<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Plusnet interface with BT in Plusnet Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748953#M20642</link>
    <description>So far so good here, and my son-i-l, who lives&amp;nbsp; in my area had no problem in getting a lanline problem solved.&lt;BR /&gt;Makes me wonder if PN have plotted the faults being moaned about to see if they are more prevalent in particular regions.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Luzern</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-10T17:13:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Plusnet interface with BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748953#M20642</link>
      <description>So far so good here, and my son-i-l, who lives&amp;nbsp; in my area had no problem in getting a lanline problem solved.&lt;BR /&gt;Makes me wonder if PN have plotted the faults being moaned about to see if they are more prevalent in particular regions.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748953#M20642</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luzern</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-10T17:13:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Plusnet interface with BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748954#M20643</link>
      <description>Hi lucerne, &lt;BR /&gt;Cheers for your feedback. Checking the impact of faults is something that's done as an ongoing practice as sometimes we need to make BT aware that there is an MSO (major service outage, a loss of service affecting a large group of users) in a particular area. &lt;BR /&gt;Data protection does mean that we can't publicly announce where faults are occurring but I would go as far to say that it would be hard to draw any useful conclusions by looking at that kind of information anyway as the nature of faults means that they tend to occur sporadically rather than reappear repeatedly in the same area.&lt;BR /&gt;Adam&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748954#M20643</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-13T13:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Plusnet interface with BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748955#M20644</link>
      <description>Thanks, but to clarify, I was meaning that if bad service on faults is particularly evident in certain BT regions, sub regions etc, it may need high0lighting as such, rather than say discrete bad service or incompetences.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:13:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748955#M20644</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luzern</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-14T08:13:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Plusnet interface with BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748956#M20645</link>
      <description>Thanks lucerne, &lt;BR /&gt;I know what your saying, this does actually get flagged with our suppliers as processes are in place to record repeat faults and MSOs/common faults. So our suppliers do have the data and we highlight such issues where we can. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748956#M20645</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-14T08:25:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Plusnet interface with BT</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748957#M20646</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: _Adam_Walker_&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Data protection does mean that we can't publicly announce where faults are occurring&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Data Protection (as in the Data Protection Act) would prevent you from releasing personal details - it wouldn't stop you from&amp;nbsp; giving say, a number of faults reported per exchange, or per group of postcode areas if you wanted to.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm sure you don't release the figures for commercial reasons (like you don't want another supplier to see that they have less faults, as they could use that info in an advertising campaign - for example).&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/Plusnet-interface-with-BT/m-p/748957#M20646</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lurker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-14T11:57:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

