<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product  in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198050#M57691</link>
    <description>Probably not as it wouldn't affect jitter and latency to specific hosts as it i think just prioritises throughput rates&amp;nbsp; by a small amount</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deathtrap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-01T23:40:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198046#M57687</link>
      <description>With the complaints &amp;nbsp;about peak time issues &amp;nbsp;I was pondering &amp;nbsp;over solutions and came up with this idea &lt;BR /&gt;Plusnet &amp;nbsp;launch a new but more expensive FTTC 80/20 service aimed at &amp;nbsp;those who expect their bb to be free from all the peak time issues&lt;BR /&gt;in return for a higher monthly fee, we would get better routing /peering &amp;nbsp;and a priority over other customers so lower contention on your network, throughput speeds would only be restricted by the BTW IP profile (so no plusnet shadow) and no Fiddling with traffic, that's the end users job should they need or want to do this&lt;BR /&gt;and finally non of this&amp;nbsp; porn filtering on by default</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:47:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198046#M57687</guid>
      <dc:creator>deathtrap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-01T19:47:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198047#M57688</link>
      <description>WBC Elevated is an additional £3/month excluding the VAT according to the &lt;A href="https://www.btwholesale.com/pages/static/Library/Pricing_and_Contractual_Information/Part_7_BT_Wholesale_Broadband_Connect__WBC_/index.htm" target="_blank"&gt;WBC Price List&lt;/A&gt; spreadsheet. It's almost as if there's already something that would give your traffic higher priority over the BTWholesale network. Perhaps you'd want that as part of it.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198047#M57688</guid>
      <dc:creator>ejs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-01T20:13:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198048#M57689</link>
      <description>for the sake of £3 why not, as long as it actually made a difference ,and yes they could already do this, but i think there's more to&amp;nbsp; having peak times free of issues than adding this £3 option</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:24:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198048#M57689</guid>
      <dc:creator>deathtrap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-01T20:24:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198049#M57690</link>
      <description>would this option help with gaming ? as i get peak time problems,&amp;nbsp; but still have a decent connection but still find i have to gateway hop to find a gateway the plays ok&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@0FA1396AC0773F33E2DC472BB4F75D3C/images/emoticons/wink.gif" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198049#M57690</guid>
      <dc:creator>rongtw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-01T23:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why don't plusnet launch a new FTTC product</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198050#M57691</link>
      <description>Probably not as it wouldn't affect jitter and latency to specific hosts as it i think just prioritises throughput rates&amp;nbsp; by a small amount</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Why-don-t-plusnet-launch-a-new-FTTC-product/m-p/1198050#M57691</guid>
      <dc:creator>deathtrap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-01T23:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

