<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: blocking scam calls in Home Phone</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1997895#M40649</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background: var(--ck-color-mention-background); color: var(--ck-color-mention-text);"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1110"&gt;@MisterW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Fair point, I would presume so as well, however, it would be useful to know for sure on our end so that we can provide the support or reassurance required by the situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:38:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tina11192</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-05T14:38:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976263#M39679</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to block calls which:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;• show a calling number on 1471 (or on your 'phone if you've got one that shows CLI), but&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;•&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;do&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;NOT&lt;/EM&gt; show a number ("from an unknown number") on 1572 option 1?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know some callers - such as hospitals, doctor's surgeries, etc. - withhold their number; that's fair enough, but those show as number withhheld or similar on 1471.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If not, why not? I'd say well over 95% of the scam calls I get match the above.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(I usually press 1 or 2, then when I get a human say "while we're tracing the number, I'd like to ask you some questions about your scam operation". They usually hang up at about "ask".)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976263#M39679</guid>
      <dc:creator>G6JPG-0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-03T13:39:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976276#M39680</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133515"&gt;@G6JPG-0&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I sympathise with what you're trying to achieve, as I used to be plagued by up to FIFTY scam calls every day before I got a &lt;A href="https://www.cprcallblocker.com/" target="_self"&gt;CPR Call Blocker&lt;/A&gt; (£15 on eBay).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER I would question why are you looking for a solution now ? - when you'll be forced to convert your PSTN landline to VoIP probably within 12 months.&amp;nbsp; Blocking unwanted calls on VoIP is likely to require a completely different fix depending on what phone system you have or intend to get.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FWIW, since I ported my BT landline number to A&amp;amp;A VoIP, the scam calls have dropped to maybe 2 or 3 a week.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't understand why it's now less, as the phone number is unchanged, A&amp;amp;A don't appear to block anything on VoIP, and my call blocker is removed (as it worked in-line on the Openreach phone cable).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976276#M39680</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anunnaki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-03T15:47:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976315#M39683</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have had this issue. I now have a BT Truecall phone which you can either block the calls or send them to answerphone. We have known people "whitelisted" and "anonymous" send to answerphone. Unknown numbers are answered before the phone rings and the caller has to leave their name followed by pressing the # key before they come through. All this is on Andrews and Arnold VOIP&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 18:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976315#M39683</guid>
      <dc:creator>iannewson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-03T18:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976379#M39684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would that CPR call blocker block the type of call I specified (faked CLI) but let through others (real CLI and withheld CLI)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, I'm aware of the POTS switchoff, and will be looking into VOIP before too long. But I've actually thought the telecommunications companies between then should have been able to block the type of call I described - fake CLI that 1572 knows is fake - for some years.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interesting that VoIP (a) cuts down the number of such calls (b) doesn't stop them altogether.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976379#M39684</guid>
      <dc:creator>G6JPG-0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-04T08:09:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976393#M39685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd previously heard of &lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STIR/SHAKEN" target="_self"&gt;STIR/SHAKEN&lt;/A&gt; but hadn't kept up with progress on implementing it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, a quick Google brings up plenty of results (which I've not had time to read).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;e.g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/" target="_blank"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/" target="_blank"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976393#M39685</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobPN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-04T08:27:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976467#M39705</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133515"&gt;@G6JPG-0&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;CPR call blockers are powered by the PSTN line. This has caused me a problem in the past as if you have a fault this can be detected as an impedance fault, confusing the issue. &lt;BR /&gt;BT TrueCall call blocking phones effectively stop spammers’ autodiallers getting through. As a result I have not had one spam call since swapping to one of these at least 5 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976467#M39705</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baldrick1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-04T16:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976517#M39707</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Trouble with TrueCall and similar is that they force genuine (but unknown to me) callers to go through a process. Sure, it may stop scam calls, but it might stop some genuine - but time-strapped, or not very techy - callers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if there was a way of stopping specifically, and only, the type of call I described: they &lt;EM&gt;do&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;show a CLI, but 1572 knows it is fake. It would need to be something PlusNet implemented, as it needs information only their equipment has. I very much doubt there is, and PN (and others) won't be interested in adding one with the impending demise of the POTS, but just wondered if there&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;was&lt;/EM&gt; something and I just hadn't found it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976517#M39707</guid>
