cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

10 adsl disconnections required

Chris
Legend
Posts: 17,724
Thanks: 600
Fixes: 169
Registered: ‎05-04-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Here's the connection:

The majority of the disconnections we see on there are showing as 'user request' which is normally what we see when the router is disconnected rather than a sync drop.

Sorry if I've missed it, but is the connection wired or wireless?
Former Plusnet Staff member. Posts after 31st Jan 2020 are not on behalf of Plusnet.
scotland731
Dabbler
Posts: 23
Registered: ‎13-05-2014

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Here are the BT test results, they are attached both before and after a full restart.
Chris, the connection is a combination of wired and wireless devices.
For the test I have only my pc and the router connected.
Wireless was turned off and my network disconnected.
Router setup to assign dhcp.
The only connections which were dropped by request or electric issues aka meter running out were Sunday night when I got the remote server is not responding report from the router, I switched to the test socket at this point.
Tuesday morning - meter.
Wednesday when I was resetting thins to test.
There was an instance last night where we had no internet and this was a remote server is not responding report from the router.
I have also attached the radius plot to highlight this also.
scotland731
Dabbler
Posts: 23
Registered: ‎13-05-2014

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Here is the latest radius plot.
Oldjim
Resting Legend
Posts: 38,460
Thanks: 787
Fixes: 63
Registered: ‎15-06-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

My first thought is that something is hammering the connection 24/7
Is this correct
Did something change at 5.00pm other than a resync perhaps
picbits
Rising Star
Posts: 3,432
Thanks: 23
Registered: ‎18-01-2013

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

That looks like a connection with lots of P2P connections or similar. I know some routers fall over when they get too many incoming connections then require a reboot.
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Hi scotland731, so you don't get yourself confused - or the rest of us Wink  what you posted in reply #17 is not a Radius Plot/Log, that's the TBB BQM (ThinkBroadBand Quality Monitor). What Chris posted in reply #15 is a "Visual" Radius log (VR for short).
Quote from: Townman
........... though there are known (suspected) cases of micro-synch loss without PPP session loss being seen.

Whilst we are on the subject of terminology, I'm sorry to have to be critical here but Townman, will you please stop using this "invented terminology" of yours, it means nothing to the great majority except there are possibly about 3 people on this forum that might know what you mean from a previous discussion we had. There is no such thing as "micro-sync loss".
Why don't you say in plain english, if there is an initial loss of Upstream sync which may then result in a loss of downstream sync, then this frequently does not result in a loss of PPP session and hence no gateway change or IP address change (if not on a fixed IP address).
scotland731, as has been commented by 2 or 3 posters your connection looks like it's being very heavily used from the information gleaned from the BQM, the very low BT speedtest might be consistent with that if it weren't for the fact that you said that the wireless was off and the rest of your network disconnected. Whilst we will bear the possibility of congestion in mind, I think there needs to be some more fundamental questions and potential issues dealt with first.
We'll just mention this first,
Quote from: scotland731
Are the forum members aware of this policy?
Would the forum members be happy if they had this response?

This isn't a "policy" as such, but as has been explained, it can be very difficult if connection loss is infrequent to convince BT Wholesale that there's a fault which should be investigated. I am however disappointed that the CSC response didn't appear to be more helpful in trying to get to the bottom of the issue, it could have been a simple misunderstanding, but I suspect that the right questions were not asked, and maybe CRT can have a look at the relevant ticket(s) and listen to any relevant phone call so some "feedback" can be addressed. It's clearly not acceptable to have losses of connection in the middle of gaming.
OK, down to a bit of nitty-gritty.
It's obvious that there is some sync loss occurring on occasion, but it's establishing the cause(s) that's important. Ignoring power outage, from the last DSL stats that you posted the CRC error count for that Uptime is enormous! IF the error rate that figure gives is on average is typical, it's no wonder sync is lost on occasion, but also from the stats the Upstream sync is banded, and the Downstream Target SNRM has been raised by the exchange DLM (Dynamic Line Management). Now, it also perfectly possible that that was one or two large bursts of noise/interference that caused those errors. For instance, the other night we a brief thunder and lightning storm which wouldn't have done much good for my error count - did you have anything like that since Wednesday 1300 for example? However, that doesn't account for the US banding or DS Target SNRM showing on the previous stats. Also Interleaving is on, increased latency - not good for quite a lot of gaming.
You mentioned about moving to the test socket, so let's start with basics.
Obviously you have a Master Socket similar to the one on the left. Can you describe any extension phone sockets, and what is normally plugged in where, what type of phone etc?
Do all your Microfilters look similar to this?
Can you hear/have you heard any crackling or other noises on the line when using the phone? Have you had any problems with incoming or outgoing calls? If need be, do the Quiet Line Test 17070 option 2.
Do you reboot the modem/router and under what circumstances do you do that/
Whilst you mentioned only your PC was on when you ran the BTw Speedtest, is it possible there was some other traffic from any automated updates or P2P software?
Lastly, What AV software are you using? Can I suggest that you also run a full in depth AV check, to make sure that the heavy usage that seems to be apparent from the BQM which also appears to be almost 24/7, isn't down to a virus etc.
scotland731
Dabbler
Posts: 23
Registered: ‎13-05-2014

