Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
More email delays
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Broadband
- :
- More email delays
More email delays
03-12-2007 4:42 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I thought these delays were solved now? Clearly not as I've just received one that was delayed for 3 hours.
What's going on?
X-Daemon-Classification: INNOCENT
Envelope-to: [my email address]
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:26:15 +0000
Received: from pih-criticalpath02.plus.net ([84.92.7.53])
by pih-sunmxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1IzB6K-0001gG-0X
for [my email address]; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:12:44 +0000
Received: from relay02.pair.com (209.68.5.16) by pih-criticalpath02.plus.net (7.3.118.15)
id 4743CC900F1AD0A5 for [my email address]; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:12:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 31913 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2007 13:12:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.64?) (unknown)
by unknown with SMTP; 3 Dec 2007 13:12:35 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 86.140.103.189
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:12:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Yo
From: someone <their email address>
To: Me <my email address>
Message-ID: <C379B141.9C12%their email address>
Thread-Topic: Yo
Thread-Index: Acgx17iTTRQDtnjZQia9PcQJ2zAgSgD1nG1k
In-Reply-To: <5BEC0A9CEDAB4508A78083BD69C37A13@AdminPC>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B_3279532355_243746"
X-PN-VirusFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v4.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Dec 3 16:26:17 2007
What's going on?
X-Daemon-Classification: INNOCENT
Envelope-to: [my email address]
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:26:15 +0000
Received: from pih-criticalpath02.plus.net ([84.92.7.53])
by pih-sunmxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1IzB6K-0001gG-0X
for [my email address]; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:12:44 +0000
Received: from relay02.pair.com (209.68.5.16) by pih-criticalpath02.plus.net (7.3.118.15)
id 4743CC900F1AD0A5 for [my email address]; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:12:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 31913 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2007 13:12:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.64?) (unknown)
by unknown with SMTP; 3 Dec 2007 13:12:35 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 86.140.103.189
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:12:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Yo
From: someone <their email address>
To: Me <my email address>
Message-ID: <C379B141.9C12%their email address>
Thread-Topic: Yo
Thread-Index: Acgx17iTTRQDtnjZQia9PcQJ2zAgSgD1nG1k
In-Reply-To: <5BEC0A9CEDAB4508A78083BD69C37A13@AdminPC>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B_3279532355_243746"
X-PN-VirusFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v4.00)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Dec 3 16:26:17 2007
Message 1 of 4
(1,694 Views)
3 REPLIES 3
Re: More email delays
03-12-2007 5:17 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I'll take a look at this now. We were fairly confident that the delays were no more but it does seem that something got held up before this message was delivered to storage.
Bob Pullen
Plusnet Product Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵
Message 2 of 4
(485 Views)
Re: More email delays
03-12-2007 5:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Cheers Bob!
Message 3 of 4
(485 Views)
Re: More email delays
03-12-2007 5:30 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Looks like this is the culprit -
Suggests that sunmxcore17 was under high load at the time and the Clam daemon failed to respond. Basically the virus/spam filtering processes couldn't complete so the email got queued.
Directly related to load and definitely something Postini should help avoid.
R=mysql_virusdspam T=local_virusdspam defer (-24):
transport filter process failed (75) while writing to tmp/1196687564.H571130P11739.pih-sunmxcore17.plus.net
Suggests that sunmxcore17 was under high load at the time and the Clam daemon failed to respond. Basically the virus/spam filtering processes couldn't complete so the email got queued.
Directly related to load and definitely something Postini should help avoid.
Bob Pullen
Plusnet Product Team
If I've been helpful then please give thanks ⤵
Message 4 of 4
(485 Views)
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page