<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again! in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036644#M44299</link>
    <description>As promised elsewhere I said I would put an update today (although a bit later than I initially indicated, fell asleep after my shift on the maintenance last night). &lt;BR /&gt;Apologies in advance, might be a bit of a long one.&lt;BR /&gt;So first off, Kevins 5 questions&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Townman&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1. Zero value tokens on essential products - fix in progress, release forecast Jan 2014&lt;BR /&gt;2. Database token values are wrong&lt;BR /&gt;3. Token values displayed on the referral page do not reflect those in the data base&lt;BR /&gt;4. The product of token values and number of payments in some circumstances do not match the displayed total payment value&lt;BR /&gt;5. Month to month total referral value changes by inexplicable amounts&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) Correct - Still planning on January, but as mentioned previously. Hopefully before christmas.&lt;BR /&gt;2) Yup - These will be the next things to be addressed after the zero value. Nothing difficult, just a tedious task going through and checking them all. I'd say this should probably be done in January as well. As it's a simple fix I might switch to being the developer on those and get somebody else to test.&lt;BR /&gt;3) Yes - Assuming you mean this page - &lt;A href="http://www.plus.net/support/tools/referrals/referrals_discount_info.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.plus.net/support/tools/referrals/referrals_discount_info.shtml&lt;/A&gt; . Currently waiting on our business analysts to confirm what they should all show and something I'm pestering them about daily. Once we have the values it's something that &lt;S&gt;needs to&lt;/S&gt; will be fixed ASAP as we can't have incorrect info on the site.&lt;BR /&gt;4 &amp;amp; 5) Hopefully once the database values are cleaned up this will fix itself. If not we will be able to see clearer what is causing it. At the moment there are that many things going on it's difficult to isolate the cause. Don't have an ETA on this, there will be a period of monitoring after the token values are all fixed to see what happens.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Townman&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;I think you would agree that the issues surrounding referrals is a bigger monster than has been previously perceived and proberly needs some additional tasks scheduling as you hinted previously.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, definitely! The most likely ones to need additional tasks raising will be 4 &amp;amp; 5 mentioned above.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: I&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;I would have a guess that the 0.00 value for the current unlimited plan is only showing on referrals&amp;nbsp; that were done after the (very sneaky change by PN) value change from 75 to 50p? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: David&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Morning Scott/Mike,&lt;BR /&gt;This was the unlimited broadband and the lady who took it out is still on the same package, as I set it up for her, and help her with her computer fairly regularly. She hasn't changed from her original package, I appreciate if she does it would drop to 50p.&lt;BR /&gt;Phil in support applied a credit to my account, the ticket ref is #72853538 as the value for this was always 0.0p instead of 75p.&lt;BR /&gt;I'd be a bit miffed if it wasn't reapplied at 75p once the referrals problem is sorted as this error was at PN's end.&lt;BR /&gt;Mike, the 0.0p value of one of my referrals was a 75p one, this is why I imagine it will be reinstated at 50p once they fix the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;The line moved over to PN on the 21/6/13 and unlimited broadband was still paying 75p at this time.&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;David&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Lumping these two together as they are both related to the 50p &amp;amp; 75p values for unlimited. This is something I've been having a hunt around and I can't find any documentation internally that refers to us having a change of values from 75p to 50p. The only documentation I can find relates to unlimited being a 75p referral. That isn't to say there wasn't a change, I just can't find any evidence of us doing it intentionally.&lt;BR /&gt;I've queried this with the business analysts and I'm awaiting a reply on what the value should be and what it should say on the website (as per number 3 above). It's something I keep chasing daily as it's the main thing currently blocking our work on referrals. My gut feeling is that somebody has updated the referrals page and copy and pasted a wrong value in and it should say 75p, all the information so far seems to support that theory. Just need confirmation from the BAs.&lt;BR /&gt;As I side note, if it was meant to be 75p all along and never changed (despite what the site says), it makes our clean-up a bit easier as we don't have to deal with token values changing before/after a certain date. Which brings us nicely on to....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Townman&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Scott,&lt;BR /&gt;From a business point of view, the above presents an interesting case for your clean-up testing.&amp;nbsp; Will the payment correction scripts detect and adjust for manual correction credits (as noted here by David) or will PN (understandably) consider the cost of doing so to be more than the benefit (to PN), with the consequential bonus to users like David of them getting a double-bubble benefit out of the protracted rectification?