<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: can we trust VMBU figures? in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842750#M28889</link>
    <description>So that implies the records were lost or unaccounted for, at the time that '&lt;B&gt;pierre_pierre &lt;/B&gt;' is interested in ?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:38:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842747#M28886</link>
      <description>yesterday I did some downloads between 0600 and 0700 and I know that the NetWorx figure are pretty accurate at 72Mb but VMBU has only shown&amp;nbsp; 42Kb that is a big difference&lt;BR /&gt;Current billing period: Oct 24 2011 - Nov 23 2011&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 	24 Mon 	25 Tue 	26 Wed 	27 Thu 	28 Fri 	29 Sat 	30 Sun 	Total&lt;BR /&gt;Allowance Used 	130.3MB 	124.52MB 	87.36MB 	91.41MB 	10.25MB 	- 	- 	443.84MB&lt;BR /&gt;Overnight Usage 	2.52MB 	18.97MB 	47.67MB 	&lt;B&gt;41.86KB &lt;/B&gt;	334.01KB 	- 	- 	69.54MB&lt;BR /&gt;Total 	132.82MB 	143.49MB 	135.03MB 	91.46MB 	10.59MB 	- 	- 	513.38MB</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842747#M28886</guid>
      <dc:creator>pierre_pierre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:09:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842748#M28887</link>
      <description>Can you give us some more readings from VMBU so we can compare them to the networx screengrab that you've provided? I'd be interested to see if you're seeing this happen during other times too.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842748#M28887</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842749#M28888</link>
      <description>PP&lt;BR /&gt;This is for the 27th&lt;BR /&gt;Hour	Upload (MB)	Downloaded (MB)&lt;BR /&gt;0	0.0039	0.0055&lt;BR /&gt;1	0.0041	0.0050&lt;BR /&gt;2	0.0041	0.0056&lt;BR /&gt;3	0.0041	0.0064&lt;BR /&gt;4	0.0013	0.0019&lt;BR /&gt;8	0.0018	0.0022&lt;BR /&gt;9	0.0039	0.0048</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842749#M28888</guid>
      <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:30:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842750#M28889</link>
      <description>So that implies the records were lost or unaccounted for, at the time that '&lt;B&gt;pierre_pierre &lt;/B&gt;' is interested in ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842750#M28889</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:38:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842751#M28890</link>
      <description>didnt get up so early this morning, but this is the 27th figures, and as Puliegh says, James has no records for 6 an7 oclock&lt;BR /&gt;My download was the Win7 update over 60 M plus others , it could be that it does a reboot during this time and PN looses it?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842751#M28890</guid>
      <dc:creator>pierre_pierre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T08:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842752#M28891</link>
      <description>Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;There was some usage lag that night which could account for the lack of data there. Usually it just means a delay in the data reporting which could be why that's happened.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842752#M28891</guid>
      <dc:creator>orbrey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T13:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842753#M28892</link>
      <description>Has the "delay in the data reporting" caught up yet ? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@0D61218B4C14ADFBC10BECD1C628E66A/images/emoticons/undecided.gif" alt="Undecided" title="Undecided" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you have the missing data that '&lt;B&gt;pierre_pierre&lt;/B&gt;' was interested in ? &amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842753#M28892</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-29T21:40:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: can we trust VMBU figures?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842754#M28893</link>
      <description>no it hasnt caught up.&amp;nbsp; had some thoughts as above.&lt;BR /&gt;I am on the SamKnows monitor and had a&amp;nbsp; problem with their router, got the new one yesterday and that recorded 42 M last night, my usage is OK, but it does take a chunk out of my 10G allowance and doesnt show on NetWorx</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:06:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/can-we-trust-VMBU-figures/m-p/842754#M28893</guid>
      <dc:creator>pierre_pierre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-30T07:06:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

