<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced in Everything else</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034656#M40516</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; - yes the banner issue when attempting to modify safeguard settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; - for the avoidance of doubt, can you affirm that there’s no transcription error in those server names - otherwise identical URLs with and without ‘ukcore’ seems suspicious.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- I note two IP addresses returned - is one “safeguarding” and the other the site? &amp;nbsp;Is it possible to construct a command which identifies the DNS service instance which provided the response?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AIUI the DNS ‘server’ is in reality a pool of service instances (each with their own database) which creates the possibility of the same ‘server’ delivering variable results … as I’ve seen when tracking a domain migration - the same DNS ‘server’ randomly returning both the old and new IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could such be similarly responsible for the safeguarding DNS delivering inconsistent results … an out of step instance delivering non-safeguarded resolutions? &amp;nbsp;As a diagnostic is it possible to address the DNS instances direct? &amp;nbsp;How many are there?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 07:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-12T07:26:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030275#M40124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've created a separate ticket to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safeguard-not-enforcing-google-safe-search/td-p/2000409" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safeguard-not-enforcing-google-safe-search/td-p/2000409&lt;/A&gt; because it's marked as fixed and so I can't respond to it, but in any case I think the issue is different this time to before.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So for clarity the issue is that SafeSearch isn't force enabled in the various search engines in the way it was about a week ago.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've investigated myself and I've noticed that if I keep re-opening the browser and attempting to search for something dodgy *sometimes* (rarely) safesearch is enforced and other times it isn't.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On a hunch I did some DNS lookups and I can see that sometimes it maps to forcesafesearch.google.com as I want:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resolve-DnsName &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; | Select-Object Name, IPAddress&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name IPAddress&lt;BR /&gt;---- ---------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 2001:4860:4802:32::78&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 216.239.38.120&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And most other times it does not:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resolve-DnsName google.com | Select-Object Name, IPAddress&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name IPAddress&lt;BR /&gt;---- ---------&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 2a00:1450:4009:c04::8b&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 2a00:1450:4009:c04::65&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 2a00:1450:4009:c04::66&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 2a00:1450:4009:c04::71&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.139&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.100&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.102&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.113&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.101&lt;BR /&gt;google.com 142.250.117.138&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would guess that might be an issue with the underlying BT DNS that it isn't doing this consistently, so maybe that will help at making some progress.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;@Townman&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 22:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030275#M40124</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-28T22:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030386#M40140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For stability and reliability I avoid an ISP DNS if it is capable of DNS Content Filtering or performs DNS Redirection or lacks support for DoH / DoT.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Retry the DNS lookups with Google and Cloudflare's Public DNS, see if the results are any better.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) nslookup &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 8.8.8.8&lt;BR /&gt;2) nslookup &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 1.1.1.1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can also check out the lookup over a wider range of Public DNS at : &lt;A href="https://www.nslookup.io/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.nslookup.io/&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 09:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030386#M40140</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilipHeyes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-30T09:42:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030952#M40235</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there anyone looking into this? Until a few weeks ago this was working fine. Nothing has been changed on my end, and yet the SafeSearch feature is not often being force enabled as it was before (very rarely it is force enabled).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 23:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2030952#M40235</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-03T23:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031156#M40256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/107337"&gt;@PhilipHeyes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- using a third party DNS resolver is not going to help here; it would just bypass the Plusnet Safeguard enforcement of Safesearch entirely.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- I had not seen this thread as I was expecting a reply to my post elsewhere.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are your DNS queries&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;definitely&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;hitting the Plusnet/BT servers each time you run them?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps you could confirm by using a command where the DNS server to be used is being explicitly specified? e.g: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup www.google.com 213.120.234.42&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In fact, might be worth trying both of the DNS IP addresses to see if there's any difference between the two?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;213.120.234.38&lt;BR /&gt;213.120.234.42&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031156#M40256</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-05T16:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031183#M40258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- I wasn't able to reply to the other thread for some reason - there is no option to allow me to do so.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are the results I get when I tried your two examples:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nslookup google.com 213.120.234.42&lt;BR /&gt;Server: indnsc92.bt.net&lt;BR /&gt;Address: 213.120.234.42&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Non-authoritative answer:&lt;BR /&gt;Name: google.com&lt;BR /&gt;Addresses: 2a00:1450:4009:c17::8b&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::71&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::65&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::64&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.139&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.113&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.101&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.102&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.138&lt;BR /&gt;142.251.30.100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nslookup google.com 213.120.234.38&lt;BR /&gt;Server: indnsc102.ukcore.bt.net&lt;BR /&gt;Address: 213.120.234.38&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Non-authoritative answer:&lt;BR /&gt;Name: google.com&lt;BR /&gt;Addresses: 2a00:1450:4009:c17::64&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::8a&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::66&lt;BR /&gt;2a00:1450:4009:c17::71&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.101&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.102&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.138&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.100&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.113&lt;BR /&gt;142.250.151.139&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I repeat with the .42 address then sometimes it says&amp;nbsp;indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net and sometimes&amp;nbsp;indnsc92.bt.net but no change otherwise.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031183#M40258</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-04T22:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031253#M40265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- just activated Safeguard on a Plusnet line line and given things a go.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;google.com seems to do as it does for you. Using the &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; subdomain instead is a little more interesting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sometimes does what I'd expect: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup www.google.com 213.120.234.42
Server:  indnsc92.bt.net
Address:  213.120.234.42

