cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

DS doesn't look so bad, but the US is not at all good in comparison.
Pettitto
Plusnet Alumni (retired)
Plusnet Alumni (retired)
Posts: 6,346
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎26-11-2011

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

We'll get the D-side looked at.
hadden
Grafter
Posts: 486
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎27-07-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

Thanks Chris.
If there are any frozen manholes this time, I'll make sure they get well salted.
Pettitto
Plusnet Alumni (retired)
Plusnet Alumni (retired)
Posts: 6,346
Fixes: 5
Registered: ‎26-11-2011

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

No problem John.
Yes, no need for a blowtorch Smiley
hadden
Grafter
Posts: 486
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎27-07-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

A BT Openreach person visited on 15/02/13 (after another no show on 09/02/13).
From the initial conversation I had with the Openreach person, and the amount that I've learned during the life of this issue, I'm not sure the extent of technical understanding of the Openreach person was better than mine, except that he had been trained to use his automated test instrument.
For example, when I showed him the SNRM graphs that indicated how my noise margin dropped during the day, his interpretation was that was a good thing, as "an increased noise margin would indicate a problem".  Huh
His test instrument advised him that the battery voltage was a little high on one wire, which was a what the last boost engineer had noticed as well. He said this could be because 2 wires were touching at some point. So he left to look at the cabinet and carry out a test there.
His instruction from Plusnet was quite clear about he was only to consider the d-side and not change the e-side at all.
When he returned, he said nothing about the battery voltage, but that he had spoken with Chris at Plusnet and BT Wholesale at the exchange.
He advised that upstream interleaving had been turned on by BT wholesale. He was was also told by the exchange that they could see my connection had been dropping at 1am every day. However my data only showed that the SNRM dropped about 0.5dB at 11am everyday. It may be that the BT wholesale person misread a record and said 1am instead of 11am. However, I wonder what kind of data history is actually available within BT wholesale, and if it would be any use. Accorinf to my router interleaving had been on for the last 5 weeks, however, I noticed that the target upstream SNRM had now been increased from 6dB to 9dB.
He had opened two small junction boxes in the pavement and one larger manhole. The records showed that the larger manhole had not been opened since 2003. He found a joint in there with green corrosion, so re remade the joint and returned.
The Openreach person returned just before 11am, so I was going to have an opportunity to observe any effect on the above 11am noise margin drop that I had been experiencing. At that point my downstream sync speed was 5728kbps and SNRM 6.1dB.
When 11am came, there was no SNRM drop as had been clear over the previous weeks. In fact the SNRM showed a gradual increase.
The Openreach person said this was a Special Fault Investigation not a boost visit and not a boost visit, which explained why he appeared to be distracted form considering the technical aspects of the job.
So, he carried out his closedown checks and left for his next job. Unfortunately the close down checks required my line to be disconnected again and it reconnected at 5337 kbps.
My SNRM continued to gently rise until early afternoon where it sat around 6.4-6.6dB and then gradually decreased towards evening, which seemed better.
So, I planned to do a disconnect/reconnect around mid-day today and see if I got as higher sync speed.
However this morning at 11am , the SNRM drop recurred, so things may still be vulnerable to whatever interference causes that drop.
I went ahead with the reconnect at about 12:25pm and found my speed stayed around the same 5359kbps (ADSL2+). So I resynced, forcing the connection with ADSL2 and it connected at 5287kbps. So I then resynced forcing the connection with ADSL1 and it connected at 5632kbps.
I waited a short time and the errors did not climb as per the last time I tried switching to ADSL1.
These are the current router stats 4h 6m after connection.
DOWNSTREAM (Rx)
Noise Margin:    6.2  dB
Connection Rate:  5632  Kbps
Line Attenuation: 48.0  dB
Power:            19.6  dBm
Max Rate:        5920  Kbps

SuperFrames:      868421
SF (CRC) Errors:  122
Reed Solomon:    59052628
RS Corrected:    46318
RS Un-Corrected:  1292
HEC:              96
Errored Seconds:  83
Severe ES:        0
Interleave Depth: 32
Bitswaps:        2143

UPSTREAM (Tx)
Noise Margin:    7.0  dB
Connection Rate:  864  Kbps
Line Attenuation: 27.5  dB
Power:            12.3  dBm
Max Rate:        1056  Kbps

SuperFrames:      868419
SF (CRC) Errors:  16
Reed Solomon:    7380558
RS Corrected:    164
RS Un-Corrected:  0
HEC:              6
Errored Seconds:  0
Severe ES:        0
Interleave Depth: 4
Bitswaps:        245
TOTALS
Total Uptimes (From SF counts):
WAN:  0 days, 04:06:03

Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

Hi John,
Well that's just typical isn't it. How many engineers did you have (before everything got frozen) where someone could have looked down that manhole that hadn't been touched for 10 years. Whether it's a case of the battery voltage being due to a battery contact fault or just a good set of batteries at the exchange and a good e-side, who knows. So whether this interference that appears at 1100 is just so great a decent line will pick it up, or whether there is a residual fault is difficult to say. It's really a case of see how it goes for a few days. The current US errors seem better than previously at this moment but the DS seems about the same, maybe slightly higher at this instant, but really too early to tell.
hadden
Grafter
Posts: 486
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎27-07-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

Those previous stats on 16/02/13 were with my connection forced to ADSL1 which, although the stats show more errors, gives a better sync speed .
Allowing for the SNRM drop at 11am, I was hoping for over 5700kbps sync speed if I disconnected/reconnected before the SNRM drop the next day. In anticipation. That would mean a profile of 5000 kbps was possible, so Chris at Plusnet upped my profile to 5000 in anticipation.
I repeated the reconnection at 10:18 on 17/02/13. The connection automatically connected on ADSL2 with a downstream sync speed 5377kbps. So I disabled the ADSL2 option in my modem and reconnected again. This time it connected on ADSL2+ with a downstream sync speed = 5475kbps. I then disabled the ADLS2+ option and reconnected again at 5728kbps. So I left it at ADSL1 again.
These were the router stats at 10:18 today, 24 hours after the last reconnect.
DOWNSTREAM (Rx)
Noise Margin:    6.2  dB
Connection Rate:  5728  Kbps
Line Attenuation: 48.0  dB
Power:            19.6  dBm
Max Rate:        6016  Kbps

SuperFrames:      5084384
SF (CRC) Errors:  1025
Reed Solomon:    345738112
RS Corrected:    229770
RS Un-Corrected:  10132
HEC:              834
Errored Seconds:  599
Severe ES:        1
Interleave Depth: 32
Bitswaps:        11321

UPSTREAM (Tx)
Noise Margin:    7.0  dB
Connection Rate:  864  Kbps
Line Attenuation: 27.5  dB
Power:            12.5  dBm
Max Rate:        1036  Kbps

SuperFrames:      5084420
SF (CRC) Errors:  28
Reed Solomon:    43216567
RS Corrected:    1838
RS Un-Corrected:  0
HEC:              20
Errored Seconds:  0
Severe ES:        0
Interleave Depth: 4
Bitswaps:        260
TOTALS
Total Uptimes (From SF counts):
WAN:  1 days, 00:00:34

I ran several BT Wholesale speed tests over the last 24 hours and got download speeds between 4710 and 4800 kbps.
When I ran the first stage of the BT Wholesale speed test about 3 minutes after the reconnect, it only gave a result of around 4.4Mbps, which would be reasonable for a profile based upon the speed before the reconnect. So I immediately ran the Further Diagnostics option and that gave a speed result 4.71Mbps and said my profile was 5.05Mbps. It was as though the Further Diagnostics option itself triggered a profile update at the BT end. It would be great if the Plusnet profiling could be as immediate, and fortunate that Chris kindly upped my PN profile to be ready beforehand.
The fluctuations of SNRM when on ADSL1 seem to be less than with recent ADSL2 graphs, as per the attached graph.
As long as the DLM is happy with the error levels on ADSL1, I am happy to stick with it, for the extra bit of speed over using ADSL2/ADSL2+.
The 11am SNRM drop happened at 11:36 yesterday. This ties in with the likely source, which is a restaurant that opens at 12:00 each day, but opens at 12:30 on a Sunday.
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: Why is a "degraded" line not a faulty line?

This is definitely a case of see how it goes and maybe a bit of trial and error to reduce the errors - I'll try and omit any further puns  Wink
First observation is that the US errors are very much better, but I was somewhat surprised at the US upload speed, ought to be nearer 0.7Mbps.
Try running the BTw speedtest at varying times. You can run the Diagnostics every 10 minutes upto 3 times an hour, but the first stage can be run as often as you want.
The DS errors aren't too bad, but difficult to say how much of an improvement there may be or whether ADSL2 or 2+ may be better. I'd stick with this a while and see how it goes.
The Bits/Tone allocations are somewhat better at the Low Frequency end both in the US and DS and that chunk 212-238ish as well.
In case I haven't mentioned it before, missing tones 133, 147 &  152 are quite common on 21CN for ADSL1 or ADSL2. Different tones are missing for ADSL2+ .
I suspect there might be a bit of a trade-off between the CRC count (and the others) actual throughput speeds, sync speed and mode as well as day/night SNRM swing.
The 1100 ish SNRM drop definitely  seems like something being switched on. It's difficult to see when it's being turned off, it looks as though it could be around 2230 on your most recent graph. See if you can spot anything similar on the SNRM plots for other days.