Fast Forward going nowhere!
As I said previously (and others too) ZoneAlarm is just being over cautious - there is no risk with the mapiprop component itself.
Quote from: Pancho Zone Alarm Pro has now declared that there is 'Power Spy', which is Medium Risk, in mapiprop.dll.
Of course, that's up to you, but there is no actual danger in using it and if you are having problems then as myself and ChrisL (thanks :)) have said, please read ALL the documentation and then contact me with the details of the issues via my website or the RouterTech.Org forum
Quote from: Pancho the best I can do is forget about it and remove the program.
BTW, Bob Pullen has kindly supplied the new target addresses so I have updated FFW accordingly
Quote from: Neo BTW, Bob Pullen has kindly supplied the new target addresses so I have updated FFW accordingly
Good news! And quick work, guys
Neo: Have you changed it it forward the original message as an attachment instead of in-line?
No, I wasn't aware that was necessary :-\, however, reading http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,59439.0.html I see that it is. I wonder why it has changed 
I have sent an email to Bob to ask him if he could explain the exact requirements in a little more detail
I have sent an email to Bob to ask him if he could explain the exact requirements in a little more detail
Thanks Bob
I realise now that essentially you are planning to just forwarding spam emails to the Postini system (rather than process them yourselves). It's possible that if the spam received by PlusNet customers is fairly unique (which it could be considering the breach a while back) that the detection system might not be very effective since the emails from PlusNet would only make up a small fraction of those in the Postini database. Of course, the advantage is that overall the Postini system should be better equipped for a bigger spread of spam types.
What about the 'ham' (false positives)? Where are you sending that? I thought Postini only deal with missed spam?
I realise now that essentially you are planning to just forwarding spam emails to the Postini system (rather than process them yourselves). It's possible that if the spam received by PlusNet customers is fairly unique (which it could be considering the breach a while back) that the detection system might not be very effective since the emails from PlusNet would only make up a small fraction of those in the Postini database. Of course, the advantage is that overall the Postini system should be better equipped for a bigger spread of spam types.
What about the 'ham' (false positives)? Where are you sending that? I thought Postini only deal with missed spam?
Quote from: thehatman I've put the new ISP file in FFW and I will forward any HAM and SPAM inline using FastForward.
That's the best I can do. Will that work.
No - Postini requires them as attachments not inline.
Version 1.2.2 now supports sending as attachments
Hopefully Postini will continue to reduce the amount of incoming spam, but I think it's still easier/quicker to use FastForward to pass on emails than manually attaching them. Also, it provides several other features and I was thinking of adding some Postini header analysis etc...if people are interested
Hopefully Postini will continue to reduce the amount of incoming spam, but I think it's still easier/quicker to use FastForward to pass on emails than manually attaching them. Also, it provides several other features and I was thinking of adding some Postini header analysis etc...if people are interested
Quote from: Neo Version 1.2.2 now supports sending as attachments
Fantastic news Neo!
Thanks for the quick turnaround on this one, it's appreciated