cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

so much for pro

scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Thanks: 1
Registered: ‎03-11-2007

Re: so much for pro

@ chris. when we can get the chance to get on to pcl-ag04. we will get a compare of your latency which should help pin point better where to start looking for the fault
James
Grafter
Posts: 21,036
Thanks: 5
Registered: ‎04-04-2007

Re: so much for pro

Guys,
I strongly suggest that you stop rebooting to try and get yourself onto a different pipe.
If you do this continually you *will* be put onto a banded profile by BT.
chrisyoung
Grafter
Posts: 110
Registered: ‎22-04-2009

Re: so much for pro

Yeah i tried to dissconnect and reconect these and took me 5 mins too.
Ok asbo once your on the other gatway post your results.
i will be away for an hour grub time. Grin  
chrisyoung
Grafter
Posts: 110
Registered: ‎22-04-2009

Re: so much for pro

Ok james thats good to know.
scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Thanks: 1
Registered: ‎03-11-2007

Re: so much for pro

am not resyncing thoe james just ppp session disconnect / reconnect and also advised chirs to do the same, dont tell me the dlm gets its knickes in a twist about this to   Huh
scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Thanks: 1
Registered: ‎03-11-2007

Re: so much for pro

cheecky  Grin
wonder what caused the packet loss at the end there  ;).
yeah on pcl-ag04 now.
like i said james on the fone ive not had the latency on thn-ag2 the same as chirs. the below graph is what i was capturing before the gods switched me net off  and on. again the spike is inline with a burst of upload maxing so nothing to worrie about on my connection.
dave
Plusnet Help Team
Plusnet Help Team
Posts: 12,257
Thanks: 306
Fixes: 4
Registered: ‎04-04-2007

Re: so much for pro

You mean me kicking you.... The RADIUS works a little different on 20CN to 21CN, we balance the sessions across the sites rather than BT, there's no such thing as extra entries on the BT RADIUS. I'm not sure how clever we've set it up but it may be doing far better balancing by seeing  than THN-AG2 was less utilised than PCL-AG04 which would make sense as PCL-AG04 has more sessions and slightly more bandwidth in use. I'll have to check with Carl how intelligent it is.
Dave Tomlinson
Enterprise Architect - Network & OSS
Plusnet Technology
scootie
Grafter
Posts: 4,799
Thanks: 1
Registered: ‎03-11-2007

Re: so much for pro

o rite. learn somthing new every day
well i cant remember if i switched gateways last nite or the nite before to compare what thn-ag2 was like compared to pcl-ag04 but when i did it thn-ag2 was still playing up past midnight but like i say cant remember if it was last night or not so the pipes might not have bein balanced then.
back to the OP's latency then
chrisyoung
Grafter
Posts: 110
Registered: ‎22-04-2009

Re: so much for pro

i have still got problems here and now on pcl-ag04.
so gateway is not the problem
Pinging bbc.co.uk
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=137ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=121

    Packets: Sent = 40, Received = 40, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 64ms
Control-C
chrisyoung
Grafter
Posts: 110
Registered: ‎22-04-2009

Re: so much for pro

my bandwidth seems to be going up and down too.

Date Download Speed Upload Speed 
Today 17:31 13119 kbps (1.64MB/s) 991 kbps (124kB/s) Share
Today 17:30 8078 kbps (1.01MB/s) 999 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 17:30 11001 kbps (1.38MB/s) 1004 kbps (126kB/s) Share
Today 17:29 9297 kbps (1.16MB/s) 1003 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 16:39 14809 kbps (1.85MB/s) 1003 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 15:00 7490 kbps (936kB/s) 974 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Today 15:00 11864 kbps (1.48MB/s) 992 kbps (124kB/s) Share
Today 14:05 15167 kbps (1.9MB/s) 1001 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Today 13:45 15122 kbps (1.89MB/s) 1000 kbps (125kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:17 14144 kbps (1.77MB/s) 980 kbps (123kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:13 10983 kbps (1.37MB/s) 976 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:08 5632 kbps (704kB/s) 977 kbps (122kB/s) Share
Yesterday 21:07 6849 kbps (856kB/s) 961 kbps (120kB/s) Share
Yesterday 19:45 15075 kbps (1.88MB/s) 977 kbps (122kB/s) Share