<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Emails wrongly rejected as spam in Tech Help - Software/Hardware etc</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Emails-wrongly-rejected-as-spam/m-p/1921809#M94447</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have received an email from MAILER-DAEMON@mailchannels.net stating that my latest email to my nine fellow trustees of the charity has been rejected by just three recipients as "spam".:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host mx.avasin.plus.net[212.159.8.200]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; said: 552 Spam Message Rejected&amp;nbsp; (in reply to end of DATA command)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hundreds of other similar emails concerned with the administration of the charity have been delivered to these addresses over the years without problem. I have no idea why this message has suddenly been classed as "spam". We are a small charity with about 150 members, run by 10 overworked trustees without any real expertise in IT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please could you let me know how do I remedy this situation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 08:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FOTMOS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-24T08:00:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Emails wrongly rejected as spam</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Emails-wrongly-rejected-as-spam/m-p/1921809#M94447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have received an email from MAILER-DAEMON@mailchannels.net stating that my latest email to my nine fellow trustees of the charity has been rejected by just three recipients as "spam".:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host mx.avasin.plus.net[212.159.8.200]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; said: 552 Spam Message Rejected&amp;nbsp; (in reply to end of DATA command)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hundreds of other similar emails concerned with the administration of the charity have been delivered to these addresses over the years without problem. I have no idea why this message has suddenly been classed as "spam". We are a small charity with about 150 members, run by 10 overworked trustees without any real expertise in IT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please could you let me know how do I remedy this situation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 08:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Emails-wrongly-rejected-as-spam/m-p/1921809#M94447</guid>
      <dc:creator>FOTMOS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-24T08:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

