only a couple of lines of the headers and the body all blank. There's been reports on the PUG forums and thinkbroadband.

All the examples so far have come through pih-mxcore06.plus.net

If anyone gets one can they post the headers here to prove/disprove if it is a problem with that server.
jelv (a.k.a Spoon Whittler)
   Why I have left Plusnet (warning: long post!)   
Broadband: Andrews & Arnold Home::1 (FTTC 80/20)
Line rental: Pulse 8 Home Line Rental (£13/month)
Mobile: iD mobile (£4/month)
32 REPLIES
Community Veteran
Posts: 26,339
Thanks: 595
Fixes: 8
Registered: 10-04-2007

Blank emails

My headers:

I've had two - one was from the Plusnetters forums:
Envelope-to: plusnetters@xxx.yyy.com

Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:34:54 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwEta-0001Rk-3V
for plusnetters@xxx.yyy.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:34:54 +0000


The other I can't tell:
Envelope-to: john@xxx.yyy.com

Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:04:34 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwHEP-00013w-Li
for john@xxx.yyy.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:04:33 +0000
jelv (a.k.a Spoon Whittler)
   Why I have left Plusnet (warning: long post!)   
Broadband: Andrews & Arnold Home::1 (FTTC 80/20)
Line rental: Pulse 8 Home Line Rental (£13/month)
Mobile: iD mobile (£4/month)
Laugh
Grafter
Posts: 470
Registered: 07-08-2007

Blank emails

Here's mine:
Quote
Envelope-to: name@xxx.yyy.zzz
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:12:53 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwIIW-0000yl-0Q
for name@xxx.yyy.zzz; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:12:52 +0000
Liam
Grafter
Posts: 2,083
Registered: 04-04-2007

Blank emails

Strange one this. We could indeed do with some more examples.

Any others?
DavidHH
Grafter
Posts: 68
Registered: 03-08-2007

Blank emails

Here are two more:

Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:47:05 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwIpX-0001vA-Ee
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:47:01 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwIpV-0001r4-6d
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:46:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwIpQ-0001gr-Qc
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:46:54 +0000
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.4907
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.7051
Message-Id: <E1GwIpV-0001r4-6d@pih-mxcore12.plus.net>
From:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:46:57 +0000
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)

-------------------------

Envelope-to: david@hitchin.plus.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:12:02 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFTS-0000ch-Ir
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:59 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFTR-0000Zf-5D
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:57 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFTQ-0000Sw-Ap
for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:56 +0000
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.4899
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.7191
Message-Id: <E1GwFTR-0000Zf-5D@pih-mxcore06.plus.net>
From:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:57 +0000
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
Liam
Grafter
Posts: 2,083
Registered: 04-04-2007

Blank emails

This is being looked into now. More examples will be helpful.
Community Veteran
Posts: 14,469
Registered: 30-07-2007

Blank emails

From an AG post here (email address removed):

Quote
Envelope-to: xx.xx@xx.plus.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:12:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFTW-0000hO-Pw
for xx.xx@xx.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:12:02 +0000


and mine from this morning posted on PUG

Quote
Envelope-to: me@mydomain.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:11 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFSf-0007Yl-4E
for me@mydomain.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:11:09 +0000


And more posted on PUG

Quote
nvelope-to: xx@xxeure.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:29 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJMt-00057K-OW
for xx@xx.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:28 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJMl-00050B-Pg
for xx@xx.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:20 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJMj-0004wJ-MH
for xx.xx.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:17 +0000
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.4875
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.7599
Message-Id: <E1GwJMl-00050B-Pg@pih-mxcore12.plus.net>
From: XXX@XXX.net
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:21:20 +0000
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)


Quote
Envelope-to: ***.***.plus.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:45:38 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwHs9-0006aY-4w
for ***.@....plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:45:37 +0000


hitchin's email header does not look like the same thing though as it has a from.
DavidHH
Grafter
Posts: 68
Registered: 03-08-2007

Blank emails

Still not showing as a known problem on service status! Email reported as green for 16 hours and 10 minutes.

No news that anything has been done or is being done to fix it.

Can someone search through the waste bit-bucket to see if the rest of my emails are still there?
Community Veteran
Posts: 26,339
Thanks: 595
Fixes: 8
Registered: 10-04-2007

Blank emails

Interesting, mxcore06 is consistently giving very short headers and mxcore12 is giving the longer version.
jelv (a.k.a Spoon Whittler)
   Why I have left Plusnet (warning: long post!)   
Broadband: Andrews & Arnold Home::1 (FTTC 80/20)
Line rental: Pulse 8 Home Line Rental (£13/month)
Mobile: iD mobile (£4/month)
Community Veteran
Posts: 14,469
Registered: 30-07-2007

Blank emails

Except for Hitchin's 2nd example with long header on mxcore6 Wink
Andrew
Grafter
Posts: 72
Registered: 15-08-2007

Blank emails

More to be looking at

Quote
Envelope-to: yy@xxxco.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:48:30 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJmy-0000am-JD
for yy@xxx.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:48:24 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJmv-0000VZ-DP
for yy@xxxco.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:48:22 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwJmt-00006V-Sr
for yy@xxx.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:48:20 +0000
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.4989
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.5256
Message-Id: <E1GwJmv-0000VZ-DP@pih-mxcore12.plus.net>
From: Pictures@cameleoncandle.ch
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:48:21 +0000