      <dc:creator>G6JPG-0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-05T09:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976533#M39708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133515"&gt;@G6JPG-0&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; here are &lt;A href="https://www.revk.uk/2018/05/junk-calls-what-can-we-do-in-a.html" target="_self"&gt;some ramblings regarding junk calls on VoIP&lt;/A&gt; from "&lt;STRONG&gt;RevK&lt;/STRONG&gt;" (AKA Adrian Kennard - Director of A&amp;amp;A)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No definitive answer, and the comments below are interesting, but at least someone is thinking about technical solutions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 10:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976533#M39708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anunnaki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-05T10:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976632#M39710</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, interesting. Though nobody there described the sort of call I described (so I've added a post).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976632#M39710</guid>
      <dc:creator>G6JPG-0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-06T07:39:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976676#M39722</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/22010"&gt;@RobPN&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd previously heard of &lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STIR/SHAKEN" target="_self"&gt;STIR/SHAKEN&lt;/A&gt; but hadn't kept up with progress on implementing it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, a quick Google brings up plenty of results (which I've not had time to read).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;e.g.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's what I call fighting talk!&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:"&gt;😃&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AFAIAC, this is all a solution without a problem. Why? Well, keeping it &lt;EM&gt;very&lt;/EM&gt; simple: &lt;EM&gt;I don't get scam phone calls&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why not I do not know. Just another of life's many mysteries...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 16:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976676#M39722</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-06T16:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976719#M39725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/uk-rejects-stir-shaken-us-plan-to-control-global-caller-id-now-dead/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer"&gt;https://commsrisk.com/yet-more-disinformation-spread-about-stir-shaken-and-the-uk/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;That's what I call fighting talk!&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@B77887557F103AD57BE85E274B7303FC/emoticons/1f603.png" border="0" alt=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:" /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AFAIAC, this is all a solution without a problem. Why? Well, keeping it&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;very&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;simple:&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;I don't get scam phone calls&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Why not I do not know. Just another of life's many mysteries...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, the commsrisk editor does seem to be very against STIR/SHAKEN! (Justifiably so, if it's just a moneymaking scheme the scammers can pay to get round.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This, and others, is most definitely not a solution without a problem - you must be a member of a very small club that don't get scam calls! Mine varies - I get days with none; I think I've had up to six. I think I've read of people who have had 30 in a day. So it's not a problem&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;for you&lt;/EM&gt; - but it most definitely is for many of us! (Well, for me, not&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;that&lt;/EM&gt; much of a&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;problem&lt;/EM&gt;, more just an irritant. But for some, especially the gullible, it&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;is&lt;/EM&gt; a problem.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 09:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976719#M39725</guid>
      <dc:creator>G6JPG-0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-07T09:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976724#M39726</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133515"&gt;@G6JPG-0&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think I've read of people who have had 30 in a day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For me when still on BT landline, 30 unsolicited SPAM calls was a typical day, my worst single day record was 49.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fortunately my call blocker prevented the phone ringing 99% of the time, but could see the quantity in the daily call log.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 10:28:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1976724#M39726</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anunnaki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-07T10:28:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992234#M40372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using a BT cordless with integrated TrueCall. I've now migrated to VOIP with Andrews and Arnold (highly recommended - landline bill now between £1 and £2 per month) using a Grandstream adapter plugged into the back of the router, and the phone plugged into that. Call blocking works better than when on the copper pair as CLID is much more reliable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The effectiveness of the call blocker depends on the user: unknown callers or those who withhold their CLID have to give their name, and I have to choose to accept their call. Most scammers just ring off and I never hear the phone ring, but the odd one does try to bluff it "Hi, it's Andrea from the Green Homes Scheme" or "It's Mike" - you've got to be confident and put the phone down. Frequently, of course, the withheld calls says "Doctor" or "Assistant to Mr xxxxx at the hospital", so the good calls do get through and I'm not aware of any genuine caller being turned away.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 16:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992234#M40372</guid>
      <dc:creator>orrery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-01T16:40:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992283#M40376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133515"&gt;@G6JPG-0&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;From what I read, 1572 is a system based on "known felons" in some way, I'm guessing from people flagging the numbers as bad is one way. BT could also be clever, and do a check against "non-allocated numbers", and other such things.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Such a system (a) costs &amp;amp; takes time to 'educate'; and (b) is only as good as the data they use... A third party solution would need to do something similar.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(This is very similar to Geolocation of IP addresses: if, for example, a sports site as it thinks you're not in UK, then their geolocation data is bad or not up to date... There's many lists out there, you get what you pay for!)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you ever get false positives? Or does your 'whitelist' generally stop that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:19:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992283#M40376</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_blitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-02T14:19:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992307#M40377</link>