&amp;nbsp; Cheesy Grin&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wondered how long before somebody would pick up on this! This is a discussion that has been going on for a while with myself and the developer.&lt;BR /&gt;In all honesty, it looks like there won't be a way of us sorting out who has had a manual refund by CSC and who hasn't. There isn't anything to say that it was specifically a refund done for unpaid referrals. The only thing we could go off would be looking for accounts affected by the token issue and have a manual refund in the past X months that is a multiple of 75p.&lt;BR /&gt;If that brought back a reasonable number (for arguments sake, lets say 10), we would be able to go through them manually so there wasn't a double-bubble benefit. If it brought back an unreasonable number (again, for arguments sake, lets say 1000) we would need to figure out a way that we could automate the process.&lt;BR /&gt;Realistically, it's probably going to be a double-bubble benefit. It will probably be cheaper to do that than it would cost in development to make sure people weren't credited twice. We just need to get a rough indication of how many are affected by that and get the appropriate people to give it the OK.&lt;BR /&gt;Finally, anything that I've missed off or not made clear?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ScottStorey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-14T21:13:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036568#M44223</link>
      <description>Ref ticket 75086245&lt;BR /&gt;For quite sometime I have notice and reported that the total of referral discount applied to my account does not match the sum of the listed tokens. &amp;nbsp;As this ticket (and previous) show I have been given various explanations of why I'm wrong in my assessment, however the final response last month confirmed that there is a known problem affecting my referral tokens which "is being worked on".&lt;BR /&gt;This month my reported referral value has changed yet again by an amount not equal to any referral token value. &amp;nbsp;Therefore if the system is functioning correctly, that change cannot be the consequence of a change in status of one of my referred accounts. &amp;nbsp;Also from the referral value list, there are two PN Essentials having a token value of £0.00.&lt;BR /&gt;The ticket concluded that my correct referral value is £6.60, but the value credited this month is an odd number less which is not a multiple of 25p, that being the &amp;nbsp;smallest token value. &amp;nbsp;Just how does the system end up with a referral value of £x.x7 when referral token values are multiples of 25p?&lt;BR /&gt;What is the status of the fix referred to in ticket 75086245 please?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036568#M44223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-28T08:13:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036569#M44224</link>
      <description>Hi Kevin,&lt;BR /&gt;I've just taken a look at the problem that referenced on the ticket you've referred to. I can see the problem is still currently open and is still with our Development Team. I'm sorry that it's causing you such a headache. We're aware it's affecting a number of customers and we'll get this issue resolved ASAP.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036569#M44224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pettitto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-28T09:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036570#M44225</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;Good to catch up with you again... thank you for the prompt reply.&lt;BR /&gt;Not really causing me a headache - I have a life - it s a matter that there is a persisting inconsistent known fault.&lt;BR /&gt;The figure seems to strangely change each month by an illogical value - at least previously it was consistently wrong. &amp;nbsp;PN then need to charge me 30p or 52p by direct debit, the processing cost of which is more than PN gets. &amp;nbsp;Also for anyone with a transactional charged bank account (not me on my residential account, though it would apply if this were happening in respect of my business account), the transaction charge could be greater than the amount being charged.&lt;BR /&gt;Spread across a lot of customers, the bank transaction costs to PN could be a lot more than is being collected, which impacts the bottom line! &amp;nbsp;Is there an estimated date for the fix please?&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036570#M44225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-28T09:32:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036571#M44226</link>
      <description>Thanks for getting back to me Kevin,&lt;BR /&gt;It's good to hear from you too - just like old times &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@104CD63F9302A50EF5EC70FE32BB8AA1/images/emoticons/smiley.gif" alt="Smiley" title="Smiley" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've had a chat with one of the QA Engineers and they are currently looking at the problem as we speak. Once we have a bit more information on the scale of the problem and what size of work we are looking at to resolve this issue, I'll certainly let you know.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036571#M44226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pettitto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-28T10:00:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036572#M44227</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;What did the QA engineer (tester?) find &amp;nbsp;on the 28th &lt;S&gt;sat&lt;/S&gt; last month?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any news please?&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036572#M44227</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-08T10:34:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036573#M44228</link>
