<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance graphs removed in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252773#M62918</link>
    <description>As noted elsewhere the link to the performance graphs has been removed and also the pages themselves have gone. The main one used to be at &lt;A href="http://www.plus.net/support/service/network_performance/broadband_bandwidth_usage.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.plus.net/support/service/network_performance/broadband_bandwidth_usage.shtml&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Just what are the motives behind removing those pages?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-07T07:39:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252773#M62918</link>
      <description>As noted elsewhere the link to the performance graphs has been removed and also the pages themselves have gone. The main one used to be at &lt;A href="http://www.plus.net/support/service/network_performance/broadband_bandwidth_usage.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.plus.net/support/service/network_performance/broadband_bandwidth_usage.shtml&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Just what are the motives behind removing those pages?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252773#M62918</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T07:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252774#M62919</link>
      <description>We have removed the network performance graphs as they contained commercially sensitive data. We were the only provider to publish this sort of sensitive information in an increasingly competitive marketplace.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:53:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252774#M62919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T07:53:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252775#M62920</link>
      <description>another useful page gone for a burton</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:01:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252775#M62920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T08:01:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252776#M62921</link>
      <description>Forums will be next.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252776#M62921</guid>
      <dc:creator>avatastic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T08:14:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252777#M62922</link>
      <description>That thought had occurred to me too!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252777#M62922</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T08:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252778#M62923</link>
      <description>and the first one who makes comments about Rats and Sinking Ships will be reported to the remaining moderators&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@DD2C576E9659EC19DB321D3F15B5069C/images/emoticons/grin.gif" alt="Grin" title="Grin" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252778#M62923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T08:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252779#M62924</link>
      <description>This is beginning to look serious.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:55:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252779#M62924</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T08:55:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252780#M62925</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Chris&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;We have removed the network performance graphs as they contained commercially sensitive data. We were the only provider to publish this sort of sensitive information in an increasingly competitive marketplace.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is rather disappointing - your comment regarding &lt;I&gt;We were the only provider to publish this sort of sensitive information...&lt;/I&gt; is EXACTLY the sort of thing that made me choose PlusNet over other providers. I want to know as much information as possible about my broadband (which I consider a critical part of infrastructure).&lt;BR /&gt;There is far too much secrecy in this marketplace - from BT locking down the FTTC modem so end users can no longer do any diagnosis themselves, to now this preventing us from at a glance identifying one potential cause of issues.&lt;BR /&gt;I left Entanet because they removed almost exactly the same information you have now removed.&lt;BR /&gt;Would it be possible to re-introduce this, perhaps with the most "commercially sensitive data" removed - e.g. using general percentages instead of actual figures etc?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Marcus</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252780#M62925</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcusJClifford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T09:08:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252781#M62926</link>
      <description>LMAO...&lt;BR /&gt;Ciao Plusnet&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@DD2C576E9659EC19DB321D3F15B5069C/images/emoticons/grin.gif" alt="Grin" title="Grin" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252781#M62926</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlmclaren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T09:26:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252782#M62927</link>
      <description>They did say they were going to remove these graphs in the original capacity thread. so I guess they eventually got round to it.&lt;BR /&gt;Am I surprised? no.&lt;BR /&gt;I also think these forums wont be removed, but further downgrading of support response on here may happen so its more in line with BT retail forumd.&lt;BR /&gt;Of course if complaints on here get high enough they may possible consider ditching the forums for damage control.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252782#M62927</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrcoluk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T09:33:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252783#M62928</link>
      <description>I think we will see more complaints on here , as Tickets removed , Chat is IFFY to be available , Phone calls are ridiculous wait times , so&amp;nbsp; the only access to PN staff is VIA the forums&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@39CAA4D3C5337609D22BCCF670FC8D42/images/emoticons/embarrassed.gif" alt="Embarrassed" title="Embarrassed" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252783#M62928</guid>
      <dc:creator>rongtw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T10:50:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252784#M62929</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Chris&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;We have removed the network performance graphs as they&lt;SPAN style="color:red;"&gt; contained commercially sensitive data&lt;/SPAN&gt;. ....only provider to publish this sort of sensitive information in an increasingly competitive marketplace&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Really?&lt;BR /&gt;Last time pn were saying :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;... the graphs on our website are&lt;SPAN style="color:red;"&gt; outdated &lt;/SPAN&gt;and need updating or removing, &lt;SPAN style="color:red;"&gt;they don't realistically reflect the real-life capacity of our network or peaks across the network&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,135389.msg1212448.html#msg1212448" target="_blank"&gt;http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,135389.msg1212448.html#msg1212448&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(BGN's) Juniper mx960&amp;nbsp;  &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@39CAA4D3C5337609D22BCCF670FC8D42/images/emoticons/embarrassed.gif" alt="Embarrassed" title="Embarrassed" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://media.wiley.com/product_data/coverImage300/40/11181737/1118173740.jpg" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How it comes accross....... &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@39CAA4D3C5337609D22BCCF670FC8D42/images/emoticons/embarrassed.gif" alt="Embarrassed" title="Embarrassed" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:08:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252784#M62929</guid>
      <dc:creator>leader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T15:08:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252785#M62930</link>
      <description>I said this would happen a while ago and it doesn't surprise me at all. The only surprise is the length of time it has taken for them to remove it.&lt;BR /&gt;If this kind of data wasn't sensitive, ISPs all over the world would be publishing it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252785#M62930</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T17:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252786#M62931</link>
      <description>Its only &amp;nbsp;sensitive to the &lt;I&gt;PR &lt;/I&gt;department.&lt;BR /&gt;Its &amp;nbsp;a network embarrassment</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252786#M62931</guid>
      <dc:creator>leader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T18:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252787#M62932</link>
      <description>Knowing the number of users and the growth in users intraday is highly sensitive. &lt;BR /&gt;Equally, you can make an educated guess of their WBMC bandwidth and usage based on what was displayed.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252787#M62932</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T18:49:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252788#M62933</link>
      <description>Again only to the PR department &lt;BR /&gt;Come on Andy, I know your not that naive on how things work.&lt;BR /&gt;Feel free to carry on deflecting - &amp;nbsp;I do admire &amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@104CD63F9302A50EF5EC70FE32BB8AA1/images/emoticons/smiley.gif" alt="Smiley" title="Smiley" /&gt; &amp;nbsp;- its a skill I sadly lack. &lt;BR /&gt;Off Back to the peanut gallery.......</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252788#M62933</guid>
      <dc:creator>leader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T18:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252789#M62934</link>
      <description>The number of users is the most sensitive data there. No ISP is going to publish on a daily basis the number of users it has. The UK ISP market is competitive enough - handing over free information like this isn't something that any of the big 6 would willingly want to do.&lt;BR /&gt;The bandwidth graphs would have been more sensitive if they included all the end points.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252789#M62934</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T19:03:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252790#M62935</link>
      <description>So please explain how changing the graph of connected users to show percentages instead of actual figures would be commercially sensitive.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252790#M62935</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T19:06:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252791#M62936</link>
      <description>Have they done that?&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There were enough problems with the existing graphs not being up to date or working correctly all the time. Good luck getting them to spend resources to fix it with something new.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:09:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252791#M62936</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T19:09:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance graphs removed</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252792#M62937</link>
      <description>Perhaps you'd care to explain what the "enough problems" with "Collated Users Online" graphs were?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 21:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Performance-graphs-removed/m-p/1252792#M62937</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anotherone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-07T21:02:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

