<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Commenting on library items in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044390#M45089</link>
    <description>Yes, the Library has a few issues, in particular with keeping you logged on. It's on the workstack to get fixed, but other things take priority at the moment.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-11-11T11:28:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Commenting on library items</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044389#M45088</link>
      <description>Just been reading Chris P's new guides to fault finding and sought to comment on one.&lt;BR /&gt;The comment box said "You are logged in as Townman"&lt;BR /&gt;First attempt was rejected because "You must be logged on"&lt;BR /&gt;A later attempt was successful, but an advice notice stated that "comments from non logged on persons must be inspected before being published" even though the comment was marked as being from "Townman".&lt;BR /&gt;I think something is a little broke!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044389#M45088</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-11T11:00:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commenting on library items</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044390#M45089</link>
      <description>Yes, the Library has a few issues, in particular with keeping you logged on. It's on the workstack to get fixed, but other things take priority at the moment.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044390#M45089</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-11T11:28:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commenting on library items</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044391#M45090</link>
      <description>Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for the prompt reply.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure that there are things of a much higher priority.&amp;nbsp; Is there a list somewhere of such know issues that users can consult before providing feedback, thereby lessen the distractions to very busy people?&amp;nbsp; If not, would putting one together be beneficial to avoid reporting (again) what is already known about?&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044391#M45090</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-11T13:06:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commenting on library items</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044392#M45091</link>
      <description>I think the second 'comments from non logged on persons …' message is actually a wording error in the WordPress software. It should say 'the first comment from users is subject to inspection …'. Now that you have had a comment approved you should find subsequent comments go straight through.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Commenting-on-library-items/m-p/1044392#M45091</guid>
      <dc:creator>spraxyt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-11T13:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

