<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PN 'spam' filter. in Email</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014438#M51114</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. I understand all of that. The two 'tests' I sent myself were short maybe a dozen or so words, the eBay one was a kind of standard marketing message, and the NYT&amp;nbsp; one was mostly plain text with one (NYT)&amp;nbsp; link.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is why, many years ago, i dispensed with PN filtering - I discovered it was blocking legit mail, and as I&amp;nbsp; had Mailwasher installed anyway, I&amp;nbsp; decided to disable it - I, not Cloudmark, will decide what mail I receive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll do a deeper dive later.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 13:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-21T13:25:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PN 'spam' filter.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014429#M51107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This doesn't really matter to me, but just out of interest, and because I'm bored, I checked the full headers on four emails I received today, and they all reported a 'spam score of 99 - I assume this means Cloudmark thinks they were all pure spam?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They weren't - two were 'test' messages I sent myself from one of my iCloud accounts, one from eBay, and one from the New York Times.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have PN spam filtering turned off, so they came through, but I wonder what would happen to them if it was on?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014429#M51107</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T12:50:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN 'spam' filter.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014433#M51109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If spam filter were switched on and discard obvious spam were enabled, you would not have seen them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To understand what gave rise to the SPAM rating, one would need to inspect the other headers too - think SPF / DKIM / DMARC verification.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After that it is down the the content ... or indeed the lack of it!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014433#M51109</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T12:56:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN 'spam' filter.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014438#M51114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. I understand all of that. The two 'tests' I sent myself were short maybe a dozen or so words, the eBay one was a kind of standard marketing message, and the NYT&amp;nbsp; one was mostly plain text with one (NYT)&amp;nbsp; link.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is why, many years ago, i dispensed with PN filtering - I discovered it was blocking legit mail, and as I&amp;nbsp; had Mailwasher installed anyway, I&amp;nbsp; decided to disable it - I, not Cloudmark, will decide what mail I receive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll do a deeper dive later.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 13:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014438#M51114</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T13:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN 'spam' filter.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014477#M51128</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If spam filter were switched on and discard obvious spam were enabled, you would not have seen them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5145"&gt;@Townman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If spam filter were switched on and discard obvious spam were enabled, you would not have seen them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To understand what gave rise to the SPAM rating, one would need to inspect the other headers too - think &lt;STRONG&gt;SPF / DKIM / DMARC verification.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After that it is down the the content ... or indeed the lack of it!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After that it is down the the content ... or indeed the lack of it!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just checked the eBay message, the only one those mentioned is DKIM 'DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=reply.ebay.co.uk.'&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/PN-spam-filter/m-p/2014477#M51128</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-21T16:09:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

