<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Uninterested so called Technical experts. in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Uninterested-so-called-Technical-experts/m-p/1260149#M64132</link>
    <description>Can you tell us what you typically get for a ping to bbc.co.uk (that tends to give a reliable 'baseline')?&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of figure are you expecting for FTTC?&lt;BR /&gt;Does your equipment give access to DSL line stats?&amp;nbsp; If so can you post as much as possible - particularly interested in whather you have 'delay' listed for upstream and downstream.&lt;BR /&gt;Non-interleaved FTTC should give 5-10ms depending on location (could be higher if you're a very long way from London), interleaving typically adds 7-8ms for each direction in which it's applied so a perfectly good but interleaved FTTC connection could have a base ping of around 25ms.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>w23</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-17T11:34:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Uninterested so called Technical experts.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Uninterested-so-called-Technical-experts/m-p/1260148#M64131</link>
      <description>I would like to complain to this Forum about the so called technical experts fed to us by Plusnet. I complained recently about online gaming pings to these so called technical experts and they barely new what I was on about. My ping to Google.co.uk is double what it should be for a fibre user. It is even double that of people on the same exchange. My equipment is far superior to that provided by PlusNet and I can prove the problem is not my equipment. I like to game around the world and this ping delay is making this impossible. This problem seems to come and go so there must be a reason for it. I am basically getting ADSL pings for the price of fibre, what other business could get away with this?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Uninterested-so-called-Technical-experts/m-p/1260148#M64131</guid>
      <dc:creator>thisISPsucks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-17T11:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Uninterested so called Technical experts.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Uninterested-so-called-Technical-experts/m-p/1260149#M64132</link>
      <description>Can you tell us what you typically get for a ping to bbc.co.uk (that tends to give a reliable 'baseline')?&lt;BR /&gt;What kind of figure are you expecting for FTTC?&lt;BR /&gt;Does your equipment give access to DSL line stats?&amp;nbsp; If so can you post as much as possible - particularly interested in whather you have 'delay' listed for upstream and downstream.&lt;BR /&gt;Non-interleaved FTTC should give 5-10ms depending on location (could be higher if you're a very long way from London), interleaving typically adds 7-8ms for each direction in which it's applied so a perfectly good but interleaved FTTC connection could have a base ping of around 25ms.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Uninterested-so-called-Technical-experts/m-p/1260149#M64132</guid>
      <dc:creator>w23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-17T11:34:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