      <description>Hi Kevin,&lt;BR /&gt;One of the QA guys will be along shortly to pop you an update on this thread.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036573#M44228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pettitto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-08T11:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036574#M44229</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is one that is currently actively being worked on by the development team I'm part of. We do realise how long the problem with referrals has gone on is not good enough.&lt;BR /&gt;We think we have the root cause bottomed out and should be in a position to have the fix tested to confirm it is all good (and doesn't break anything else!) next week. I do realise the update is quite often "next week" but it really is.&lt;BR /&gt;I'll be along Thursday next week to give an update on how it has all again.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036574#M44229</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottStorey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-08T12:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036575#M44230</link>
      <description>Scott,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for finding the time to respond.&amp;nbsp; This is the first response I've seen on this matter which clearly suggests progress and a target for resolution - this is most refreshing.&amp;nbsp; For too long the answer has been "we are looking at it" with no indication of by when a fix might be provided.&amp;nbsp; I realise that when next week comes along, it is possible that the problem will have been found to be even more complex than you think it is today.&amp;nbsp; That is the nature of complex IT systems which have evolved over a number of years, often to do things they were never originally designed to handle.&amp;nbsp; That said the delay in doing something is as you suggest, not good enough.&lt;BR /&gt;I look forward to receiving your update next Thursday - I will look out for that response!&lt;BR /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036575#M44230</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-08T12:57:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036576#M44231</link>
      <description>I'm looking forward to it being fixed and the referrals paid with 10% interest&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@13ACAF1B4DB3038AD540E11CDD6AB984/images/emoticons/cheesy.gif" alt="Cheesy" title="Cheesy" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036576#M44231</guid>
      <dc:creator>reserved</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-08T15:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036577#M44232</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Scott&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;The problem is one that is currently actively being worked on by the development team I'm part of. We do realise how long the problem with referrals has gone on is not good enough.&lt;BR /&gt;We think we have the root cause bottomed out and should be in a position to have the fix tested to confirm it is all good (and doesn't break anything else!) next week. I do realise the update is quite often "next week" but it really is.&lt;BR /&gt;I'll be along Thursday next week to give an update on how it has all again.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color:blue;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's Thursday&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036577#M44232</guid>
      <dc:creator>reserved</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T10:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036578#M44233</link>
      <description>You will get an update at some point today, Scott is a little busy at the moment but will get you an update today.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036578#M44233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pettitto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T11:01:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036579#M44234</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: reserved&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color:blue;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;It's Thursday&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It sure is, but give the guy a chance, it was only 90 minutes into the working day before you rattled their cage.&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@13ACAF1B4DB3038AD540E11CDD6AB984/images/emoticons/cheesy.gif" alt="Cheesy" title="Cheesy" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You might at least let them get through lunch first...&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@DD2C576E9659EC19DB321D3F15B5069C/images/emoticons/grin.gif" alt="Grin" title="Grin" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036579#M44234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T11:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036580#M44235</link>
      <description>I expect he has finished his lunch by now.&lt;BR /&gt;Anybody want a wager that the reply (if it comes) will be along the lines of "We are still working on it" ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:11:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036580#M44235</guid>
      <dc:creator>gofaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T15:11:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036581#M44236</link>
