<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PN absorbed into BT? in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924767#M34589</link>
    <description>mod:note&lt;BR /&gt;Locked in favour of existing thread in Bob's post.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dvorak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-14T07:40:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PN absorbed into BT?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924765#M34587</link>
      <description>I have today received an e-mail from BT about PN's Home Phone price rises.&lt;BR /&gt;Does this indicate that PN is slowly being absorbed into BT (who own PN, if I understand rightly)?&lt;BR /&gt;I had a bellyful of BT's rotten service some years back, which is why I moved to PN (who have proven infinitely better). If such a merger ever does take place, the day I learn of it is the one I shall be looking for another provider.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924765#M34587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Petard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T07:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E-mail from BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924766#M34588</link>
      <description>No it doesn't mean that, have a look &lt;A href="http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,107655.0/topicseen.html" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:35:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924766#M34588</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T07:35:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN absorbed into BT?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924767#M34589</link>
      <description>mod:note&lt;BR /&gt;Locked in favour of existing thread in Bob's post.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/PN-absorbed-into-BT/m-p/924767#M34589</guid>
      <dc:creator>dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-14T07:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

