<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic current SPF record in Email</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036410#M57696</link>
    <description>I currently have the following set tor my domain (dns is via netnerd)

v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:185.229.21.108 +ip4:185.229.22.122 +ip4:81.27.85.25 +include:_spf-internal.plus.net +include:_spf-internal2.plus.net +include:madasafish.com -all

However a check shows that several of the IP addresses in the _spf-internal2.plus.net set are duplicated in _spf-internal.madasafish.com

Are the changes to PNs email services being reflected in the SPF record?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:15:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-03T17:15:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>current SPF record</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036410#M57696</link>
      <description>I currently have the following set tor my domain (dns is via netnerd)

v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:185.229.21.108 +ip4:185.229.22.122 +ip4:81.27.85.25 +include:_spf-internal.plus.net +include:_spf-internal2.plus.net +include:madasafish.com -all

However a check shows that several of the IP addresses in the _spf-internal2.plus.net set are duplicated in _spf-internal.madasafish.com

Are the changes to PNs email services being reflected in the SPF record?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:15:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036410#M57696</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T17:15:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: current SPF record</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036438#M57703</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is to be expected, plus.net and maaf.com both use the same address spaces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why are you referencing both plus.net and maaf.com SPF lookups?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On a quick scan the only duplication I saw is in relation to&amp;nbsp;84.93.230.227 (specified in the plus.net group) with&amp;nbsp;84.93.230.224/27 (in the MAAF group).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;See also &lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Correct-SPF-record/m-p/1905900#M41782" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Correct-SPF-record/m-p/1905900#M41782&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What issue are you encountering?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 03:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036438#M57703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-04T03:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: current SPF record</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036625#M57770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;because that's the spf set that PN said to use - somewhere on this forum back in the mists of time&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So it could well be wrong now, and with Greenby getting involved I thought I should get it set correctly for my domain&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 19:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/current-SPF-record/m-p/2036625#M57770</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-05T19:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