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    forcesafesearch.google.com
Addresses:  2001:4860:4802:32::78
          216.239.38.120
Aliases:  www.google.com&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sometimes doesn't: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup www.google.com 213.120.234.42
Server:  indnsc92.bt.net
Address:  213.120.234.42

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    www.google.com
Addresses:  2a00:1450:4009:c0f::93
          2a00:1450:4009:c0f::67
          2a00:1450:4009:c0f::69
          2a00:1450:4009:c0f::68
          216.239.38.120&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's the same if I carry out a lookup against a domain I would expect to be blocked by one of the parental controls categories (dating, in this case): -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One minute blocked: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup tms.eharmony.co.uk 213.120.234.42
Server:  indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net
Address:  213.120.234.42

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    tms.eharmony.co.uk
Address:  81.130.111.239&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The next not: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup tms.eharmony.co.uk 213.120.234.42
Server:  indnsc92.bt.net
Address:  213.120.234.42

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:    tms.eharmony.co.uk
Addresses:  104.21.67.133
           172.67.176.232&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will see what else I can uncover. In the meatime I'd be insterested to hear if you have the same problem with a site that should be blocked by one of the category filters?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:20:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031253#M40265</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-05T16:20:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031271#M40266</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;:&amp;nbsp;you seem to be correct that it also applies to the category domain filters too. I just brought up &lt;SPAN&gt;Chrome&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;attempted to browse to &lt;A href="https://www.eharmony.co.uk/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.eharmony.co.uk/&lt;/A&gt; and then closed it multiple times and most of the time it blocked it, but then occasionally it browsed through to the site itself. I also repeated your experiment and got the same results as you did.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess I hadn't noticed that because it's only when doing an image search that I spotted the original problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 17:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2031271#M40266</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-05T17:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033151#M40433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;just a note to say that I haven't forgotten about this one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033151#M40433</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-22T15:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033174#M40434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I appreciate that Bob - thanks for letting me know!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:55:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033174#M40434</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-22T21:55:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033979#M40453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;at the slight risk of speaking too soon, I reckon we might be in a better place now if you fancy checking things at your side?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 15:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2033979#M40453</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-05T15:52:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034199#M40463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm afraid I still don't see any difference in behaviour (tested against multiple devices).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 10:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034199#M40463</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-07T10:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034329#M40484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- hmm, that's frustrating.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, to be clear - if you run repeated lookups to a domain you expect to be blocked, you sometimes see the&amp;nbsp;81.130.111.239 IP returned and sometimes don't? My testing was consistently returning the 81.130.111.239 IP which is what I would expect. Don't suppose you can provide some examples?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition, try running this a handful of times and make a note of the string that's returned (it will probably be different each time but it would be interesting to see what servers you're hitting): -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup -type=TXT -class=CHAOS id.server 213.120.234.42&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;You're looking for something like '&lt;SPAN&gt;clpnd13-2'.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 11:48:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034329#M40484</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-08T11:48:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034433#M40495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am NOT using safeguarding, but get the following...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;        "chpnd13-1"

DNS request timed out.
    timeout was 2 seconds.
Non-authoritative answer:
id.server       text =

        "chpnd11-4"

        "chpnd15-2"

        "chpnd15-2"

        "chpnd12-3"

        "chpnd11-4"

        "chpnd14-1"

        "chpnd12-3"

        "chpnd15-2"

        "chpnd13-1"

        "chpnd14-1"