Envelope-to: yy@xxx.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:02:33 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwK0c-0007nr-DF
for yy@xxx.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:02:30 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwK0a-0007kH-5r
for yy@xxx.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:02:28 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwK0W-0007Ty-KK
for yy@xxx.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:02:24 +0000
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5061
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.5634
Message-Id: <E1GwK0a-0007kH-5r@pih-mxcore12.plus.net>
From: aa@bbb.plus.com
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:02:28 +0000
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)



Both via 12, both simply contain the senders address without the alias. First one is probably Spam anyway, second one is from another +Net user. Is the content lost forever?

Also I got an email at 3am this morning that was sent at 11am on Friday, 64 hours - is this a record?

I'll PM the actual headers to you if you want.
Liam
Grafter
Posts: 2,083
Registered: 04-04-2007

Blank emails

This is being worked on. MXCore's 6 and 12 should no longer be accepting mail.
Andrew
Grafter
Posts: 72
Registered: 15-08-2007

Blank emails

Erm, MXCore6 no longer processing emails? Just sent myself a test message to check it got through at all and guess what?

Quote

Envelope-to: aa@bbb.co.uk
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:56 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwLaa-0007aX-8F
for aa@bbb.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:44 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwLaU-0007Pf-Fq
for aa@bbb.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwLaL-0007E2-KN
for aa@bbb.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:30 +0000
Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net ([212.159.14.214])by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwLaD-0006rX-BV for aa@bbb.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:23 +0000
Received: from [80.229.147.147] (helo=oemcomputer)by ptb-relay03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1GwLa4-0003gk-Ktfor aa@bbb.co.uk; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:14 +0000
From: "Andrew Tetley" <aa@bbb.co.uk>
To: "Andrew Tetley" <aa@bbb.co.uk>
Subject: Any better?
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:43:28 -0000
Message-ID: <MABBLIBLJBOKPFEGLDKPAENCCPAA.aa@bbb.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D5_01C722C3.A53FD6E0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
Importance: Normal
X-PN-VirusFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9893
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)


- and it was complete
N/A

blank e-mails

had 6 blank emails

Envelope-to: BONNIE@MARKD1.PLUS.COM
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:57:45 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwH7o-0006Th-9S
for BONNIE@MARKD1.PLUS.COM; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:57:44 +0000
X-NAS-BWL: No match found for '' (222 addresses, 0 domains)
X-NAS-Language: Unknown
X-NAS-Bayes: #0: 0.80187; #1: 0.19813
X-NAS-Classification: 0
X-NAS-MessageID: 5987
X-NAS-Validation: {FC0D2BEC-A488-4503-A1F6-50179C2A7F60}

Envelope-to: BONNIE@MARKD1.PLUS.COM
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:49:35 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwHvs-0007yW-UX
for BONNIE@MARKD1.PLUS.COM; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:49:33 +0000
X-NAS-BWL: No match found for '' (222 addresses, 0 domains)
X-NAS-Language: Unknown
X-NAS-Bayes: #0: 0.801949; #1: 0.198051
X-NAS-Classification: 0
X-NAS-MessageID: 6002
X-NAS-Validation: {FC0D2BEC-A488-4503-A1F6-50179C2A7F60}
Community Veteran
Posts: 1,160
Thanks: 1
Registered: 01-08-2007

Blank emails

Here are a couple I got earlier - no subject line and nothing in the body of the email, just this when I expanded the headers:

From: jennifermontfort.com@jacobsfam.com
Date: 18 December 2006 10:29:48 GMT
Envelope-To: xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com
Delivery-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:29:51 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFkj-0005sS-Mv for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:29:50 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFki-0005p8-AF for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:29:48 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwFkf-0005az-TG for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:29:46 +0000
X-Pn-Dspam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-Dspam-Result: Innocent
X-Dspam-Confidence: 0.5034
X-Dspam-Probability: 0.6282
Message-Id: <E1GwFki-0005p8-AF@pih-mxcore06.plus.net>
X-Pn-Spamfiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)


From: zmdttxmofs@brucebartoo.com
Date: 18 December 2006 07:04:23 GMT
Envelope-To: sybilchick@sybilandbarry.plus.com
Delivery-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:04:26 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwCXw-000625-W3 for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:04:25 +0000
Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with dspam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwCXu-0005yp-Ny for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:04:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1GwCXt-0005vJ-OO for xxxx@sybilandbarry.plus.com; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:04:21 +0000
X-Pn-Dspam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-Dspam-Result: Innocent
X-Dspam-Confidence: 0.4806
X-Dspam-Probability: 0.7103
Message-Id: <E1GwCXu-0005yp-Ny@pih-mxcore12.plus.net>
X-Pn-Spamfiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)


As they're pretty obviously spam, I'm not too bothered but would have been if I recognised the 'from' address.
Plusnet user since November 2003
Currently on Unlimited Fibre Extra and Unlimited UK & Mobile Calls