<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Emails bounced as spam. in Email</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985474#M47443</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having sent emails from a firm of estate agents (@wgblockmanagement.co.uk) and solicitors (@dacbeachcroft.com) bounced as spam. They don't even get as far as my SPAM folder, they're just bounced so I've had to revert to a spare email address which isn't ideal. I can add individuals to my white list, but not the whole domain. Although I have it set on level 1 Plusnet's SPAM filtering seems to be too aggressive. Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dgp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-17T14:56:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Emails bounced as spam.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985474#M47443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having sent emails from a firm of estate agents (@wgblockmanagement.co.uk) and solicitors (@dacbeachcroft.com) bounced as spam. They don't even get as far as my SPAM folder, they're just bounced so I've had to revert to a spare email address which isn't ideal. I can add individuals to my white list, but not the whole domain. Although I have it set on level 1 Plusnet's SPAM filtering seems to be too aggressive. Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985474#M47443</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T14:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emails bounced as spam.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985475#M47444</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/753"&gt;@dgp&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can add individuals to my white list, but not the whole domain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is that you CANNOT (do not know how) or do not want to?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The SPAM list management guidance states...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;White/Blacklist filtering &lt;STRONG&gt;does not apply to catch-all mailboxes&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;You can only enter full email or domain addresses (eg. test@test.com or &lt;STRONG&gt;test.com&lt;/STRONG&gt;)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Each entry given must be placed on a new line&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Wildcards cannot be used&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Mail from senders in the Approved list will always be delivered&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Mail from senders in the Blocked list will always be deleted&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to permit the whole domain, use the domain name omitting the addressee and "@" sign.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the in-bound mail being delivered to the DEFAULT email address and does that have the CATCHALL option set?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The semantics of the guidance could be imprecise in that originally the DEFAULT mailbox was by default a CATCHALL mailbox.&amp;nbsp; Thus the working could be read to infer that the filtering is not applied to the DEFAULT mailbox.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could consider turning off the SPAM filtering entirely (not ideal).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First line call agent are supposed to be capable of offering help, receiving a request to investigate non-delivery ... though they are likely to need information you do not have.&amp;nbsp; It is worth giving them a call ... if they appear confused, ask that the consult ALBERT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would be good to know how you get on.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:05:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985475#M47444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T15:05:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Emails bounced as spam.</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985477#M47445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ahh. Thanks. I’ve misunderstood, so read that as a ‘do not know how’. I’ll give it a go. But I guess I was also making a wider point that genuine businesses are having their emails treated as spam and the recipients could be oblivious.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Emails-bounced-as-spam/m-p/1985477#M47445</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T15:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