        "chpnd12-3"&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does this help any?&amp;nbsp; I chopped out all of the guff (aside from the DNS time out response).&amp;nbsp; Let me know if more detailed querying would help and I'll try to set up some automation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you aware of the incident which is impacting the administration of safeguarding settings?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034433#M40495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-09T13:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034457#M40501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for your info). I ran this in a loop for 2 mins and got the following (the number at the start is the number of times that result came up):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;516 : Server: indnsc92.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd12-3"&lt;BR /&gt;502 : Server: indnsc92.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd15-2"&lt;BR /&gt;486 : Server: indnsc92.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd11-4"&lt;BR /&gt;468 : Server: indnsc92.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd13-1"&lt;BR /&gt;424 : Server: indnsc92.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd14-1"&lt;BR /&gt;120 : Server: indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd15-2"&lt;BR /&gt;109 : Server: indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd13-1"&lt;BR /&gt;108 : Server: indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd14-1"&lt;BR /&gt;100 : Server: indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd11-4"&lt;BR /&gt;83 : Server: indnsc92.ukcore.bt.net Address: 213.120.234.42 id.server text = "chpnd12-3"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 16:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034457#M40501</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-09T16:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034465#M40504</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I performed some more DNS resolving and see examples as follows.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result which seems to correctly redirect to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resolve-DnsName &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; | Select-Object Name, IPAddress&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name IPAddress&lt;BR /&gt;---- ---------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 2001:4860:4802:32::78&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 216.239.38.120&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Result which seems to incorrectly&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;redirect at least for Ipv4 addresses&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resolve-DnsName &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; | Select-Object Name, IPAddress&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name IPAddress&lt;BR /&gt;---- ---------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 2001:4860:4802:32::78&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.147&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.104&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.106&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.99&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.105&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 192.178.223.103&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Resolve-DnsName &lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; | Select-Object Name, IPAddress&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name IPAddress&lt;BR /&gt;---- ---------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 2a00:1450:4009:c0f::63&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 2a00:1450:4009:c0f::6a&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 2a00:1450:4009:c0f::68&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/A&gt; 2a00:1450:4009:c0f::93&lt;BR /&gt;forcesafesearch.google.com 216.239.38.120&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034465#M40504</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-09T17:06:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034536#M40509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- thanks, seems you're hitting the same servers/data centres as me so I'm unsure why I'm not seeing what you are &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:"&gt;🤔&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With the lookups, could you modify the command to specify the DNS server address so we know for sure that's what it's hitting (or just use the nslookup command I suggested)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- no, not aware. Is it the error banner that pops when modifying settings? I was seeing that myself when trying to replicate this issue and assumed it was something specific to my account.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034536#M40509</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-10T15:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034544#M40510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Bob,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my first response I was using the same command you specified to capture them:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;"nslookup -type=TXT -class=CHAOS id.server 213.120.234.42"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is that okay or do you want me to try something else?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 18:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034544#M40510</guid>
      <dc:creator>CuriousSideny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-10T18:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034545#M40511</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know if it's relevant but I've seen some really weird Safesearch behaviour in recent weeks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In Google searches I would notice that it had been turned on and that there was a message saying I couldn't turn it off as it was enforced externally via an administrator (wording guessed from poor memory).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yet closing the browser (usually Edge) and reopening it would remove Safesearch.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the recent DNS problems I changed away from router (Hub2) i.e. PN-supplied DNS to independent services. This weirdness no longer happens. It's consistently off as my Google accounts specifies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The interesting thing here is NOT ONLY that Safesearch was inconsistent BUT it was being imposed when NOT ASKED FOR!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not sure which is worse, censorship you've not asked for or censorship that is inconsistent........&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 18:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034545#M40511</guid>
      <dc:creator>HPsauce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-10T18:56:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034548#M40513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7732"&gt;@HPsauce&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- thanks for sharing your experience. Those symptoms are exactly what we're trying to get to the bottom of.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/130208"&gt;@CuriousSideny&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- it's the website (or Google Safesearch) lookups that would be handy rather than the server ID ones. i.e: -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;&amp;gt; nslookup pof.com 213.120.234.42&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Above assumes that you have dating websites blocked. Substitute pof.com for another website that falls into a category you do have blocked if not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Specifying the Safeguard DNS server address just removes any ambiguity around what DNS server is replying to your lookups.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 19:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034548#M40513</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobpullen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-10T19:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safesearch inconsistently enforced</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034550#M40514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;but unfortunately I can't really give you any more useful information. I must say I did find it really quite weird and inexplicable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As a retired IT guy I could probably have given more detailed analysis with a bit of effort but it wasn't a significant annoyance to me and I've now bypassed it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 20:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Everything-else/Safesearch-inconsistently-enforced/m-p/2034550#M40514</guid>
      <dc:creator>HPsauce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-10T20:31:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