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Firstly, thanks for taking the time guys to help me with my issue.
My lack of what was meant by radius log is down to not having had an issue or any need to use the forum for years lol.
To try and answer a couple of questions, yes I do have a p2p service which runs on my NAS, at the time of running the BT test this was removed as only my pc was connected straight to the router.
I have had a couple of SNR resets prior to the BT engineer visits and interleaving was turned on some time ago due to dropping connections.
My previous router would become unresponsive during any connection issue, so I replaced this prior to pursuing a more stable connection.
I have a new NTE5 socket, I have the filter plugged in and a 3 meter adsl telephone cable plugged in
I have a Siemens Gigaset N300 plugged in for the phones.
I am using a new microfilter the same as in the picture.
I have done the silent test previously but haven't done after the BT engineer visit.
I'm not aware of any weather conditions which may have caused the huge number of crc errors, I'm in Scotland so that may answer that question lol.
As a rule I only periodically restart the router, firmware updates or any settings which may benefit from a restart, however I have always made the person I am speaking to aware of these.
I actually work in IT and I know you can't always trust what the software is telling you.
I have just looked at my router logs, again I have crc errors  
DSL Uptime
0 days 5 hours 8 minutes 37 seconds
DSL modulation
ITU G.992.5(ADSL2PLUS)
Annex mode
ANNEX_A
SNR Down
9.3 dB
SNR Up
6.6 dB
Line Attenuation Down
36.4 dB
Line Attenuation Up
21.1 dB
Path Mode
Interleaved
Data Rate Down
10290 kbps
Data Rate Up
888 kbps
MAX Rate Down
11948
MAX Rate Up
888
POWER Down
0.0 dbm
POWER Up
12.3 dbm
CRC Down
76
CRC Up
0
If the log indicates the router is at fault then I'll happily swap and put my previous router back on.
I have removed my IP address and domain infromation from the log below but this may help, please bear in mind I restarted my router after the initial test.
Jan  1 00:05:10 dnsmasq-dhcp[801]: Ignoring domain  for DHCP host name
Jan  1 00:05:17 pppd[1250]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jan  1 00:05:18 pppd[1250]: Connected to 00:30:88:00:00:05 via interface vlan100
Jan  1 00:05:18 pppd[1250]: Connect: ppp0 <--> vlan100
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: peer from calling number 00:30:88:00:00:05 authorized
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: local  IP address
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: remote IP address
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: primary   DNS address 212.159.6.9
Jan  1 00:05:19 pppd[1250]: secondary DNS address 212.159.6.10
Jan  1 00:05:19 start_nat_rules: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Jan  1 00:05:20 kernel: xt_connbytes: Forcing CT accounting to be enabled
Jan  1 00:05:20 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jan  1 00:05:20 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10060 is big. Consider r2q change.
Jan  1 00:05:21 rc_service: ip-up 1292:notify_rc stop_upnp
Jan  1 00:05:21 rc_service: ip-up 1292:notify_rc start_upnp
Jan  1 00:05:21 rc_service: waitting "stop_upnp" via ip-up ...
Jan  1 00:05:21 miniupnpd[843]: received signal 15, good-bye
Jan  1 00:05:22 miniupnpd[1357]: HTTP listening on port 51176
Jan  1 00:05:22 miniupnpd[1357]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Jan  1 00:05:22 ddns update: ez-ipupdate: starting...
Jan  1 00:05:22 ddns update: connected to ns1.asuscomm.com (103.10.4.108) on port 80.
Jan  1 00:05:22 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
