<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Optimal MTU for wifi? in Tech Help - Software/Hardware etc</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12794#M1093</link>
    <description>Should the MTU size of a PC on a wifi network be identical to that of the WAN side of a network?&lt;BR /&gt;Typically the WAN side is set to 1500 bytes.&lt;BR /&gt;My Linux system defaults:-&lt;BR /&gt;Loopback MTU= 16436&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet MTU = 1500&lt;BR /&gt;Wifi = 1500&lt;BR /&gt;On a WEP "security" wifi network is this optimal?&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VileReynard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-03T19:38:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimal MTU for wifi?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12794#M1093</link>
      <description>Should the MTU size of a PC on a wifi network be identical to that of the WAN side of a network?&lt;BR /&gt;Typically the WAN side is set to 1500 bytes.&lt;BR /&gt;My Linux system defaults:-&lt;BR /&gt;Loopback MTU= 16436&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet MTU = 1500&lt;BR /&gt;Wifi = 1500&lt;BR /&gt;On a WEP "security" wifi network is this optimal?&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12794#M1093</guid>
      <dc:creator>VileReynard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-03T19:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimal MTU for wifi?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12795#M1094</link>
      <description>Having them all the same (ignore the linux loopback, its an internal pipe) is the best policy.&lt;BR /&gt;Whether 1500 is actually the best for your connection you can only find out by experimenting with some other values.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12795#M1094</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Vaughan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-03T19:40:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimal MTU for wifi?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12796#M1095</link>
      <description>The &lt;SPAN style="font-size:14pt"&gt;big no, no&lt;/SPAN&gt; is having the PC MTU larger than the WAN as this can cause fragmentation if the MTU path discovery doesn't work - that can apply to wired and wireless although the effect is less noticeable on wired.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:28:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12796#M1095</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-03T20:28:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimal MTU for wifi?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12797#M1096</link>
      <description>As jelv says, always ensure your router MTU is the same or greater than windows. &lt;BR /&gt;There are a number of ways you can tweak this. I find 1430 works best for me. But it's different for each user. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.kitz.co.uk" target="_blank"&gt;www.kitz.co.uk&lt;/A&gt; is a great took to help you tweak it.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:21:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Tech-Help-Software-Hardware-etc/Optimal-MTU-for-wifi/m-p/12797#M1096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-12T22:21:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

