<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is PN liable? in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278984#M66620</link>
    <description>I'd say this was relevant:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;B&gt;62 Requirement for contract terms and notices to be fair&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(1)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; An unfair term of a consumer contract is not binding on the consumer.&lt;BR /&gt;(2)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; An unfair consumer notice is not binding on the consumer.&lt;BR /&gt;(3)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This does not prevent the consumer from relying on the term or notice if the consumer chooses to do so.&lt;BR /&gt;(4)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; A term is unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, &lt;B&gt;it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Imposing a £50 fee if you fail to be there for an engineer's appointment with no automatic compensation if the engineer does not keep the appointment is patently a significant imbalance!&lt;BR /&gt;I'd suggest this topic ought to be moved to feedback.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-30T11:05:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is PN liable?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278983#M66619</link>
      <description>Under the &lt;A href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/pdfs/ukpga_20150015_en.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Consumer Rights Act 2015&lt;/A&gt; I wonder how PlusNet will be exposed when OpenReach fail to turn up for an appointment?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278983#M66619</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlaricAdair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T10:18:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is PN liable?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278984#M66620</link>
      <description>I'd say this was relevant:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;B&gt;62 Requirement for contract terms and notices to be fair&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(1)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; An unfair term of a consumer contract is not binding on the consumer.&lt;BR /&gt;(2)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; An unfair consumer notice is not binding on the consumer.&lt;BR /&gt;(3)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; This does not prevent the consumer from relying on the term or notice if the consumer chooses to do so.&lt;BR /&gt;(4)&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; A term is unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, &lt;B&gt;it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Imposing a £50 fee if you fail to be there for an engineer's appointment with no automatic compensation if the engineer does not keep the appointment is patently a significant imbalance!&lt;BR /&gt;I'd suggest this topic ought to be moved to feedback.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278984#M66620</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T11:05:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is PN liable?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278985#M66621</link>
      <description>Section 39 "Supply by transmission and facilities for continued transmission"&lt;BR /&gt;Could be a problem for PN if supplying TV to rural areas....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;I&gt;The following provisions apply to all digital content transmitted to the&lt;BR /&gt;consumer on each occasion under the facility, while it is provided under the&lt;BR /&gt;contract, as they apply to the digital content first supplied—&lt;BR /&gt;(a) section 34 (quality);&lt;BR /&gt;(b) section 35 (fitness for a particular purpose);&lt;BR /&gt;(c) section 36 (description)&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;or even this bit when someone is signing up for a service:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;B&gt;Section 50&lt;/B&gt; &lt;I&gt; Information about the trader or service to be binding&lt;BR /&gt;(1) Every contract to supply a service is to be treated as including as a term of the contract anything that is said or written to the consumer, by or on behalf of the trader, about the trader or the service, if—&lt;BR /&gt;(a) it is taken into account by the consumer when deciding to enter into the contract, &lt;BR /&gt;or&lt;BR /&gt;(b) it is taken into account by the consumer when making any decision about the service after entering into the contract.&lt;/I&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Is-PN-liable/m-p/1278985#M66621</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlaricAdair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-30T12:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

