<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPv6 with Fritz!Box 7390 on FTTC in IPv6 Trial</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045302#M1893</link>
    <description>Hi w23,&lt;BR /&gt;I have observed the same; as a result I've always monitored either IPv6 or IPv4, never both at the same time. &amp;nbsp;I've also found that IPv4 monitoring always shows a % packet loss: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share-thumb/c90ac0db6fbbf0bb058b9f14c3692647-14-12-2013.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I used IPv4 monitoring when using an HE tunnel for IPv6 because my priority was monitoring the WAN link rather than the WAN link plus tunnel. &amp;nbsp;Now I'm running native IPv6, I prefer to use that for monitoring since it doesn't exhibit the same % packet loss as the IPv4 monitoring.&lt;BR /&gt;My guess is that WAN ping responses over IPv4 are given such a low priority that they are dropped rather than added to the output queue behind any "production" traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;Edit: I just ran a continuous IPv4 ping to test, and you can see the effect on the live monitor in my previous post: significant packet loss for the IPv6 monitor.&amp;nbsp; I am convinced this is a Fritz implementation side effect rather than any issue with Plusnet's IPv6 support.&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DougMa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-18T11:52:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPv6 with Fritz!Box 7390 on FTTC</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045300#M1891</link>
      <description>Environment: I'm using the Openreach ECI NTE connecting to a Fritz!Box 7390.&amp;nbsp; I was previously using the Fritz VDSL2 modem directly, but after months at a stable 40Mbps after switching to the Fritz I discovered that DLM slowly reduced the line speed down to 22Mbps.&amp;nbsp; Since switching back to the ECI my speed has begun to increase again!&lt;BR /&gt;Configuring IPv6 on the Fritz is trivial, just head to the IPv6 tab and enable it!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r790/DougManton/FritzIPv6Config_zps3b2856fd.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;After a PPP reconnect, the status shows the allocation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r790/DougManton/FritzIPv6Stats_zps864a4b4f.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Fritz defaults to blocking inbound IPv6, but it is easy to selectively enable access to hosts for full-access or limited to specific protocols/ports:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r790/DougManton/FritzFirewall_zpsd7f8091c.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Fritz keeps track of IPv6 address allocations per-host, including privacy addressing, so there are no problems caused by addresses changing over time:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r790/DougManton/FritzHost_zpsf20388bf.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I added an AAAA record for my iMac, using it's permanent address (not one of the random privacy addresses; that will not accept inbound connections), and I can now access it from anywhere I have IPv6 connectivity.&amp;nbsp; This does mean I am relying on the iMac's firewall (pf) to control access.&lt;BR /&gt;Overall I am very happy.&amp;nbsp; Latency is comparable to IPv4, and based on the ThinkBroadband ping monitor it has been 100% stable since activation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share-thumb/a6107ca687b3eb2eab133261d120a53b.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks to the Plusnet team for the work to make this happen.&amp;nbsp; I am looking-forward to this going fully-live and having this enabled on my personal Plusnet account.&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045300#M1891</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougMa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-18T11:33:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPv6 with Fritz!Box 7390 on FTTC</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045301#M1892</link>
      <description>Hi DougMa,&lt;BR /&gt;I also found the F!B configuration very straightforward but I have one anomaly that you could perhaps check:&lt;BR /&gt;If you set up both IPv4 and IPv6 ping monitors, does the IPv6 one show predominantly lost packets (mostly red) when the IPv4 one is also running?&lt;BR /&gt;Is your ping monitor set up for the Fritz!Box IPv6 address (the one shown in the 'Online Monitor' screen)?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045301#M1892</guid>
      <dc:creator>w23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-18T11:40:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPv6 with Fritz!Box 7390 on FTTC</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045302#M1893</link>
      <description>Hi w23,&lt;BR /&gt;I have observed the same; as a result I've always monitored either IPv6 or IPv4, never both at the same time. &amp;nbsp;I've also found that IPv4 monitoring always shows a % packet loss: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share-thumb/c90ac0db6fbbf0bb058b9f14c3692647-14-12-2013.png" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I used IPv4 monitoring when using an HE tunnel for IPv6 because my priority was monitoring the WAN link rather than the WAN link plus tunnel. &amp;nbsp;Now I'm running native IPv6, I prefer to use that for monitoring since it doesn't exhibit the same % packet loss as the IPv4 monitoring.&lt;BR /&gt;My guess is that WAN ping responses over IPv4 are given such a low priority that they are dropped rather than added to the output queue behind any "production" traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;Edit: I just ran a continuous IPv4 ping to test, and you can see the effect on the live monitor in my previous post: significant packet loss for the IPv6 monitor.&amp;nbsp; I am convinced this is a Fritz implementation side effect rather than any issue with Plusnet's IPv6 support.&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045302#M1893</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougMa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-18T11:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPv6 with Fritz!Box 7390 on FTTC</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045303#M1894</link>
      <description>Thanks for confirming DougMa, I also concluded it was a Fritz!Box issue as it happened on the previous trial (and only seemed to be me at that time).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/IPv6-Trial/IPv6-with-Fritz-Box-7390-on-FTTC/m-p/1045303#M1894</guid>
      <dc:creator>w23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-18T12:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

