<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6 in IPv6 Trial</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050623#M1943</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Merry Christmas to you.&lt;BR /&gt;Last time I checked, no the DPI equipment needs a minor software update to enable the IPv6 functionality.&amp;nbsp; Its possible the packet marking is enabled however the full prioritisation and then VMBU tracking will take longer.&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paulmh5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-24T20:27:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050622#M1942</link>
      <description>Merry Christmas!&lt;BR /&gt;Plusnet team,&lt;BR /&gt;Can you confirm if traffic prioritisation and usage reporting is functional for IPv6 traffic?&lt;BR /&gt;I've noticed that the usage figures reported under the IPv6 test account are lower than those recorded by my router.&amp;nbsp; The difference is pretty big, which would make sense if it's down to IPv6 since I'm streaming from Netflix over IPv6.&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050622#M1942</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougMa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-24T15:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050623#M1943</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Merry Christmas to you.&lt;BR /&gt;Last time I checked, no the DPI equipment needs a minor software update to enable the IPv6 functionality.&amp;nbsp; Its possible the packet marking is enabled however the full prioritisation and then VMBU tracking will take longer.&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050623#M1943</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulmh5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-24T20:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050624#M1944</link>
      <description>Interesting Suprised the usage tracking isn't based on the radius session for the PPP&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@D10385D46FF09B2E8FF20B0746B65E6F/images/emoticons/shocked.gif" alt="Shocked" title="Shocked" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050624#M1944</guid>
      <dc:creator>dragon2611</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-31T09:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050625#M1945</link>
      <description>Given each and every byte goes through DPI easier to just have that counting the traffic rather than running interim accounting in addition to the DPI I guess.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 22:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050625#M1945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melancholie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-03T22:46:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050626#M1946</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;We do use RADIUS accounting packets for some monitoring of data but not to the levels you are talking about.&amp;nbsp; The VMBU page is generated from the DPI data as it needs to be split into different traffic types.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050626#M1946</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulmh5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-04T15:57:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Traffic prioritisation and usage monitoring for IPv6</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050627#M1947</link>
      <description>Ah fair enough, my account just shows peak vs offpeak usage but with no breakdown of traffic type.&lt;BR /&gt;dick:quote</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/Traffic-prioritisation-and-usage-monitoring-for-IPv6/m-p/1050627#M1947</guid>
      <dc:creator>dragon2611</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-04T19:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