      <description>There are a whole set of Ofcom general conditions which all telecoms providers fail to implement.  There is a requirement that the presented CLI should be a valid dialable number.  So many of the presented CLI numbers associated with scans are undialavle / invalid.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All calls carry an originating CLI which might not be the Dane as the display (presented) CLI.  These ought to raise alarm bells.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 20:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992307#M40377</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-02T20:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992328#M40382</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/39167"&gt;@paul_blitz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you ever get false positives? Or does your 'whitelist' generally stop that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not that I know of. My familiy used to moan a lot when CLID didn't work, as they had to go through the screening process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 10:10:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992328#M40382</guid>
      <dc:creator>orrery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T10:10:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992329#M40383</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;All calls carry an originating CLI which might not be the Dane as the display (presented) CLI. These ought to raise alarm bells.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many genuine companies set up their systems so that any call presents the main switchboard number rather than the direct dial the call is made from, so that would create issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 10:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992329#M40383</guid>
      <dc:creator>orrery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T10:12:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992337#M40385</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1502"&gt;@orrery&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:
&lt;P class="1733222853548"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;SPAN&gt;Many genuine companies set up their systems so that any call presents the main switchboard number rather than the direct dial the call is made from, so that would create issues.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No issues at all.&amp;nbsp; The requirement is that the presented (displayed) CLI be a valid dialable number.&amp;nbsp; The presented CLI and the calling CLI being different should be a trigger for double checking that the presented CLI is a valid dialable number.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Given that this is an Ofcom requirement ... it is clearly not seen as an issue in the described circumstances.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/phone-numbers/guidelines-for-cli-facilities/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Statement: Guidelines for Calling Line Identification Facilities - Ofcom&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;"...&lt;SPAN&gt;we introduced a new General Condition (GC) C6 which requires Communications Providers (CPs) to provide CLI facilities, and ensure that the CLI Data provided with a call includes a valid, dialable telephone number which uniquely identifies the caller&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The detail in the referenced PDF is very interesting too...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;C6.2 Regulated Providers must provide Calling Line Identification Facilities, and enable them by default, unless they can demonstrate that it is not technically feasible or economically viable to do so.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;C6.3 Regulated Providers must inform Subscribers if Calling Line Identification Facilities are not available on the service they are providing to those Subscribers.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;C6.4 When providing Calling Line Identification Facilities, Regulated Providers must:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;(a) ensure, so far as technically feasible, that any CLI Data provided with and/or associated with a call includes a valid, dialable Telephone Number which uniquely identifies the caller; and&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;(b) respect the privacy choices of End-Users.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;C6.5 Regulated Providers must not charge Subscribers any additional or separate fee for access to or use of standard Calling Line Identification Facilities.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;C6.6 Where technically feasible, Regulated Providers must:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;(a) take all reasonable steps to identify calls in relation to which invalid or non-dialable CLI Data is provided; and&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;(b) prevent those calls from being connected to the called party, where such calls are identified.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is quite evident that many CPs are failing to comply with GC C6 in full which has been a requirement since October 2018.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1992337#M40385</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T11:16:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1997889#M40645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/scam-calls-and-messages/new-blocking-requirements-to-protect-consumers-from-scam-calls-from-abroad/" target="_self"&gt;This&lt;/A&gt; may be relevant - as of last week OFCOM say "Phone providers must now all block calls from abroad which imitate UK landline numbers, under strengthened industry guidance". ie no number spoofing to look like a UK landline or mobile.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps Plusnet could confirm they have implemented the block?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:26:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1997889#M40645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stoker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-05T13:26:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: blocking scam calls</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1997893#M40647</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN style="background: var(--ck-color-mention-background); color: var(--ck-color-mention-text);"&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/19274"&gt;@Stoker&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; thank you for getting in touch with us and for flagging this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've requested some more information from management in regards to what measures are being put in place to reflect the new guidance from Ofcom, and as soon as I have more details I will be updating this topic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Home-Phone/blocking-scam-calls/m-p/1997893#M40647</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tina11192</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-05T13:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

