cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Bayesian Drivel

DavidHH
Grafter
Posts: 68
Registered: 03-08-2007

Bayesian Drivel

How long, O Lord, How long, do we have to endure the Bayesian drivel at the top of every message?

Is there a way of turning this off, short of applying a large hammer to the equipment which inserts all of this rubbish into the messages.
8 REPLIES
James
Grafter
Posts: 21,036
Registered: 04-04-2007

Bayesian Drivel

Very very confused.
N/A

Bayesian Drivel

I'm a bit confused too - perhaps an example of the sort of thing you are asking about might be helpful?
DavidHH
Grafter
Posts: 68
Registered: 03-08-2007

Bayesian Drivel

Just after the usual header I get something like the quoted below.

While I can set my email reader to show me full headers or only summaries, the report on the Bayesian evaluation of the message always appears.


X-PN-VirusFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Dec 14 08:53:24 2006
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.5873
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 143 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27,
jugs, 0.99000,
Received*([212.159.7.113]), 0.99000,
Message-ID*<380, 0.01000,
To*talk21.com, 0.01000,
X-URL*//mail2web.com/, 0.01000,
Received*mxlast01.plus.net+([212.159.7.113]), 0.99000,
X-URL*http+//mail2web.com/, 0.01000,
Received*14+Dec, 0.01000,
Received*14+Dec, 0.01000,
about+15, 0.01000,
carrot63
Grafter
Posts: 599
Registered: 12-07-2007

Bayesian Drivel

I think he might mean:

Quote
X-PN-DSpam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Dec 14 09:49:59 2006
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9907
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 10620 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27,
Received*invoked+by, 0.00094,
Received*uid, 0.00094,
Received*by+uid, 0.00094,
From*support, 0.00347,
'>, 0.01000,
Received*09+46, 0.01000,
Date*14+Dec, 0.01000,
KingdomTel, 0.01000,
X-Mailer*PHP, 0.01000,
us+<a, 0.01000,
Received*46+12, 0.01000,
Received*14+Dec, 0.01000,
Received*14+Dec, 0.01000,
link+please, 0.01000,
Url*shopping, 0.01000,
Url*shopping, 0.01000,
new+password, 0.01000,
for+<a, 0.01000,
Received*Thu+14, 0.01000,
Received*Thu+14, 0.01000,
8701, 0.01000,
password+ , 0.01000,
Received*(qmail, 0.01293,
Received*invoked, 0.01293,
Received*Thu, 0.01818,
Received*Thu, 0.01818,
please+copy, 0.02453
X-PN-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet MXCore (v3.00)


this bayesian drivel. And it is annoying me too.
Community Gaffer
Community Gaffer
Posts: 12,804
Thanks: 635
Fixes: 62
Registered: 04-04-2007

Bayesian Drivel

What client are you using?

If I set Thunderbird to only show partial headers the X-DSPAM headers aren't shown :?

Rgds,

Bob Pullen
Plusnet Products Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵

Liam
Grafter
Posts: 2,083
Registered: 04-04-2007

Bayesian Drivel

Likewise, I'm using Outlook and I see no headers unless I want to.
carrot63
Grafter
Posts: 599
Registered: 12-07-2007

Bayesian Drivel

In my case Eudora. I see tow or three lines of this from mail through my web host, but I've never seen anywhere near so many lines. This has only started in the last week or so.
DavidHH
Grafter
Posts: 68
Registered: 03-08-2007

Bayesian Drivel

Yes, I use Eudora, and there is a choice of abbreviated headers and full headers. Alas, even when I choose the option not to see full headers, the Bayesian report appears.