      <description>There's no update yet regarding this being resolved, it is still being worked on and is towards the top in terms of priority of problems to get resolved, unfortunately there are a few things currently above this.&lt;BR /&gt;It will be going in a batch of fixes that we will be releasing in December at the latest, but if we can get this pushed through sooner we will.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036581#M44236</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrispurvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T15:33:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036582#M44237</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;As Chris mentioned I'm rather busy at the moment (currently actually sat at my sisters graduation).&lt;BR /&gt;We aren't as far along as I expected we would be. My team picks up nearly all live issues and we had to fix the recent problems people reported with recent calls not showing as a priority.&lt;BR /&gt;Having said that, we have moved forward. Myself and the developer responsible for the fix sat down earlier in the week and confirmed the cause of the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;As other Chris has mentioned we want it fixed sooner rather than later and it looks like we will split the fix in two. First part to fix the actual problem so all future referrals are done correctly and the second part to clean up the referrals that have been missed. The reason for this is that it gives me time to confirm that the cleanup gives everyone the refunds they are owed and get a fix out as quick as possible for future referrals.&lt;BR /&gt;Behind the scenes we are also working on a better way of prioritising existing problems so there isn't a situation like we had with this where the response you would often hear is either "we are working on it" or "it will be fixed, but we don't know when."</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036582#M44237</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottStorey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T15:42:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036583#M44238</link>
      <description>Scott,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for fulfilling your commitment to provided an update of progress by today, even though you are out of the office doing once in a lifetime family stuff. &amp;nbsp;Congratulations to your sister.&lt;BR /&gt;A two part solution sounds like a plan - fix the cause first, then tidy up the historical consequences. &amp;nbsp;When you are back in the office, would it be possible to be given target dates for each phase please. &amp;nbsp;One understands that live service delivery issues will always need to come first, but a target would be good to have.&lt;BR /&gt;If I might ask, does the fix deliver correction to the listed token values and the totalling of the same? &amp;nbsp;Will the correction of historical payments take into consideration referred accounts which have now terminated? &amp;nbsp;Do you have a date from which the model was known to be broken please? &amp;nbsp;Personally I have never found a good correlation between listed tokens and the received referral discount value. &amp;nbsp;Since I have been on LSR (monthly subscription is less than the referral value) the "visible" referral value as been "capped" to the subscription value.&lt;BR /&gt;I guess it would be useful to learn of the scope of the fix, so that those of us who have concerns over referrals (I do not think there is just one issue) could indicate if there is anything else outside of the scope of planned fixes.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036583#M44238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T17:42:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036584#M44239</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: Chris&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;It will be going in a batch of fixes that we will be releasing in December at the latest&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am willing to wager my entire Decembers referral value on this not happening - any takers?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036584#M44239</guid>
      <dc:creator>gofaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-15T10:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036585#M44240</link>
      <description>I am quite confident that a fix isn't too far away on this one, as Scott has mentioned.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036585#M44240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pettitto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-15T11:55:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036586#M44241</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: gofaster&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am willing to wager my entire Decembers referral value on this not happening - any takers?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think I am with you on this one but I have to say that I don't think its a lack of effort from the PN staff though&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@C99FFF55540079D701B20BB503070F3D/images/emoticons/cool.gif" alt="Cool" title="Cool" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036586#M44241</guid>
      <dc:creator>BRABUS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-21T16:23:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Referral discount calculation changed yet again!</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036587#M44242</link>
      <description>: &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt; I don't think &lt;I&gt;this&lt;/I&gt; one can be blamed on "our suppliers"&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@60D8B9A7EF595F957F721D893E7B8359/images/emoticons/crazy2.gif" alt="Crazy" title="Crazy" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Referral-discount-calculation-changed-yet-again/m-p/1036587#M44242</guid>
      <dc:creator>gofaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-21T17:15:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