Jan  1 00:05:23 ddns update: Asus update entry:: return: HTTP/1.1 200 OK^M Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:04:25 GMT^M Server: Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) PHP/5.5.14 OpenSSL/1.0.1h^M X-Powered-By: PHP/5.5.14^M Content-Length: 0^M Connection: close^M Content-Type: text/html^M ^M
Jan  1 00:05:23 ddns update: retval= 0, ddns_return_code (,200)
Jan  1 00:05:23 ddns update: asusddns_update: 0
Jan  1 00:05:24 ddns: ddns update ok
Jan  1 00:05:24 rc_service: ip-up 1292:notify_rc stop_ntpc
Jan  1 00:05:24 rc_service: ip-up 1292:notify_rc start_ntpc
Jan  1 00:05:24 rc_service: waitting "stop_ntpc" via ip-up ...
Feb 27 17:04:29 rc_service: ntp 1363:notify_rc restart_upnp
Feb 27 17:04:29 rc_service: ntp 1363:notify_rc restart_diskmon
Feb 27 17:04:29 rc_service: waitting "restart_upnp" via ntp ...
Feb 27 17:04:29 miniupnpd[1357]: received signal 15, good-bye
Feb 27 17:04:29 miniupnpd[1373]: HTTP listening on port 35768
Feb 27 17:04:29 miniupnpd[1373]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Feb 27 17:04:32 disk monitor: be idle
Feb 27 17:05:03 crond[809]: time disparity of 2186940 minutes detected
Feb 27 17:06:27 dnsmasq-dhcp[801]: Ignoring domain
Feb 27 17:46:57 pppd[1250]: Connection terminated.
Feb 27 17:46:57 pppd[1250]: Modem hangup
Feb 27 17:46:58 WAN Connection: Fail to connect with some issues.
Feb 27 17:46:58 stop_nat_rules: apply the redirect_rules!
Feb 27 17:47:02 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:02 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:02 miniupnpd[1373]: Failed to get ip address for interface ppp0
Feb 27 17:47:04 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:04 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:04 miniupnpd[1373]: Failed to get ip address for interface ppp0
Feb 27 17:47:06 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:06 miniupnpd[1373]: ioctl(s, SIOCGIFADDR, ...): No such device
Feb 27 17:47:06 miniupnpd[1373]: Failed to get ip address for interface ppp0
Feb 27 17:47:07 pppd[1250]: Connected to 00:30:88:00:00:05 via interface vlan100
Feb 27 17:47:07 pppd[1250]: Connect: ppp0 <--> vlan100
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: peer from calling number 00:30:88:00:00:05 authorized
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: local  IP address
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: remote IP address
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: primary   DNS address 212.159.6.10
Feb 27 17:47:08 pppd[1250]: secondary DNS address 212.159.6.9
Feb 27 17:47:08 start_nat_rules: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Feb 27 17:47:09 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 27 17:47:09 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10060 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 27 17:47:09 rc_service: ip-up 1681:notify_rc stop_upnp
Feb 27 17:47:09 rc_service: ip-up 1681:notify_rc start_upnp
Feb 27 17:47:09 rc_service: waitting "stop_upnp" via ip-up ...
Feb 27 17:47:09 miniupnpd[1373]: received signal 15, good-bye
Feb 27 17:47:11 ddns update: ez-ipupdate: starting...
Feb 27 17:47:11 miniupnpd[1747]: HTTP listening on port 52832
Feb 27 17:47:11 miniupnpd[1747]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Feb 27 17:47:13 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
Feb 27 17:47:16 ddns update: connected to ns1.asuscomm.com (103.10.4.108) on port 80.
Feb 27 17:47:17 ddns update: Asus update entry:: return: HTTP/1.1 200 OK^M Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:47:16 GMT^M Server: Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) PHP/5.5.14 OpenSSL/1.0.1h^M X-Powered-By: PHP/5.5.14^M Content-Length: 0^M Connection: close^M Content-Type: text/html^M ^M
Feb 27 17:47:17 ddns update: retval= 0, ddns_return_code (,200)
Feb 27 17:47:17 ddns update: asusddns_update: 0
Feb 27 17:47:18 ddns: ddns update ok
Feb 27 17:47:22 dnsmasq-dhcp[801]: Ignoring domain
Feb 27 18:00:55 rc_service: httpd 807:notify_rc restart_net_and_phy
Feb 27 18:00:58 iTunes: daemon is stoped
