<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kbps or KBps? in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630806#M4931</link>
    <description>As far as I can tell, John isn't proposing that Plusnet change the way they express speeds - merely that they explain the two different methods for expressing speeds, and how theirs compares to the other one. I think it's not a bad idea as there is quite a bit of confusion on the matter out there.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Be3G</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:25:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630804#M4929</link>
      <description>I've seen a number of posts (most recently on TBB) where people are complaining about not getting the speeds specified for the product along the lines of&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;I'm only getting 15KBps when the expected speed is 128KBps&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In actual fact the product specification says 128K&lt;B&gt;b&lt;/B&gt;ps which is 16KBps so the product is running to spec.&lt;BR /&gt;Would it not be an idea to highlight on pages such as &lt;A href="http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality_broadband/speed.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality_broadband/speed.shtml&lt;/A&gt; that the tables specify bits per second whereas many software applications report speeds in bytes per second and that to convert you divide by 8?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630804#M4929</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630805#M4930</link>
      <description>I think it's a tough call.&lt;BR /&gt;We sell an upto 8Mbps product.&amp;nbsp; Should we start saying we sell an upto 1MBps service?&lt;BR /&gt;Broadband speeds are always reported in kilobits and megabits per second, but often people will prefer to see kilobytes and megabytes when referring to download speds.&lt;BR /&gt;It's a bit like six of one and half a dozen of another.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630805#M4930</guid>
      <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630806#M4931</link>
      <description>As far as I can tell, John isn't proposing that Plusnet change the way they express speeds - merely that they explain the two different methods for expressing speeds, and how theirs compares to the other one. I think it's not a bad idea as there is quite a bit of confusion on the matter out there.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630806#M4931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Be3G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630807#M4932</link>
      <description>i 2nd this idea. &lt;BR /&gt;i belive jelv has not put forward that plusnet change the speeds qouted all over the website, just that a wee note that is visable on the expected speeds page where the customers are geting what speed there package is designed to run at on diffrent traffic and place a wee bit of extra info for PN's customers.&lt;BR /&gt;i can only see less of what a appear to be negative mis guided threads about PN on other forums coming from this for so little change of the website</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630807#M4932</guid>
      <dc:creator>scootie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:32:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630808#M4933</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Be3G&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;As far as I can tell, John isn't proposing that Plusnet change the way they express speeds - merely that they explain the two different methods for expressing speeds, and how theirs compares to the other one. I think it's not a bad idea as there is quite a bit of confusion on the matter out there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Prezacerly!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630808#M4933</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:35:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kbps or KBps?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630809#M4934</link>
      <description>I'll make the suggestion.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Kbps-or-KBps/m-p/630809#M4934</guid>
      <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-17T14:39:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

