<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Greenby email catch all setting? in Email</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046514#M60831</link>
    <description>I havent migrated yet but was browsing the greenby faqs and came across one about their email catch all&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://greenby.com/support/knowledgebase/article/15" target="_blank"&gt;https://greenby.com/support/knowledgebase/article/15&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;According to that the default for catch all is OFF. Is that the case or is the article incorrect?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason I ask is the Plusnet default for catch all is ON&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surely that means anyone who has given out an email address that they dont have defined as as mailbox/alias and has relied on defaulted ON plusnet catch all to redirect to existing/default mailbox is going to start having dropped emails once migrated to greenby and may not even realise?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hopefully i am missing something and all is well</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 20:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>njay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-20T20:09:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Greenby email catch all setting?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046514#M60831</link>
      <description>I havent migrated yet but was browsing the greenby faqs and came across one about their email catch all&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://greenby.com/support/knowledgebase/article/15" target="_blank"&gt;https://greenby.com/support/knowledgebase/article/15&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;According to that the default for catch all is OFF. Is that the case or is the article incorrect?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason I ask is the Plusnet default for catch all is ON&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surely that means anyone who has given out an email address that they dont have defined as as mailbox/alias and has relied on defaulted ON plusnet catch all to redirect to existing/default mailbox is going to start having dropped emails once migrated to greenby and may not even realise?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hopefully i am missing something and all is well</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 20:09:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046514#M60831</guid>
      <dc:creator>njay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-20T20:09:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greenby email catch all setting?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046521#M60832</link>
      <description>...Interesting.&lt;BR /&gt;I have never used this Catch-All setting before.&lt;BR /&gt;It does remind me of another email setting that did not transfer from Plusnet to Greenby email, the Spam setting. In Plusnet I had Spam filtering 'OFF'. This transferred to Greenby as 'ON' by default - with a default setting of Level 3 (More Aggressive).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 20:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046521#M60832</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-20T20:53:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greenby email catch all setting?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046522#M60833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My catch-all setting for one mailbox was migrated unchanged from Force9/Plusnet to Greenby.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, one problem I had was that if you want to&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;send&lt;/STRONG&gt; from an address in the catch-all mailbox you must have an alias for that address in that mailbox - which rather negates one advantage of the catch-all! This also applies in&amp;nbsp;all other mailboxes, if the address is not the mailbox name. Otherwise the send fails with "Unknown Sender"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 20:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046522#M60833</guid>
      <dc:creator>mavison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-20T20:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Greenby email catch all setting?</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046529#M60835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/50445"&gt;@mavison&lt;/a&gt; Good ! This prevent spam sending from your domain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 07:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Greenby-email-catch-all-setting/m-p/2046529#M60835</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilipHeyes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-21T07:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