Feb 27 18:00:59 FTP Server: daemon is stoped
Feb 27 18:00:59 Samba Server: smb daemon is stoped
Feb 27 18:00:59 kernel: gro disabled
Feb 27 18:01:02 pppd[1250]: Connection terminated.
Feb 27 18:01:04 WAN Connection: Fail to connect with some issues.
Feb 27 18:01:04 stop_nat_rules: apply the redirect_rules!
Feb 27 18:01:07 wanduck exit: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Feb 27 18:01:10 kernel: wl_module_init: passivemode set to 0x0
Feb 27 18:01:10 kernel: wl_module_init: txworkq set to 0x0
Feb 27 18:01:10 kernel: eth1: Broadcom BCM4360 802.11 Wireless Controller 6.37.14.86 (r456083)
Feb 27 18:01:10 kernel: eth2: Broadcom BCM4360 802.11 Wireless Controller 6.37.14.86 (r456083)
Feb 27 18:01:11 miniupnpd[1747]: sendto(udp_notify=6, 192.168.0.254): Invalid argument
Feb 27 18:01:12 stop_nat_rules: apply the redirect_rules!
Feb 27 18:01:12 WAN Connection: Fail to connect with some issues.
Feb 27 18:01:12 dnsmasq[2189]: warning: interface ppp1* does not currently exist
Feb 27 18:01:13 pppd[2195]: pppd 2.4.5 started by admin, uid 0
Feb 27 18:01:13 pppd[2195]: Connected to 00:30:88:00:00:05 via interface vlan100
Feb 27 18:01:13 pppd[2195]: Connect: ppp0 <--> vlan100
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: peer from calling number 00:30:88:00:00:05 authorized
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: local  IP address
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: remote IP address
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: primary   DNS address 212.159.6.10
Feb 27 18:01:14 pppd[2195]: secondary DNS address 212.159.6.9
Feb 27 18:01:14 DSL-AC68U: start httpd
Feb 27 18:01:14 kernel: gro enabled with interval 2
Feb 27 18:01:14 start_nat_rules: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Feb 27 18:01:15 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 27 18:01:15 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10060 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 27 18:01:15 Samba Server: daemon is started
Feb 27 18:01:16 FTP server: daemon is started
Feb 27 18:01:16 rc_service: ip-up 2213:notify_rc stop_upnp
Feb 27 18:01:16 rc_service: waitting "restart_net_and_phy" via  ...
Feb 27 18:01:17 rc_service: ip-up 2213:notify_rc start_upnp
Feb 27 18:01:17 rc_service: waitting "stop_upnp" via ip-up ...
Feb 27 18:01:17 miniupnpd[1747]: received signal 15, good-bye
Feb 27 18:01:17 miniupnpd[1747]: SendSSDPGoodbye: sendto(udp_shutdown=6): No such device
Feb 27 18:01:17 miniupnpd[1747]: Failed to broadcast good-bye notifications
Feb 27 18:01:17 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
Feb 27 18:01:18 miniupnpd[2325]: HTTP listening on port 59973
Feb 27 18:01:18 miniupnpd[2325]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Feb 27 18:01:18 ddns update: ez-ipupdate: starting...
Feb 27 18:01:24 ddns update: connected to ns1.asuscomm.com (103.10.4.108) on port 80.
Feb 27 18:01:24 start_nat_rules: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Feb 27 18:01:24 ddns update: Asus update entry:: return: HTTP/1.1 200 OK^M Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:01:24 GMT^M Server: Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) PHP/5.5.14 OpenSSL/1.0.1h^M X-Powered-By: PHP/5.5.14^M Content-Length: 0^M Connection: close^M Content-Type: text/html^M ^M
Feb 27 18:01:24 ddns update: retval= 0, ddns_return_code (,200)
Feb 27 18:01:24 ddns update: asusddns_update: 0
Feb 27 18:01:25 ddns: ddns update ok
Feb 27 18:01:25 zcip client: configured 169.254.65.84
Feb 27 18:01:30 rc_service: watchdog 815:notify_rc restart_wireless
Feb 27 18:01:37 kernel: wl_module_init: passivemode set to 0x0
Feb 27 18:01:37 kernel: wl_module_init: txworkq set to 0x0
Feb 27 18:01:37 kernel: eth1: Broadcom BCM4360 802.11 Wireless Controller 6.37.14.86 (r456083)
Feb 27 18:01:37 kernel: eth2: Broadcom BCM4360 802.11 Wireless Controller 6.37.14.86 (r456083)

Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Well so far that level of CRC errors is fairly respectable. My other immediate observation is that the modem/router seems to be performing better, higher DS sync speed for a slightly higher SNRM
Can you clarify "I have the filter plugged in and a 3 meter adsl telephone cable plugged in"? Is that 3m cable for the phone or the modem/router?
Iffor the modem/router then is it a round cable or a flat one?  What type of phone - DECT or corded?
I'll take a few minutes to read and digest the rest of your post Wink
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Sorry just noted the N300, no correlation between use of that and sync drops I trust?
Edit: woops -made the cardinal sin of mistaking the achievable sync for the actual  Embarrassed Embarrassed
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

As far as the log goes, there is more in it that probably means a lot more to you than it does to me. Out of the bits that seem relevant, nothing seems untoward - to me anyway, but I'm not the best person to judge all of that lot Wink
The trick with any dropping connection is to try and see if it correlates with anything happening in your property eg. Central Heating coming on.
But equally, faulty NTE5A's have been known to cause these issues. Shame they didn't fit a Mk3 SSFP for you. (aka vDSL plate).
scotland731
Dabbler
Posts: 23
Registered: ‎13-05-2014

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

After another query from my family asking if I'm doing something with the internet, here is the relevant router log.
I have killed any p2p software on my nas and only have iphones, tablets and pc's using normal internet activities.
Feb 28 22:45:20 WAN Connection: Fail to connect with some issues.
Feb 28 22:45:20 stop_nat_rules: apply the redirect_rules!
Feb 28 22:45:22 pppd[12095]: Connection terminated.
Feb 28 22:45:22 pppd[12095]: Modem hangup
Feb 28 22:45:33 pppd[12095]: Connected to 00:30:88:00:00:05 via interface vlan100
Feb 28 22:45:33 pppd[12095]: Connect: ppp0 <--> vlan100
Feb 28 22:45:41 pppd[12095]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Feb 28 22:45:41 pppd[12095]: peer from calling number 00:30:88:00:00:05 authorized
Feb 28 22:45:42 pppd[12095]: local  IP address
Feb 28 22:45:42 pppd[12095]: remote IP address
Feb 28 22:45:42 pppd[12095]: primary  DNS address 212.159.6.10
Feb 28 22:45:42 pppd[12095]: secondary DNS address 212.159.6.9
Feb 28 22:45:42 rc_service: ip-up 13867:notify_rc start_rdnssd
Feb 28 22:45:42 rdnssd[12249]: Child process hung up unexpectedly, aborting
Feb 28 22:45:43 start_nat_rules: apply the nat_rules(/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_vlan100)!
Feb 28 22:45:44 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 28 22:45:44 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10060 is big. Consider r2q change.
Feb 28 22:45:44 rc_service: ip-up 13867:notify_rc stop_upnp
Feb 28 22:45:44 rc_service: ip-up 13867:notify_rc start_upnp
Feb 28 22:45:44 rc_service: waitting "stop_upnp" via ip-up ...
Feb 28 22:45:44 miniupnpd[12263]: received signal 15, good-bye
Feb 28 22:45:45 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
Feb 28 22:45:46 miniupnpd[13958]: HTTP listening on port 52724
Feb 28 22:45:46 miniupnpd[13958]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Feb 28 22:45:46 ddns update: ez-ipupdate: starting...
Feb 28 22:45:56 ddns update: connected to ns1.asuscomm.com (103.10.4.108) on port 80.
Feb 28 22:45:57 ddns update: Asus update entry:: return: HTTP/1.1 200 OK^M Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:45:56 GMT^M Server: Apache/2.4.9 (Unix) PHP/5.5.14 OpenSSL/1.0.1h^M X-Powered-By: PHP/5.5.14^M Content-Length: 0^M Connection: close^M Content-Type: text/html^M ^M
Feb 28 22:45:57 ddns update: retval= 0, ddns_return_code (,200)
Feb 28 22:45:57 ddns update: asusddns_update: 0
Feb 28 22:45:57 ddns: ddns update ok
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

I'm afraid the detail in that log doesn't tell me anything about the state of the DSL, so the stats for the same time would be/have been helpful. You may have just have had a PPP session drop (not loss of sync) which may/will occur when there is a  Current Line speed (Login required) update. The Current Line Speed updates to match the BT IP Profile, which of course changes after a sync speed change.This update should happen within hours of the IP Profile change but has been known to take days and is dependent on BT servers sending the update to Plusnet's system.
It's a good idea to check your Current Line speed (Login required) every time you have a PPP session loss if there is no other obvious reason for the loss. Unless you are on a fixed IP address, that will also change as does usually the Gateway you are on
Anotherone
Champion
Posts: 19,107
Thanks: 457
Fixes: 21
Registered: ‎31-08-2007

Re: 10 adsl disconnections required

Went to do some digging and found that possibly the issue could be firmware related. Can you check you have the latest issue?