<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox in Email</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030389#M55656</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The most recent false EVRI message to us was also not marked with&amp;nbsp; X_Spam Yes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;despite containing the hallmarks of a fake sender :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;Authentication-Results: mail.enmail.co;
	dkim=none;
	spf=softfail (mail.enmail.co: 217.16.223.153 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of nhpzNlKzy@sanssoucis.com) smtp.mailfrom=nhpzNlKzy@sanssoucis.com;
	dmarc=none
Received: from BsveLwbSgA (gun-ghluasad-80-80-185-185.hebrides.net [80.80.185.185] (may be forged))&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 10:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhilipHeyes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-30T10:55:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030385#M55655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Subject line says it all really.&amp;nbsp; This latest one looks like an EVRI delivery message but it is most definitely not from EVRI.&amp;nbsp; I've just reported it to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) report@phishing.gov.uk&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) abuse@plus.net&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, marked the offending message as spam via the webmail interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone from Plusnet (&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/26334"&gt;@plusnettony&lt;/a&gt;?) reassure us mere mortal users that they are trying to fix what ever has become broken with the spam filters?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 09:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030385#M55655</guid>
      <dc:creator>stuck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-30T09:41:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030389#M55656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The most recent false EVRI message to us was also not marked with&amp;nbsp; X_Spam Yes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;despite containing the hallmarks of a fake sender :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;Authentication-Results: mail.enmail.co;
	dkim=none;
	spf=softfail (mail.enmail.co: 217.16.223.153 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of nhpzNlKzy@sanssoucis.com) smtp.mailfrom=nhpzNlKzy@sanssoucis.com;
	dmarc=none
Received: from BsveLwbSgA (gun-ghluasad-80-80-185-185.hebrides.net [80.80.185.185] (may be forged))&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 10:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030389#M55656</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilipHeyes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-30T10:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030508#M55691</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;These things are looked at, yes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 11:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030508#M55691</guid>
      <dc:creator>plusnettony</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-01T11:12:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: yet another topic about the increase in spam reaching inbox</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030668#M55781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Many spam messages that pass through the system undetected lack the email header section for :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Authentication-Results:&lt;/STRONG&gt; ( DKIM / SPF / DMARC )&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/yet-another-topic-about-the-increase-in-spam-reaching-inbox/m-p/2030668#M55781</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilipHeyes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-02T11:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

