DSL stats graphs microanalysis
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Broadband
- :
- DSL stats graphs microanalysis
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
11-11-2014 9:09 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: Anotherone As I'm sure you appreciate ADSL2/2+ has no direct bearing on the upstream, the resync is more likely to have resulted in what you've seen.
If you were not referring to ADSL2/2+, then what other less likely causes were you referring to then? What was the resync more likely than?
It's going to be a pretty pointless debate if you turn around and say you didn't mean what you last said in every other post.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
12-11-2014 6:32 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
The bit loading graphs from the 582n on ADSL2+ vs ADSL2 have the same different shapes as graphs from my netgear, with reduced bit loading on each end of the upstream band and the lowest end of the downstream band.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
12-11-2014 6:58 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
12-11-2014 8:19 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Personally I really don't see there's any point in stating you'll reply more later, I expect we've all got other things to do.
This thread wasn't really soliciting any input from anyone. Although there do happen to be more than one other thread with people on very long ADSL lines on ADSL2+. I don't think there's any benefit whatsoever from them continuing to operate on ADSL2+.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
12-11-2014 8:34 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: ejs It's going to be a pretty pointless debate if you turn around and say you didn't mean what you last said in every other post.
You have implied something that you think I'm going to do - so you are a mind reader
If I'm going to change my mind about something I've said, I'll clearly say so and where I disagree with you, I'll clearly say so.
In the meantime, whilst I am here, there are other things deserving my attention. I'll get back to you in due course - your continued sniping will not help matters.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
14-03-2015 9:34 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
01-04-2015 6:42 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
20-06-2015 11:47 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
On 18th June I decided to add a bit more stability in an attempt to eventually get the 3db profile back. After 2 days, I see this morning that the DLM decided to switch interleaving off. In my case, I got more bandwidth with interleaving on, presumably the coding gain from the FEC resulted in more bandwidth than was used up to carry the FEC data. I was not really aiming for the ping time to go from 20ms to 11ms, since the 20ms ping time with interleaving on didn't seem too bad anyway.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
17-11-2015 8:47 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Old style LJU master socket and one extension socket, star wired including a section of non twisted-pair cable.
Daily graph for Monday 26 October - After
NTE5A master socket plus SSFP, extension socket with section of non twisted-pair cable now filtered off at SSFP. ADSL lead also replaced with a bit of CAT5 cable with RJ11 plug on one end.
So quite a few changes, which resulted in ... almost no difference whatsoever.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
10-12-2015 5:05 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
10-12-2015 6:04 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: ejs ...........what if anything happened next.
Your line went dead?
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
10-12-2015 8:39 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
10-12-2015 4:48 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Yesterday the DLM decided to reduce the downstream target SNRM to 3, probably due to that high upstream SNRM over the last 4 days, which only appeared to be due to the low upstream speed.
This resulted in me having to enable the +2 dB SNRM tweak, but still, I suppose the net result is a very slight increase in bandwidth.
Re: DSL stats graphs microanalysis
11-12-2015 5:48 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Broadband
- :
- DSL stats graphs microanalysis