so much for pro
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Broadband
- :
- so much for pro
- « Previous
- Next »
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:24 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:33 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I strongly suggest that you stop rebooting to try and get yourself onto a different pipe.
If you do this continually you *will* be put onto a banded profile by BT.
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:34 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Ok asbo once your on the other gatway post your results.
i will be away for an hour grub time.
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:36 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:36 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 4:58 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
wonder what caused the packet loss at the end there ;).
yeah on pcl-ag04 now.
like i said james on the fone ive not had the latency on thn-ag2 the same as chirs. the below graph is what i was capturing before the gods switched me net off and on. again the spike is inline with a burst of upload maxing so nothing to worrie about on my connection.
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 5:03 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Enterprise Architect - Network & OSS
Plusnet Technology
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 5:06 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
well i cant remember if i switched gateways last nite or the nite before to compare what thn-ag2 was like compared to pcl-ag04 but when i did it thn-ag2 was still playing up past midnight but like i say cant remember if it was last night or not so the pipes might not have bein balanced then.
back to the OP's latency then
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 5:27 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
so gateway is not the problem
Pinging bbc.co.uk
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Packets: Sent = 40, Received = 40, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 64ms
Control-C
Re: so much for pro
30-10-2009 5:33 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Date Download Speed Upload Speed
Today 17:31 13119 kbps (1.64MB/s) 991 kbps (124kB/s) Share
Today 17:30 8078 kbps (1.01MB/s) 999 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 17:30 11001 kbps (1.38MB/s) 1004 kbps (126kB/s) Share
Today 17:29 9297 kbps (1.16MB/s) 1003 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 16:39 14809 kbps (1.85MB/s) 1003 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 15:00 7490 kbps (936kB/s) 974 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Today 15:00 11864 kbps (1.48MB/s) 992 kbps (124kB/s) Share
Today 14:05 15167 kbps (1.9MB/s) 1001 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 13:45 15122 kbps (1.89MB/s) 1000 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:17 14144 kbps (1.77MB/s) 980 kbps (123kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:13 10983 kbps (1.37MB/s) 976 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:08 5632 kbps (704kB/s) 977 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:07 6849 kbps (856kB/s) 961 kbps (120kB/s) Share
Yesterday 19:45 15075 kbps (1.88MB/s) 977 kbps (122kB/s) Share
- « Previous
- Next »
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page